Article

Clinical Implications for Four Drugs of the DSM-IV Distinction Between Substance Dependence With and Without a Physiological Component

Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Diego, VA Medical Center, 92161-2002, USA.
American Journal of Psychiatry (Impact Factor: 13.56). 02/1999; 156(1):41-9. DOI: 10.1176/ajp.156.1.41
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The DSM-IV work group asked researchers and clinicians to subtype substance dependent individuals according to the presence or absence of physiological symptoms. A recent report from the Collaborative Study on the Genetics of Alcoholism demonstrated that among alcohol-dependent men and women, a history of tolerance or withdrawal was associated with a more severe clinical course, especially for individuals with histories of alcohol withdrawal. This article evaluates similar distinctions among subjects in the collaborative study who were dependent on marijuana, cocaine, amphetamines, or opiates.
Structured interviews gathered information from 1,457 individuals with a lifetime diagnosis of marijuana dependence, 1,262 with histories of cocaine dependence, 647 with amphetamine dependence, and 368 subjects with opiate dependence. For each drug, the clinical course was compared for subjects whose dependence included a history of withdrawal (group 1), those dependent on each drug who denied withdrawal but reported tolerance (group 2), and those who denied both tolerance and withdrawal (group 3).
The proportion of dependent individuals who denied tolerance or withdrawal (group 3) ranged from 30% for marijuana to 4% for opiates. For each substance, individuals in groups 1 and 2 evidenced more severe substance-related problems and at least a trend for greater intensities of exposure to the drug; those reporting withdrawal (group 1) showed the greatest intensity of problems.
The designation of dependence in the context of tolerance or withdrawal identifies individuals with more severe clinical histories. These results support the importance of the designation of a physiological component to dependence, especially for people who have experienced a withdrawal syndrome.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Jean-Bernard Daeppen, Aug 20, 2015
0 Followers
 · 
114 Views
  • Source
    • "The proportion of subjects experiencing cannabis withdrawal is somewhat greater than that in most other studies of nontreatment-seeking adults with frequent lifetime or current cannabis use (range 15.6–40.9%) (Cottler et al., 1995; Schuckit et al., 1999; Swift et al., 1998, 2000; Wiesbeck et al., 1996) and smaller than that in two Australian studies of cannabis-dependent adults (95.5%, 88.8%) (Copeland et al., 2001; Swift et al., 2001). Differences in prevalence of true cannabis dependence and in substance abuse and psychiatric comorbidity among the various study populations may explain the discrepancy. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Cannabis withdrawal is not recognized in DSM-IV because of doubts about its clinical significance. Assess the phenomenon of cannabis withdrawal and its relationship to relapse in non-treatment-seeking adults. Convenience sample of 469 adult cannabis smokers who had made a quit attempt while not in a controlled environment. Subjects completed a 176-item Marijuana Quit Questionnaire collecting information on sociodemographic characteristics, cannabis use history, and their "most difficult" cannabis quit attempt. 42.4% of subjects had experienced a lifetime withdrawal syndrome, of whom 70.4% reported using cannabis in response to withdrawal. During the index quit attempt, 95.5% of subjects reported > or =1 individual withdrawal symptom (mean [SD] 9.5 [6.1], median 9.0); 43.1% reported > or =10. Number of withdrawal symptoms was significantly associated with greater frequency and amount of cannabis use, but symptoms occurred even in those using less than weekly. Symptoms were usually of > or = moderate intensity and often prompted actions to relieve them. Alcohol (41.5%) and tobacco (48.2%) were used more often than cannabis (33.3%) for this purpose. There was little change during withdrawal in use of other legal or illegal substances. Cannabis withdrawal is a common syndrome among adults not seeking treatment. The intention to relieve withdrawal symptoms can drive relapse during quit attempts, giving cannabis withdrawal clinical significance as a target of treatment.
    Drug and alcohol dependence 09/2010; 111(1-2):120-7. DOI:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2010.04.010 · 3.28 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "The findings of previous studies also are limited in some ways. Schuckit et al. (1999) examined stimulant dependence symptoms as defined in DSM-III-R that occurred sporadically over the course of participants' lives. Because lifetime diagnoses are not specifically defined in DSM- IV, 1 it is unclear whether and to what extent results from lifetime symptoms apply to a current (past year) DSM-IV Drug Dependence that requires the occurrence of at least three criteria within a continuous 12-month period. 1 In addition, there are presently no known studies of subtypes of Amphetamine Dependence using DSM-IV criteria of current Dependence. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: We investigated the presence of DSM-IV subtyping for dependence on cocaine and amphetamines (with versus without physical dependence) among outpatient stimulant users enrolled in a multisite study of the Clinical Trials Network (CTN). Three mutually exclusive groups were identified: primary cocaine users (n = 287), primary amphetamine users (n = 99), and dual users (cocaine and amphetamines; n = 29). Distinct subtypes were examined with latent class and logistic regression procedures. Cocaine users were distinct from amphetamine users in age and race/ethnicity. There were four distinct classes of primary cocaine users: non-dependence (15%), compulsive use (14%), tolerance and compulsive use (15%), and physiological dependence (tolerance, withdrawal, and compulsive use; 56%). Three distinct classes of primary amphetamine users were identified: non-dependence (11%), intermediate physiological dependence (31%), and physiological dependence (58%). Regardless of stimulants used, most female users were in the most severe or the physiological dependence group. These results lend support for subtyping dependence in the emerging DSM-V.
    American Journal on Addictions 05/2009; 18(3):206-18. DOI:10.1080/10550490902787031 · 1.74 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "In addition, we examined the extent to which dysphoric symptoms affect NP function, since depression/ dysphoria is a common psychostimulant withdrawal symptom (Association, 2000). Depression/dysphoria is also associated with more severe dependence (Schuckit et al, 1999; Sofuoglu et al, 2003), exacerbating NP deficits in drug-abusing (Di Sclafani et al, 2002) and non-drug abusing (Fossati et al, 2002) populations. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Individuals with current cocaine use disorders (CUD) form a heterogeneous group, making sensitive neuropsychological (NP) comparisons with healthy individuals difficult. The current study examined the effects on NP functioning of four factors that commonly vary among CUD: urine status for cocaine (positive vs negative on study day), cigarette smoking, alcohol consumption, and dysphoria. Sixty-four cocaine abusers were matched to healthy comparison subjects on gender and race; the groups also did not differ in measures of general intellectual functioning. All subjects were administered an extensive NP battery measuring attention, executive function, memory, facial and emotion recognition, and motor function. Compared with healthy control subjects, CUD exhibited performance deficits on tasks of attention, executive function, and verbal memory (within one standard deviation of controls). Although CUD with positive urine status, who had higher frequency and more recent cocaine use, reported greater symptoms of dysphoria, these cognitive deficits were most pronounced in the CUD with negative urine status. Cigarette smoking, frequency of alcohol consumption, and dysphoria did not alter these results. The current findings replicate a previously reported statistically significant, but relatively mild NP impairment in CUD as compared with matched healthy control individuals and further suggest that frequent/recent cocaine use [corrected] may mask underlying cognitive (but not mood) disturbances. These results call for development of pharmacological agents targeted to enhance cognition, without negatively impacting mood in individuals addicted to cocaine.
    Neuropsychopharmacology: official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology 06/2008; 34(5):1112-22. DOI:10.1038/npp.2008.60 · 7.83 Impact Factor
Show more