Article

Evaluation of methods for detecting alloantibodies underlying warm autoantibodies.

American Red Cross Blood Services, Southern California Region, Los Angeles 90006, USA.
Transfusion (Impact Factor: 3.57). 02/1999; 39(1):11-6. DOI: 10.1046/j.1537-2995.1999.39199116889.x
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT In pretransfusion testing of patients whose sera contain autoantibodies reacting optimally at 37 degrees C, it must be determined whether alloantibodies are also present. Two approaches, testing a 1-in-5 dilution of patients' sera and the adsorption of sera in the presence of polyethylene glycol (PEG), have been proposed as alternatives to the time-consuming approach of adsorbing sera with ficin- or ZZAP-treated red cells (RBCs). The three approaches were compared.
Patients' sera containing warm autoantibodies, with and without alloantibodies, were retested 1) after dilution (1-in-5) and 2) after adsorption with allogeneic RBCs in the presence of PEG. Results were compared to those after adsorption with ZZAP-treated allogeneic RBCs.
Dilution (1-in-5): Twenty-seven of 119 sera (7/26 [27%] with and 20/93 [22%] without alloantibodies) did not react; one example each of alloanti-D, -E, -e, -Fy(a), and -Jk(a), and two examples of anti-Jk(b) were not detected at a dilution of 1 in 5. Alloantibodies were identified in 5 (19%) of 26 1-in-5 diluted sera containing alloantibodies; 87 (73%) of 119 sera still reacted with all cells and would have required further workup. PEG adsorption: Thirty-nine sera were tested after parallel PEG and ZZAP adsorptions. The PEG adsorptions required a total of 55 aliquots of adsorbing cells and 13.75 hours, whereas ZZAP adsorptions required 61 aliquots and 30.5 hours. All alloantibodies (anti-D [3], -C [2], -c [1], -E [4], -K [2], -Fy(a) [1], -Jk(a) [2], -Jk(b) [1]) reacted in the adsorbed serum-PEG mixtures at a strength equal to or greater than that in the ZZAP-adsorbed sera.
Although the 1-in-5 dilution approach is convenient, only 22 percent of warm autoantibodies without alloantibodies were nonreactive, and 27 percent of alloantibodies of potential clinical significance were not detected. PEG adsorption appears to give similar results to those of ZZAP adsorption, but it has the advantages of eliminating the cost and time of prior treatment of the allogeneic adsorbing cells and of a reduction of at least a 50 percent in adsorption time.

0 Followers
 · 
300 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background. Red blood cell (RBC) alloimmunization results from genetic disparity of RBC antigens between donor and recipients. Data about alloimmunization rate in general patient population is scarce especially from resource limited countries. We undertook this study to determine prevalence and specificity of RBC alloantibodies in patients admitted in various clinical specialties at a tertiary care hospital in North India. Methods. Antibody screening was carried out in 11,235 patients on automated QWALYS 3 platform (Diagast, Loos, France). Antibody identification was carried out with an 11-cell identification panel (ID-Diapanel, Diamed GmbH, Switzerland). Results. The overall incidence of RBC alloimmunization in transfused patients was 1.4% (157/11235), with anti-E being the most common specificity (36.3%), followed by anti-D (16%), anti-c (6.4%), anti-c + E (6.4%), anti-C + D (5.1%), and anti-K (4.5%). The highest incidence of alloimmunization was observed in hematology/oncology patients (1.9%), whereas in other specialties the range was 0.7-1%. Conclusion. As alloimmunization complicates the transfusion outcomes, authors recommend pretransfusion antibody screening and issue of Rh and Kell matched blood to patients who warrant high transfusion requirements in future.
    Advances in Hematology 01/2014; 2014:749218. DOI:10.1155/2014/749218
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background and Aim:Autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA) is characterized by the production of autoantibodies directed against red cell antigens. Most patients of AIHA arrive in the emergency or out-patient department (OPD) with severe anemia requiring urgent blood transfusion. Here we share our experience of managing these patients with incompatible blood transfusions and suggest the minimal test required to assure patient safety.Materials and Methods:A total of 14 patients admitted with severe anemia, diagnosed with AIHA and requiring blood transfusion urgently were included in the study. A series of immunohematological investigations were performed to confirm the diagnosis and issue best match packed red blood cells (PRBC) to these patients.Results:A total of 167 PRBC units were crossmatched for 14 patients of which 46 units (28%) were found to be best match ones and 26 (56.5%) of these units were transfused. A mean turn around time of 222 min was observed in issuing the “best match” blood. Severe hemolysis was observed in all patients with a median hemoglobin increment of 0.88 g/dl after each unit PRBC transfusion.Conclusion:Decision to transfuse in AIHA should be based on the clinical condition of the patient. No critical patient should be denied blood transfusion due to serological incompatibility. Minimum investigations such as direct antiglobulin test (DAT), antibody screening and autocontrol should be performed to ensure transfusion safety in patients. All transfusion services should be capable of issuing “best match” PRBCs in AIHA.
    Asian Journal of Transfusion Science 03/2014; 8(2):105-108. DOI:10.4103/0973-6247.137445
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This study aimed to explore the law of superposition and masking between autoantibodies and alloantibodies, and to ensure the detection of alloantibodies and to improve the safety of warm autoimmune hemolytic anemia patients. Eight kinds of commercial IgG red blood cell antibody reagents were serially diluted, and 3 kinds of antibodies at dilutions showing a continuous gradual decline in agglutination strength with the corresponding antigen red blood cells were treated as the target antibodies. Anti-D and anti-M were treated as simulated autoantibodies, and anti-Fy(a) was treated as a simulated alloantibody. Four concentrations, 4+, 3+, 2+ and 1+, of autoantibodies and three concentrations, 3+, 2+ and 1+, of alloantibodies were combined, and 12 kinds of hybrid antibodies were detected and evaluated by the anti-human globulin micro-column gel assay. When the simulated strong autoantibody (4+) was used, the alloantibodies (3+, 2+, 1+) had no effect on the final agglutination strength; when the strength of agglutination produced by the simulated autoantibody was less than 4+, and at the same time there were alloantibodies (3+, 2+, 1+), the differences in agglutination strength with a panel of RBCs could be clearly observed. Strong autoantibodies (4+) can exert a masking effect, leading to alloantibodies being undetected; autoantibodies less than 4+, will produce the superimposed effect with alloantibodies, resulting in differences in agglutination strength.
    Genetics and molecular research: GMR 01/2014; 13(2):4666-4672. DOI:10.4238/2014.June.18.9 · 0.85 Impact Factor

Preview

Download
12 Downloads
Available from