Article

[Evaluation of indirect immunofluorescence as a supplementary test for the diagnosis of HIV-1 infection].

Departamento de Microbiología, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Revista Argentina de microbiología (impact factor: 0.5). 30(2):59-63. pp.59-63
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT In order to be used as an alternative or complementary test to confirm HIV-1 infection, the efficiency of indirect immunofluorescence assay (IFA) was compared with Western blot (WB) in 362 samples from persons with high and low risk behaviour. A panel of sera with 220 WB positive, 122 WB negative and 20 WB indeterminate sera were tested by an "in house" IFA. The sensitivity of IFA was found to be 98.63% and the specificity 98.36%. Therefore, IFA appeared to be an efficient alternative method to WB, since the cost of testing by IFA is less than 10% of WB testing. We observed a direct relationship between WB protein reactivity and IFA results. In 15 samples with coincident indeterminate results for WB and IFA, antibody reactivity to p24 and gp160 presented the highest frequency. On the other hand, antibodies to viral glycoproteins were always present in IFA weak positive samples, showing their high predictive value.

0 0
 · 
0 Bookmarks
 · 
21 Views

Keywords

122 WB negative
 
15 samples
 
20 WB indeterminate sera
 
220 WB positive
 
antibodies
 
coincident indeterminate results
 
complementary test
 
direct relationship
 
efficient alternative method
 
highest frequency
 
HIV-1 infection
 
IFA
 
IFA results
 
IFA weak positive samples
 
indirect immunofluorescence assay
 
low risk behaviour
 
viral glycoproteins
 
WB protein reactivity
 
WB testing
 
Western blot
 

A Ceballos