From efficacy to effectiveness in community mental health services. PRiSM Psychosis Study. 10.

Section of Community Psychiatry (PRiSM), Institute of Psychiatry, London.
The British Journal of Psychiatry (Impact Factor: 6.61). 12/1998; 173:423-7. DOI: 10.1192/bjp.173.5.423
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The PRiSM Psychosis Study investigated the outcomes of community mental health services for epidemiologically representative cases of psychosis in London.
The results presented in the preceding nine papers are interpreted.
(a) The health and social gains reported in experimental studies of community health services are replicable in ordinary clinical settings, and are more effective than hospital-oriented services which they replace. (b) Dilution does occur--these gains are less pronounced than in experimental (efficacy) studies. (c) Both models of community services produced a range of improved outcomes. (d) Some limited extra advantages (in terms of met needs, improved quality of life, and social networks) were found in the intensive sector. (e) There is no consistent evidence that community-oriented services (which include in-patient beds) fail service users, their families or the wider public. On balance the results weigh slightly in favour of the two-team model (for acute and continuing care) in terms of clinical effectiveness, but the general model is almost as effective and is less expensive.
The evidence supports a community-oriented rather than a hospital-oriented approach and there is little difference between the community mental health team models.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Zusammenfassung Der Begriff "Soziotherapie" wird seit vielen Jahren in der Psychiatrie uneinheitlich verwendet. Hufig ist das Verstndnis von einem sozialwissenschaftlichen Ansatz der Behandlung eines psychisch erkrankten Individuums in seiner Umwelt geprgt. Die Einfhrung einer Leistung der Gesetzlichen Krankenversicherung mit dem Namen "ambulante Soziotherapie" (37a SGBV) macht die Interpretation des Gesetzestextes notwendig, um die Voraussetzungen fr eine rztliche Verordnung sowie Ziele und Inhalte der Therapie zu verstehen. Der Begriff wird medizinisch definiert und umfasst Anleitung und Motivation zur Inanspruchnahme ambulanter rztlicher und rztlich verordneter Leistungen, wenn dadurch Krankenhausbehandlung vermieden oder verkrzt werden kann, sowie deren Koordinierung bei Patienten, die nicht in der Lage sind, diese Leistungen selbstndig in Anspruch zu nehmen. Dadurch wird die Indikationsstellung auf eine bestimmte Patientenpopulation eingegrenzt ("Drehtrpsychiatriepatienten"). Eine eigentliche Therapie des Patienten in seiner Umwelt, etwa im Sinne einer komplexen Behandlungsstrategie aus Ergo-, Arbeits-, Milieu-, Psycho- und Sozialtherapie als Leistungsinhalt kann aus dem Gesetzestext nicht abgeleitet werden.
    Der Nervenarzt 06/2003; 74(7):596-600. · 0.80 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The implementation of assertive community treatment (ACT) varies widely. To date, the association between model fidelity and effect has not been investigated in Europe. We investigated the association between model fidelity and outcome in the Dutch mental health system. In a prospective longitudinal study, ACT model fidelity and patient outcomes were assessed in 20 outpatient treatment teams. Patients with severe mental illness (n = 530) participated in the study. Outcomes were assessed 3 times using the Health of the Nation Outcome Scales (HoNOS), the Camberwell Assessment of Need Short Assessment Schedule (CANSAS), and the number of hospital days and homeless days during a 2-year follow-up period. Data were analyzed using multilevel statistics. High ACT model fidelity was associated with better outcomes on the HoNOS and less homeless days. Among all of the ACT ingredients, team structure was associated with better outcomes. No associations were found between ACT model fidelity, number of hospital days, and CANSAS scores. Our evidence supports the importance of model fidelity for improving patient outcomes.
    Canadian journal of psychiatry. Revue canadienne de psychiatrie 03/2011; 56(3):154-60. · 2.48 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: For too long there have been heated debates between those who believe that mental health care should be largely or solely provided from hospitals and those who adhere to the view that community care should fully replace hospitals. The aim of this study was to propose a conceptual model relevant for mental health service development in low-, medium- and high-resource settings worldwide. Method We conducted a review of the relevant peer-reviewed evidence and a series of surveys including more than 170 individual experts with direct experience of mental health system change worldwide. We integrated data from these multiple sources to develop the balanced care model (BCM), framed in three sequential steps relevant to different resource settings. RESULTS: Low-resource settings need to focus on improving the recognition and treatment of people with mental illnesses in primary care. Medium-resource settings in addition can develop 'general adult mental health services', namely (i) out-patient clinics, (ii) community mental health teams (CMHTs), (iii) acute in-patient services, (iv) community residential care and (v) work/occupation. High-resource settings, in addition to primary care and general adult mental health services, can also provide specialized services in these same five categories. CONCLUSIONS: The BCM refers both to a balance between hospital and community care and to a balance between all of the service components (e.g. clinical teams) that are present in any system, whether this is in low-, medium- or high-resource settings. The BCM therefore indicates that a comprehensive mental health system includes both community- and hospital-based components of care.
    Psychological Medicine 07/2012; · 5.59 Impact Factor


Available from
Jul 3, 2014