Caries conditions among 2-5-year-old immigrant Latino children related to parent's oral health knowledge, opinions and practices

Baltimore College of Dental Surgery Dental School, University of Maryland, 21201-1586, USA.
Community Dentistry And Oral Epidemiology (Impact Factor: 2.03). 03/1999; 27(1):8-15. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0528.1999.tb01986.x
Source: PubMed


To collect baseline data prior to initiating a community-based, oral health promotion program in an inner city Latino community in Washington DC, populated by Central American immigrants.
In 1995, an oral survey of a convenience sample of children 2-5 years of age (n = 142) and a survey of the knowledge, opinions and practices (KOP) of their parents (n = 121) were completed. Clinical data of children were matched with parent respondents of the KOP survey. Data were analyzed for statistical associations using univariate odds ratios, Fisher's exact tests, and multiple logistic regression.
Only 53% of the children were caries free. Eighteen percent of all children were in need of immediate dental care and 26% were in need of early or non-urgent dental care. Only 7% of the parents knew the purpose of sealants and 52% knew the purpose of fluorides. Further, only 9% thought that brushing with toothpaste can prevent tooth decay The strongest predictors of dental caries in this population, after adjusting for child's age and mother's education, were recency of mother's residence in the United States and report of an uncooperative child when attempting toothbrushing.
Regimens of caries prevention have been successful in reducing dental decay for a large segment of the US population, yet this disease remains prevalent especially among low socioeconomic groups. The oral health status of the children and the oral health KOP of the parents in this community are disturbingly deficient.

