Automated detection of the factor V Leiden mutation using the LCx microparticle enzyme immunoassay.

Hematology-Oncology Section, Brockton-West Roxbury Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Brockton, MA 02410, USA.
Clinical Chemistry (Impact Factor: 7.15). 01/1999; 45(1):41-6.
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The factor V Leiden mutation, a G-->A transition at position 1691 in exon 10 of the gene that codes for factor V, produces an Arg506Gln substitution and is the most common genetic risk factor for venous thrombosis. We have developed a rapid, sensitive, and specific method to detect the factor V Leiden mutation in genomic DNA from whole blood by PCR amplification and microparticle enzyme immunoassay detection using the Abbott LCx instrument. We compared this automated method with the standard procedure using restriction endonuclease digestion of PCR products followed by gel electrophoresis in blinded experiments. In 130 patients (from Veterans Affairs medical centers) with deep venous thromboses, including 24 heterozygotes with the factor V Leiden mutation, there was complete agreement between the two methods. The assay was also able to distinguish heterozygotes from homozygotes. This method, which carries a low potential for cross-contamination of samples, should be a useful routine test for the factor V Leiden mutation in clinical laboratories with sufficient demand for molecular diagnostic assays using the LCx instrument.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The prothrombin mutation, a G/A transition at position 20210 in the 3' untranslated region of the prothrombin gene, is associated with an increased risk of deep venous thrombosis and obstetrical complications. Several methods have been developed to detect the mutation; however, given the increased demand for this test in risk factor assessment, the development of simple and efficient screening methods has become necessary. We have used a rapid, sensitive, and precise method developed by Abbott Laboratories to detect the prothrombin mutation. The method employs a polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification and the Abbot LCx microparticle enzyme immunoassay (MEIA) for detection. This method is able to detect and identify both homozygous and heterozygous genotypes. Two hundred ninety-six patients with a history of deep venous thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, preeclampsia, or cardiovascular disease and 163 control patients were included in this study. The prevalence of the mutation was 5.74% in the high-risk group and 3.06% in the control group. There was complete agreement between the results from the MEIA detection with those obtained using other detection methodologies, namely standard PCR and restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) analysis. The MEIA detection method of the prothrombin mutation represents a simple, fast, and reliable alternative to standard methods of detection and is well suited for use in routine clinical laboratories. The results of our study confirm others' studies showing a greater incidence of G20210A prothrombin gene mutation in patients with an increased risk of venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism as well as patients with cardiovascular disease and pregnant women with preeclampsia. It reinforces the necessity of including the screening for prothrombin mutation in populations at risk.
    Clinica Chimica Acta 01/2002; 314(1-2):249-54. · 2.85 Impact Factor
  • Revista Clínica Española 03/2000; 200(2):77-83. · 2.01 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: With the identification of common single locus point mutations as risk factors for thrombophilia, many DNA testing methodologies have been described for detecting these variations. Traditionally, functional or immunological testing methods have been used to investigate quantitative anticoagulant deficiencies. However, with the emergence of the genetic variations, factor V Leiden, prothrombin 20210 and, to a lesser extent, the methylene tetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR677) and factor V HR2 haplotype, traditional testing methodologies have proved to be less useful and instead DNA technology is more commonly employed in diagnostics. This review considers many of the DNA techniques that have proved to be useful in the detection of common genetic variants that predispose to thrombophilia. Techniques involving gel analysis are used to detect the presence or absence of restriction sites, electrophoretic mobility shifts, as in single strand conformation polymorphism or denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis, and product formation in allele-specific amplification. Such techniques may be sensitive, but are unwielding and often need to be validated objectively. In order to overcome some of the limitations of gel analysis, especially when dealing with larger sample numbers, many alternative detection formats, such as closed tube systems, microplates and microarrays (minisequencing, real-time polymerase chain reaction, and oligonucleotide ligation assays) have been developed. In addition, many of the emerging technologies take advantage of colourimetric or fluorescence detection (including energy transfer) that allows qualitative and quantitative interpretation of results. With the large variety of DNA technologies available, the choice of methodology will depend on several factors including cost and the need for speed, simplicity and robustness.
    Blood Coagulation and Fibrinolysis 01/2001; 11(8):683-700. · 1.25 Impact Factor


Available from