Article

Characterization of reciprocal translocations in pigs using dual-colour chromosome painting and primed in situ DNA labelling.

ENVT, Laboratoire de Cytogénétique, Toulouse, France.
Chromosome Research (Impact Factor: 2.85). 09/1998; 6(5):361-6. DOI: 10.1023/A:1009244415357
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT We report the use of dual-colour chromosome painting to determine the exact nature of certain chromosome rearrangements observed in the pig (Sus scrofa domestica). The chromosomal abnormalities were detected by GTG- and RBG-banding techniques. The initially proposed interpretations were: (1) rcp(6;13)(p1.5;q4.1); (2) rcp(11;16)(p1.4;q1.4); (3) rcp(6;16)(p1.1;q1.1); (4) rcp(13;17)(q4.1;q1.1); (5) rcp(6;14)(q2.7;q2.1); (6) rcp(3;5)(p1.3;q2.3); (7) rcp(2; 14)(q1.3;q2.7); (8) rcp(15;17)(q1.3;q2.1). Hybridizations were carried out with biotin- and digoxigenin-labelled probes obtained by priming authorizing random mismatches polymerase chain reaction (PARM-PCR) amplification of porcine flow-sorted chromosomes. In some cases, i.e. (1), (4), (5), (6), (7) and (8), the fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) results allowed confirmation of the interpretations proposed with classical cytogenetic methods. Chromosome painting proved the reciprocity of the translocation in cases (1), (6) and (8), whereas modifications of the formula were proposed for case (2). Primed in situ DNA labelling (PRINS) experiments have also been carried out in case (3) using a primer specific for the centromeres of acrocentric chromosomes (first experiment) or a primer specific for the centromeres of a subset of meta- and submetacentric chromosomes including chromosome 6 (second experiment). It allowed us to demonstrate that the breakpoints occurred in the centromeric region of chromosome 16 and in the p. arm of chromosome 6, just above the centromere.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
40 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The aim of this article is not to present an exhaustive review of molecular cytogenetics applications in domestic animal species, but more to illustrate the considerable contribution of these approaches in diagnostics and research in economically important species. A short presentation of the main applications of molecular cytogenetics in humans points out the domains in which it has become an essential tool and underlines the specificities attached to this species in comparison to farm animals. This article is devoted to outlining the current resources available in domestic species and to some examples of fluorescence in situ hybridization applications in the cattle, pig, horse and avian species. From a clinical point of view, these examples illustrate the advantages of FISH for the study of chromosomal abnormalities (identification, characterization and estimation of their effects). Other applications of molecular cytogenetics are also illustrated, particularly ZOO-FISH, an approach which allows the determination of chromosome homologies between species. Finally, a specific emphasis was placed on the usefulness of molecular cytogenetics for the analysis of species such as poultry, which harbour a complex karyotype.
    Cytogenetic and Genome Research 01/2009; 126(1-2):34-48. · 1.84 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Eukaryotic genomes contain far more DNA than needed for coding proteins. Some of these additional DNA sequences comprise non-coding repetitive DNA sequences, mostly satellite DNAs and also transposable elements usually located at the heterochromatic regions of chromosomes. Satellite DNAs consist of tandemly repeated DNA sequences inhabiting the mammalian genome, typically organized in long arrays of hundreds or thousands of copies. Different important functions have been ascribed to satellite DNA, from the imperative centromeric function in mitosis and meiosis to the recent discovery of its involvement in regulatory functions via satellite transcripts. Moreover, satellite DNAs, among other repetitive sequences, are believed to be the 'engine' triggering mammalian genome evolution. Repetitive DNAs are, most likely, the genetic factors responsible for promoting genomic plasticity and therefore higher rates of chromosome mutation. Furthermore, constitutive heterochromatin regions are thought to be 'hotspots' for structural chromosome rearrangements. A considerable collection of evidences places these sequences in the landscape of mammalian evolution. However, the mechanisms that could explain how this alliance between chromosome evolution and satellite DNA is made are still enigmatic and subject of debate. Throughout the mammalian taxa, different patterns of chromosome evolution have been widely registered from heterochromatin additions/eliminations, Robertsonian translocations, whole-arm reciprocal translocations to tandem translocations; the fact is genome's repetitive fraction is playing a central role in mammalian genome structuring. Throughout this review we will focus on the evidences that associate satellite DNAs and constitutive heterochromatin to the process of chromosome evolution and consequently to domestic species genome's remodeling.
    Cytogenetic and Genome Research 01/2009; 126(1-2):12-20. · 1.84 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Comparison of male versus female meiotic segregation patterns for Robertsonian translocation (RT) carriers with similar genetic background has rarely been reported in mammalian species. The aim of this study was to compare the segregation patterns determined for related males and females carrying a 13;17 RT in an animal model (Sus scrofa domestica L.), using dual colour fluorescence in situ hybridization on decondensed sperm nuclei and metaphases II of in vitro-matured oocytes. In males, no association between the trivalent and the XY body was observed in any of the 90 pachytene nuclei studied, and the rate of unbalanced spermatozoa ranged between 2.96% and 3.83%. Female meiotic segregation analyses were carried out on 83 metaphase II oocytes. The rate of unbalanced gametes was higher in females than in males (28.91% versus 3.21%, P < 0.001). This difference was due to higher rates of diploid gametes (12.04% versus 0.05%) and unbalanced gametes produced by the adjacent segregation (16.86% versus 3.16%). This study is a new scientific contribution to the comparison of segregation patterns in related males and females carrying an identical chromosomal rearrangement. It allows a better understanding of the meiotic behaviour of RTs. It also clearly illustrates the relevance of swine as an animal model for such meiotic studies.
    Human Reproduction 05/2009; 24(8):2034-43. · 4.67 Impact Factor

Full-text

View
19 Downloads
Available from
May 23, 2014