Download full-text


Available from: Alice M Horowitz, Jun 12, 2015
  • Source
    • "Behaviorally–mediated risk factors which include cariogenic diet, poor oral hygiene, and unattended bottle feedings in the first two years of life are all associated with ECC [10,11]. These oral health behaviors are related to inappropriate information, a belief that baby teeth are not important, mothers’ previous negative experiences with oral health care, and difficult experiences brushing children’s teeth [12-14]. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This randomized control trial assesses the effectiveness of motivational interviewing (MI) to encourage behavior change in new mothers relating to caries prevention when caring for their newborn American Indian (AI) infants and young AI children. The study is a randomized control trial. We hypothesize that when motivational interviewing is added to enhanced community oral health education services, the new mothers will achieve greater reduction of caries experience in their AI children compared to those who are receiving enhanced community services (ECS) alone. Six hundred mothers or caregivers of AI newborns will be enrolled into the study and randomized to one of the two intervention groups over a two-year period. The children will be followed until the child's third birthday. A cost analysis of the study is being conducted in tandem with the enhanced community services, motivational interviewing behavioral interventions, and the dental screenings for the length of the study. The trial is now in the implementation phase and a number of threats to successful completion, such as recruitment and retention challenges in a vast, rural geographic area, have been addressed. The protocol provides a unique model for oral health interventions using principles of community-based participatory research and is currently on schedule to meet study objectives. If the study is successful, motivational interviewing intervention can be applied in AI communities to reduce ECC disparities in this disadvantaged population, with study of further applicability in other populations and settings.Trial registration: NCT01116726.
    Trials 04/2014; 15(1):125. DOI:10.1186/1745-6215-15-125 · 1.73 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "United States Wennhall et al. 2002, 2005, 2008 (10) (41) (43) Sweden Cross-sectional Studies Almerich-Silla et al. 2007 (32) Spain Bissar et al. 2007 (33) Germany Brugman et al. 1998 (62) The Netherlands Carvalho et al. 2004 (34) Belgium Cote et al. 2004 (35) United States Davies et al. 1997 (36) Australia Dykes 2002 (63) United Kingdom Ferro 2007a–c (37) (64) (65) Italy Geltman et al. 2001 (66) United States Godson et al. 2006 (30) United Kingdom Gray et al. 2000 (67) United Kingdom Grembowski et al. 2007 (68) United States Guendelman et al. 2005 (69) United States Haubek et al. 2006 (70) Denmark Hayes et al. 1998 (71) United States Hjern 2000 (72) Sweden Hobson et al. 2007 (45) United States Huang et al. 2006 (73) United States Kalbeek et al. 1996 (74) The Netherlands Kim et al. 2004 (75) United States Liu et al. 2007 (76) United States Matsson et al. 2005 (39) Sweden Meropol et al. 1995 (77) United States Podgore et al. 1998 (78) United States Qiu et al. 2003 (79) United States Quandt et al. 2007 (80) United States Schluter et al. 2007 (81) New Zealand Skeie et al. 2005, 2006 (40) (82) Norway Stecksen-Blicks et al. 1999, 2004 (83) (84) Sweden Sundby and Petersen 2003 (46) Denmark Tiong et al. 2006 (85) Australia Wang et al. 1996 (86) Norway Watson et al. 1999 (87) United States Weinstein et al. 1996 (88) Canada White et al. 1996 (31) United Kingdom Willems et al. 2005 (89) Belgium Woodward et al. 1996 (90) Canada Qualitative Studies Hilton et al. 2007 (91) United States Wong et al. 2005 (92) United States communities in high-income countries is worse than that of the host population. To better address these inequalities, it is essential to recognize the impact of the cultural context, for example, acculturation , attitudes and beliefs, trauma, as well as inclusion and discrimination, with both individual and community beliefs and practices being key social determinants of oral health status. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Traditional assessment of research quality addresses aspects of scientific rigor, however, ensuring barriers to participation by people of different cultural backgrounds are addressed requires cultural competence. The aim of this research was to assess the cultural competence of oral health research conducted with migrant children. A protocol was developed with explicit inclusion and exclusion criteria. Electronic databases were searched from 1995 to 2009. Each study was assessed for cultural competence using the assessment criteria and a template developed as a proof-of-concept approach. Of the 2059 articles identified, 58 met inclusion criteria (n = 48 studies). There were four (8.3%) cohort studies, five (10.4%) intervention studies, 37 (77.1%) quantitative cross-sectional studies, and two (4.2%) were qualitative studies. Overall, migrant children had worse oral health outcomes in all studies compared with their host-country counterparts. All studies rated poorly in the cultural competence assessment. Appropriate inclusion of all potentially vulnerable groups in research will result in better estimates and understandings of oral health, and more reliable recommendations for prevention and management.
    Community Dentistry And Oral Epidemiology 07/2013; 42(1). DOI:10.1111/cdoe.12058 · 2.03 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "In Latino farmworker families, compared with foreign-born children, those local-born had a better oral health, as rated by mothers (bivariate analysis) [32]. Among Hispanic preschool children, being born in the United States, speaking English [33], and mother’s longer residence in the United States [44] implied lower rate of early childhood caries. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The impact of acculturation on systemic health has been extensively investigated and is regarded as an important explanatory factor for health disparity. However, information is limited and fragmented on the oral health implications of acculturation. This study aimed to review the current evidence on the oral health impact of acculturation. Papers were retrieved from five electronic databases. Twenty-seven studies were included in this review. Their scientific quality was rated and key findings were summarized. Seventeen studies investigated the impacts of acculturation on the utilization of dental services; among them, 16 reported positive associations between at least one acculturation indicator and use of dental services. All 15 studies relating acculturation to oral diseases (dental caries and periodontal disease) suggested better oral health among acculturated individuals. Evidence is lacking to support that better oral health of acculturated immigrants is attributable to their improved dental attendance. Further researches involving other oral health behaviors and diseases and incorporating refined acculturation scales are needed. Prospective studies will facilitate the understanding on the trajectory of immigrants' oral health along the acculturation continuum.
    Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health 11/2010; 13(2):202-13. DOI:10.1007/s10903-010-9414-9 · 1.16 Impact Factor
Show more