Article

Glenohumeral joint: internal and external rotation range of motion in javelin throwers.

Sport Science and Medicine Centre, Manchester Metropolitan University, Crewe and Alsager Faculty, Stoke on Trent, United Kingdom.
British Journal of Sports Medicine (Impact Factor: 3.67). 09/1998; 32(3):226-8. DOI: 10.1136/bjsm.32.3.226
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT To assess differences in glenohumeral joint rotatory range of movement in javelin throwers between the throwing and non-throwing arm.
A universal 360 degrees goniometer was used to assess glenohumeral joint external and internal rotation range in 90 degrees of shoulder abduction in a group of ten senior international javelin throwers.
Both arms had significantly greater degrees of external than internal rotation (p < 0.01), and the throwing arm had significantly greater range of external rotation than the non-throwing arm (p < 0.01).
The presence of an excessive range of external rotation in the throwing shoulder has the potential to increase eccentric load on the rotator cuff muscles and strain on the passive restraints of the glenohumeral joint. Both of these factors have been implicated in the pathological processes leading to injury in the overhead throwing athlete.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
131 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To assess if joint position sense (JPS) in the shoulder differed between un-injured rugby players, matched control subjects and previously injured rehabilitated rugby players. Mixed design. University biomechanics laboratory. 15 asymptomatic professional rugby union players, 15 previously injured professional rugby union players, 15 asymptomatic matched non-rugby playing controls had their JPS assessed. JPS was assessed using two criterion angles in the 90 degrees shoulder abduction position (45 degrees and 80 degrees external rotation). The study found a significant difference between groups in error score (p=0.02). The testing angle also had a significant effect on error score (p=0.002), with greater error scores occurring in the mid range position. This study showed rugby players to have better JPS than controls, indicating JPS might not be related to injury risk. Poor JPS appears to be related to injury, players having sustained an injury have decreased JPS despite surgery and/or rehabilitation and returning to sport without incident.
    Physical therapy in sport: official journal of the Association of Chartered Physiotherapists in Sports Medicine 02/2010; 11(1):18-22. · 0.67 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Joint range of motion (ROM) is very important in daily activities, sport and in clinical diagnosis. Many factors have been reported to influence joint ROM. Muscu-loskeletal adaptation and some special side effects due to his or her physical demands and movement patterns in professional athletes are very important subjects in sport sciences. The present study is a comparison of shoulder joint ROM in elite athlete and non-athlete groups and its relationship to their age, post and years of their tournament play. The subjects in this study included 106 men with mean age (23.65 ± 3.45) and mean years of tournament play (5.60 ± 2.23). The groups of subjects included 26 handball players, 25 volleyball players, 25 soccer players and 30 non-athletes. Data were collected through questionnaires and inspection, and subjects' ROM was measured by "Leighton flex-ometer" (r = 0.90 – 0.99) in external rotation and ab-duction of shoulder joint in dominant and non-domi-nant hands. Data were analyzed by correlation coeffi-cient, t – test, ANOVA and post hock Schaffe test. The results showed that an increase in age and years of tournament play reduced the shoulder ROM of sub-jects (p ≤ 0.05). There were significant differences in shoulder ROM among athletic groups. Additionally, there are significant differences between dominant and non-dominant hands (p ≤ 0.05). It can be concluded that more specific stretching exercises and warm-up for shoulder in all athletes and especially in older and ex-perienced players should be performed by coaches. The results also emphasized routine screening, corrective exercise programs and a design of preventing strategies by athletic trainers and coaches.
    Journal of biomedical science and engineering 01/2010; 338108. · 0.27 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Aim. The objective of the present study was to compare the range of motion (ROM) of shoulder joint in movements (inward and outward rotation, abduction and extension) in active and former weightlifters, and ordinary people (nonweightlifters). Methods. For this purpose, 61 men aged 19-29 years from Golestan and Markazi provinces were selected using cluster random sampling and categorized in three groups, that is, active weightlifters (N.=23), former weightlifters (N.=18) and non-weightlifters (N.=20) who, then, participated in a causal-comparative study. Measurements were conducted using Universal goniometer as suggested in Norkin and White’s method (1995). Data analysis was carried out using paired t-test, ANOVA and LSD. Results. ROM of shoulder joint in active and former weightlifters was significantly less than in non-weightlifters (P<0.05). There were no significant differences between ROM of shoulder joint in active and former weightlifters (P<0.05). Conclusion. It could be concluded that ROM decrease among the weightlifters after they retire from this field might be expected.
    Medicina dello sport; rivista di fisiopatologia dello sport 03/2013; 66(4):2013. · 0.29 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

View
166 Downloads
Available from
May 27, 2014