Article

Evaluation of methods for detecting alloantibodies underlying warm autoantibodies.

American Red Cross Blood Services, Southern California Region, Los Angeles 90006, USA.
Transfusion (Impact Factor: 3.53). 02/1999; 39(1):11-6. DOI: 10.1046/j.1537-2995.1999.39199116889.x
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT In pretransfusion testing of patients whose sera contain autoantibodies reacting optimally at 37 degrees C, it must be determined whether alloantibodies are also present. Two approaches, testing a 1-in-5 dilution of patients' sera and the adsorption of sera in the presence of polyethylene glycol (PEG), have been proposed as alternatives to the time-consuming approach of adsorbing sera with ficin- or ZZAP-treated red cells (RBCs). The three approaches were compared.
Patients' sera containing warm autoantibodies, with and without alloantibodies, were retested 1) after dilution (1-in-5) and 2) after adsorption with allogeneic RBCs in the presence of PEG. Results were compared to those after adsorption with ZZAP-treated allogeneic RBCs.
Dilution (1-in-5): Twenty-seven of 119 sera (7/26 [27%] with and 20/93 [22%] without alloantibodies) did not react; one example each of alloanti-D, -E, -e, -Fy(a), and -Jk(a), and two examples of anti-Jk(b) were not detected at a dilution of 1 in 5. Alloantibodies were identified in 5 (19%) of 26 1-in-5 diluted sera containing alloantibodies; 87 (73%) of 119 sera still reacted with all cells and would have required further workup. PEG adsorption: Thirty-nine sera were tested after parallel PEG and ZZAP adsorptions. The PEG adsorptions required a total of 55 aliquots of adsorbing cells and 13.75 hours, whereas ZZAP adsorptions required 61 aliquots and 30.5 hours. All alloantibodies (anti-D [3], -C [2], -c [1], -E [4], -K [2], -Fy(a) [1], -Jk(a) [2], -Jk(b) [1]) reacted in the adsorbed serum-PEG mixtures at a strength equal to or greater than that in the ZZAP-adsorbed sera.
Although the 1-in-5 dilution approach is convenient, only 22 percent of warm autoantibodies without alloantibodies were nonreactive, and 27 percent of alloantibodies of potential clinical significance were not detected. PEG adsorption appears to give similar results to those of ZZAP adsorption, but it has the advantages of eliminating the cost and time of prior treatment of the allogeneic adsorbing cells and of a reduction of at least a 50 percent in adsorption time.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
193 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Various adsorption techniques are available to remove serum autoantibodies and subsequently detect the underlying alloantibody in previously transfused patients with autoimmune haemolytic anaemia. We planned to establish a suitable adsorption technique in our transfusion service which can remove all autoantibodies and detect underlying alloantibodies rapidly, cheaply and effectively. We evaluated 71 direct antiglobulin test-reactive patients with warm AIHA over a period of 20 months. Twenty-three of these 71 patients who had a previous history of blood transfusion or pregnancy and were confirmed carriers of autoantibodies (indirect antiglobulin test-reactive) were considered for the adsorption study. Depending on the adequacy of samples, history of blood transfusion and severity of anaemia either autoadsorption or alloadsorption or both using polyethylene glycol (PEG) or low ionic strength saline (LISS)-papain were performed. Underlying alloantibodies were detected in 7 of the 23 patients (30.4%) and all these were specific to Rhesus antigens. The mean number of alloadsorptions for complete autoantibody removal using PEG was 1.43 which was significantly lower than the 3.9 using the LISS-papain method (p<0.05). The mean time required by PEG alloadsorption and LISS-papain alloadsorption for autoantibody removal was 93.6 minutes and 177.7 minutes, respectively (p<0.05). Discordant results were not observed in any case and identical alloantibodies were detected by both the techniques. We found that the PEG method is a rapid, cheap and effective way to remove autoantibodies and detect underlying alloantibodies.
    Blood transfusion = Trasfusione del sangue 10/2009; 7(4):300-4. · 1.86 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Conventional pretransfusion testing based on hemagglutination assays can be challenging for patients with autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA) because of the presence of auto-antibodies. It has been suggested that deoxyribonucleic acid-based methods could be more efficient in the selection of antigen-matched red blood cell units in those settings. Because of the high risk of alloimmunization of these patients and the labor-intensive nature of adsorption techniques, we decided to evaluate the feasibility of selecting antigen-matched units on the basis of red cell genotyping. We included in our routine red cell genotyping program samples from 7 patients with AIHA presenting a strongly positive direct antiglobulin test. This made the routine compatibility tests difficult. Most patients had previously received transfusions because of warm AIHA. Matched donor units were selected according to the genotype. For all but 1 patient, blood group genotyping could be done on time to allow antigen-matched transfusion. Four patients received antigen-matched red blood cell units based on red cell genotyping and for 1 patient the fact that no matched units were available led us to postpone the transfusion. After each transfusion, the recovery was recorded and considered satisfactory for all transfused patients.
    Translational Research 10/2013; 163(1):36-42. · 3.49 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The aim of this study was to investigate the frequency of autoantibodies with mimicking specificity by using the dilution technique, to assess the usefulness of the combination of the dilution technique and red blood cell (RBC) phenotyping, and to establish a pre-transfusion testing algorithm in patients with warm autoantibodies. Serum samples from 71 patients with warm autoantibodies were tested using the dilution technique. Among them, 25 samples were adsorbed with allogeneic ZZAP (a combination of dithiothreitol and enzyme) or polyethylene glycol (PEG) and their RBC phenotypes were determined. Thirty-nine patients were transfused with our pre-transfusion testing algorithm using a combination of dilution technique and RBC phenotyping. Autoantibodies with mimicking specificity were detected by the dilution technique in 26.8% (19/71) of the patients and most of them were directed against Rh system antigens. The agreement of the results obtained with the dilution technique in combination with RBC phenotyping and those from ZZAP or PEG adsorption was 100% (18/18) in patients who have autoantibodies with mimicking specificity and/or alloantibodies. No clinical symptoms indicating severe acute or delayed hemolytic transfusion reactions were reported in the 39 patients transfused with our pre-transfusion testing algorithm. Autoantibodies with mimicking specificity detected by the dilution technique in patients with warm autoantibodies are relatively frequent, can be discriminated from alloantibodies by employing a combination of dilution technique and RBC phenotyping, and might not appear to cause severe acute or delayed hemolytic transfusion reactions.
    Annals of Laboratory Medicine 09/2013; 33(5):343-8. · 1.48 Impact Factor

Full-text

View
12 Downloads
Available from