Essential components of schizophrenia care: a Delphi approach

St George's, University of London, Londinium, England, United Kingdom
Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica (Impact Factor: 5.55). 12/1998; 98(5):400-5. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1998.tb10105.x
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Other than medication and access to in-patient care, there is little published consensus on the essential components of schizophrenia care. This paper reports a Delphi approach to the identification of these components. This approach identifies and measures the degree of consensus, using a structured iterative series of questionnaires by a group of experienced UK and Irish psychiatrists (n = 15) on the essential components. Pharmacotherapy, in-patient care and community mental health team (CMHT) staffing were explicitly excluded from the study. In total, 106 components were identified and their importance was rated twice. There was consensus on 92% of the components and strong consensus on 64%. The Delphi results were refined by the participants to produce 10 essential components of care.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Aim To obtain a consensus of expert views on how best to implement screening and brief intervention (SBI) for excessive drinkers in a routine and enduring fashion in primary health care throughout England. Method A Delphi survey of expert opinion in the UK. Participants Seventy‐nine experts in SBI, of whom 53 (67%) remained in round 3 of the survey. The expert panel included primary health‐care professionals, alcohol‐service workers and researchers/ academics. Measurements In round 3, 53 panel members (67% of an initial sample of 79) made ratings on a five‐point Likert scale of 157 items developed from responses to open ended questions in round 1 and fed back with group median ratings derived from round 2. Consensus was defined as an interquartile range of ≤1 and attention was mainly directed to items with consensus around median responses of strong agreement or disagreement. Findings A number of clear conclusions emerged from the survey, including the recommendation of routine screening confined to new patient registrations, general health checks and special types of consultation. The employment of a specialist alcohol worker as a member of the primary health‐care team was strongly supported, but a model of interprofessional cooperation in the delivery of SBI could also be derived from findings. Other conclusions included the importance for the widespread implementation of SBI of a national alcohol strategy.
    Journal of Substance Use 01/2004; 9(2):68-85. DOI:10.1080/14659890410001665014 · 0.48 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This study aimed to establish consensus about the meaning of recovery among individuals with experience of psychosis. A Delphi approach was utilized to allow a large sample of service users to be anonymously consulted about their views on recovery. Service users were invited to take part in a 3-stage consultation process. A total of 381 participants gave their views on recovery in the main stage of this study, with 100 of these taking part in the final review stage. The final list of statements about recovery included 94 items, which were rated as essential or important by >80% of respondents. These statements covered items which define recovery, factors which help recovery, factors which hinder recovery, and factors which show that someone is recovering. As far as we are aware, it is the first study to identify areas of consensus in relation to definitions of recovery from a service user perspective, which are typically reported to be an idiosyncratic process. Implications and recommendations for clinical practice and future research are discussed.
    Schizophrenia Bulletin 04/2014; 40(6). DOI:10.1093/schbul/sbu047 · 8.61 Impact Factor