Article

Comparative evaluation in pharyngo-oesophageal reconstruction: radial forearm flap compared with jejunal flap. A 10-year experience.

Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tokyo, Japan.
Scandinavian Journal of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery and Hand Surgery (Impact Factor: 0.94). 09/1998; 32(3):307-10.
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT We reviewed 109 consecutive patients with cancer of the hypopharynx or cervical oesophagus who underwent free flap transfer for immediate reconstruction after total pharyngolaryngo-oesophagectomy. The free flaps used were either free jejunal (n = 70) or radial forearm flaps (n = 39). Significantly more fistulas (3/70 compared with 15/39, p < 0.0001) and strictures (6/64 compared with 13/33, p = 0.0008) developed in the radial forearm than the jejunal flap group. However, functional donor site morbidity was minimal and there were no cases of total flap necrosis in the forearm flap group. We consider that the free jejunal flap should be the first choice for total reconstruction of pharyngo-oesophageal defects. However, the forearm flap is suitable for elderly, high risk patients, because it is less invasive and has minimal donor site morbidity, which facilitates early recovery.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
76 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background: Radical excision of advanced hypopharyngeal and laryngeal tumors usually compromises both swallowing and speech. Among the available reconstruction methods, the free ileocolon flap allows rehabilitation of both functions in one stage. The donor-site morbidity of this flap has not been addressed in head and neck cancer patients. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted in 34 patients between April of 2003 and December of 2007 to investigate donor-site morbidity in patients undergoing reconstruction with free ileocolon flaps. Complications such as diarrhea, upper gastrointestinal tract distress, bowel leak, abscess, or hernia formation were evaluated. Significant association of diarrhea and upper gastrointestinal distress, previous abdominal operations, systemic diseases, primary versus secondary reconstruction, flap length, and postoperative chemotherapy were subsequently evaluated. Differences were considered significant for values of p ≤ 0.05. Results: There were no perioperative or postoperative deaths. Nineteen patients (56 percent) experienced temporary diarrhea. In all but two patients, diarrhea discontinued by 4 months. Chemotherapy was significantly associated with diarrhea (p < 0.01). Colchicine, terbinafine, and heroin withdrawal episodically caused diarrhea but statistical conclusions could not be drawn. Six patients (18 percent) suffered from upper gastrointestinal tract problems (gastroduodenal ulcer, erosive gastritis, and minor bleeding), probably because of insufficient gastric protection. Conclusions: The free ileocolon flap proved to be a reliable method when simultaneous restoration of swallowing and speech was required, with donor-site morbidity comparable to that of the other intestinal flaps.
    Plastic &amp Reconstructive Surgery 11/2008; 122(6):186e-194e. · 3.54 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: The Jejunal Free Flap (JFF) was first described by Seidenberg in 1957 for the reconstruction of pharyngolryngectomy defects. Historically, its outcome profile has been better than alternative reconstructions. Recently, the use of tubed Fasciocutaneous Free Flaps (FCFF) has been increasing as series reporting outcomes superior or equivalent to JFF are published. Our experience with JFF has been more positive than recently published reports suggest. This study aims to provide an accurate and up-to-date assessment of outcomes in JFF reconstruction of pharyngolaryngectomy defects and to compare these results to those of contemporary alternative techniques. METHODS: 368 Consecutive free jejunum reconstructions were performed for pharyngolaryngectomy defects between 1977 and 2010. All patients had been assessed by a multidisciplinary Head and Neck Clinic prior to surgery. A systematic review of recent literature pertaining to pharyngolaryngectomy reconstruction outcomes was undertaken for comparison with our dataset. RESULTS: 70.9% of tumours in this series were T-grade 3 or 4. Perioperative mortality was 3.8% and flap failure occurred in 2.98%. The incidence of anastomotic leak was 8.2% and stricture occurred in 10.9%. A full oral diet was maintained by 91.6% of patients by day 12 on average. 70.6% underwent primary tracheo-oesophageal puncture and of these 78.1% had effective speech. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, our data compares favourably with other series. The strengths of the JFF reconstruction are the capacity to maintain an oral diet, low stricture and leak rates and the versatility to reconstruct long segment defects. We have observed variability in leak rates throughout the study period, which may be operator dependant. The gap between outcomes for FCFF and JFF reconstructions has narrowed but the latter remains our reconstruction of choice for pharyngolaryngectomy defects.
    Journal of Plastic Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery 09/2012; · 1.44 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Various techniques have been developed to reconstruct head and neck defects following surgery to restore function and cosmetics. Free tissue transfer using microvascular anastomosis has transformed surgical outcomes and the quality of life for head and neck cancer patients because this technique has made it possible for surgeons to perform more aggressive ablative surgery, but there is room for improvement to achieve a satisfactory survival rate. Reconstruction using the free tissue transfer technique is closely related to cardiovascular surgery because the anastomosis techniques used by head and neck surgeons are based on those of cardiovascular surgeons; thus, suggestions from cardiovascular surgeons might lead to further development of this field. The aim of this article is to present the recent general concepts of reconstruction procedures and our experiences of reconstructive surgeries of the oral cavity, mandible, maxilla, oropharynx and hypopharynx to help cardiovascular surgeons understand the reconstructions and share knowledge among themselves and with neck surgeons to develop future directions in head and neck reconstruction.
    Annals of Vascular Diseases 01/2011; 4(3):189-95.