Clearance of iopromide during haemodialysis with high- and low-flux membranes.

Department of Internal Medicine, University of Muenster, Münster, Germany.
Acta Radiologica (Impact Factor: 1.33). 04/1999; 40(2):220-3. DOI: 10.3109/02841859909177743
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The present clinical trial addressed the clearance of the contrast medium iopromide, a middle-sized molecule, during dialysis with high- and low-flux membranes.
Twenty chronic haemodialysis patients without residual renal function were dialysed either with low-flux haemophan or high-flux polyamide directly after application of the contrast medium. Iodine concentrations were determined by radiofluorescence methods.
Plasma concentrations of iodine before dialysis ranged between 1.1 and 3.9 mg/ml. The mean clearance rates for both membranes were comparable (110+/-1.4 ml/min high-flux and 108+/-1.9 ml/min low-flux), the sieving-coefficient was 0.83 for both membranes. After three hours of dialysis, 58% (high-flux) and 62% (low-flux) of iopromide was removed, half time of elimination was reached after 140+/-16 min (high-flux) and 122+/-11 min (low-flux).
Our results demonstrated that elimination of iopromide is not dependent on the pore size of the membrane during dialysis. Due to higher blood flow rate, we found a higher elimination rate and a reduced half-time of elimination than prior investigations.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: •A frequent and expensive problem. Ninety percent of contrast media nephrotoxicity (CMN) occur in patients with pre-existing kidney failure. Its aggravation may require early chronic dialysis.•Preventive measures. CMN prophylaxis is important in these patients. Pre- and post-hydration, with infusion of isotonic saline solution or sodium bicarbonate, and reduction of contrast medium (CM) volume to the strict minimum are essential for preventing CM-induced kidney failure.•The interest of prophylactic hemodialysis and hemofiltration. An interesting approach in preventing CMN is the early elimination of the CM with dialysis techniques. Preventive hemodialysis does not reduce the risk of CMN, but hemofiltration has shown significant efficacy in a population of patients with kidney failure.•The interest of immediate hemodialysis in chronic hemodialysis patients. Although nephrotoxicity is no longer a problem in patients undergoing chronic hemodialysis, CM, especially in high-dose injections, may be responsible for fluid and electrolyte abnormalities and/or volemic expansion. No data yet justify a conclusion that a hemodialysis session immediately after injection of a CM in chronic dialysis patients might be helpful.
    Presse Medicale. 01/2005; 34(11):803-808.
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Haemodialysis for the elimination of contrast medium in patients with advanced renal failure is a common procedure. Even though sufficient elimination with the use of regular low-flux membranes is documented, large differences in results have been reported in prior investigations. We, therefore, compared Cuprophan and polysulfone dialysers with different surface areas to haemofiltration with different amounts of substitution fluid in 40 patients with compromised renal function after coronary angiography. Plasma iodine concentrations were measured by fluorescent excitation analysis. At constant blood flow rates of 200 ml/min, Cuprophan membranes with 1. 3 m(2) surface area had a clearance rate of 87 ml/min, whereas polysulfone membranes of comparable size displayed a significantly higher clearance rate of 147 ml/min. Polysulfone membranes with 1.8 m(2) surface area showed a small but insignificant increase in the iodine clearance (162 ml/min), while Cuprophan membranes displayed an increase in clearance rates (121 ml/min). Additional ultrafiltration led to a further increase in the plasma clearance of both membranes and reduced urinary iodine excretion. Haemofiltration was comparable to haemodialysis in terms of efficacy and thus represents an alternative method. Clearance of iopromide during haemodialysis with polysulfone membranes is higher than with Cuprophan membranes. Elimination rates can be further increased by additional ultrafiltration. Haemofiltration is comparable to haemodialysis regarding contrast medium elimination.
    American Journal of Nephrology 01/2000; 20(4):300-4. · 2.62 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Spectral measurements were performed of direct beam and global solar irradiance at normal incidence. The measurements were taken at Sede Boqer, during noontime, on a selection of cloudless days during the period December 2001 - March 2002. For those days having a low level of diffuse radiation, the ratios of direct beam to global spectra were found to follow a previously suggested, semi-empirical, 2-parameter formula based on Rayleigh scattering. For one of the days, with an unusually high level of diffuse radiation, this formula did not provide an adequate fit to the data. In order to provide an adequate fit it was found necessary to effect an ad hoc modification to the algebraic form of the original formula.