Article

Psychopathology and attrition in the Baltimore ECA 15-year follow-up 1981-1996

Westat, RA, Rockville, Maryland 20850-3129, USA.
Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology (Impact Factor: 2.58). 03/1999; 34(2):91-8. DOI: 10.1007/s001270050117
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Predictors of non-response were investigated in a 15-year follow-up (1981-1996) of 3,481 individuals in a probability sample from the household population of East Baltimore. Demographics (age, sex, race, education, marital status, and unemployment), household factors (living arrangements, household income, household size, and number of children), cultural variables (ancestral ethnicity and foreign language), social variables (social support and networks, committing felony, carrying a weapon, using an alias, and wandering), health factors (physical illness, health insurance, medical assistance, Medicare, receiving disability benefits, social security, and welfare), interviewer's observation, and psychopathologic variables (mental disorders, suicide behavior, comorbidity, and drug use) were collected at baseline in 1981 and in 1982, then linked to follow-up data between 1993 and 1996. A tracing process involving mail, phone, criss-cross directories, motor vehicle administration records, a commercial credit bureau, the state criminal justice system, hospital records, the US National Death Index, and field tracing were used to locate the original sample. A total of 3,066 respondents of the original sample (88.1%) were traced. Non-response was categorized into Sample Mortality (that part of the original sample that died during follow-up), Sample Loss (that part of the original sample that survived but could not be found) and Refusal (that part of the original sample that survived and was found but refused to participate). Stratified analysis and adjusted multiple logistic regression modeling found sample mortality and sample loss were strongly influenced by individual and household variables and by psychopathology. Sample mortality was influenced by specific mental disorders or conditions as mania, drug abuse/dependency, antisocial personality, cognitive impairment, alcohol abuse/dependency, phobia, drug use (except PCP), and comorbidity. Household factors protective against mortality include higher household income, not living as extended members in a married couple family, and living with children in the household. Persons who were unemployed, widowed or single, without high school education, male, and 65 years of age or older were more likely to die. Sample loss was influenced by cognitive impairment, antisocial personality, and cocaine use. Household factors linked to sample loss include living in female-headed families, or non-family households, and living alone. Young nonwhite, divorced/separated, without high school education, and unemployed were also harder to find. Refusal was associated with being white, with incomplete elementary education, living as a spouse in traditional married couple families, or as a child in female-headed families. Psychopathology did not influence refusal.

1 Follower
 · 
181 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: El presente estudio comparó la estructura latente de los trastornos de personalidad (TP) clasificada en el Manual Diagnóstico y Estadístico de los Trastornos Mentales, cuarta edición, con el modelo de cinco factores (MCF) de las dimensiones de la personalidad general. En el estudio se incluyó a 742 individuos que residían en la comunidad y participaban en el Hopkins Epidemiology of Personality Disorders Study. Utilizando el International Personality Disorder Examination los psicólogos evaluaron los TP clasificados en el Manual Diagnóstico y Estadístico de los Trastornos Mentales, cuarta edición y las dimensiones TP se derivaron previamente utilizando un análisis de factor dicotómico. Se administró a todos los individuos el Revised NEO Personality Inventory, un parámetro del MCF. La relación entre las dos series de conceptos teóricos relacionados con la personalidad se examinó utilizando un marco de validez del concepto teórico y, asimismo, coeficientes de correlación de Pearson, modelos de regresión lineal múltiples y modelos de regresión spline. Cada uno de los cinco factores de TP manifestó correlaciones ligeras o moderadas con diversas dimensiones NEO; en conjunto, el dominio NEO y las puntuaciones de faceta explicaron de una quinta a una tercera parte de la variancia en las dimensiones TP. Se identificaron ejemplos de relaciones no lineales entre las dimensiones de la personalidad. Se observó una correspondencia modesta entre las dimensiones TP y los rasgos de MCF, y éstos sólo explicaron parcialmente la variancia de los TP. Los parámetros dimensionales de la personalidad general pueden ser una alternativa apropiada al Manual Diagnóstico y Estadístico de los Trastornos Mentales, cuarta edición. Si los rasgos de inadaptación adicionales definen mejor el dominio de los TP sigue siendo un objetivo importante de la investigación futura.
    10/2008; 15(5):153-161. DOI:10.1016/S1134-5934(08)76486-8
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background Medical researchers often use longitudinal observational studies to examine how risk factors predict change in health over time. Selective attrition and inappropriate modeling of regression toward the mean (RTM) are two potential sources of bias in such studies. Method The current study used Monte Carlo simulations to examine bias related to selective attrition and inappropriate modeling of RTM in the study of prediction of change. This was done for multiple regression (MR) and change score analysis. Results MR provided biased results when attrition was dependent on follow-up and baseline variables to quite substantial degrees, while results from change score analysis were biased when attrition was more strongly dependent on variables at one time point than the other. A positive association between the predictor and change in the health variable was underestimated in MR and overestimated in change score analysis due to selective attrition. Inappropriate modeling of RTM, on the other hand, lead to overestimation of this association in MR and underestimation in change score analysis. Hence, selective attrition and inappropriate modeling of RTM biased the results in opposite directions. Conclusion MR and change score analysis are both quite robust against selective attrition. The interplay between selective attrition and inappropriate modeling of RTM emphasizes that it is not an easy task to assess the degree to which obtained results from empirical studies are over- versus underestimated due to attrition or RTM. Researchers should therefore use modern techniques for handling missing data and be careful to model RTM appropriately.
    BMC Medical Research Methodology 12/2014; 14(133). DOI:10.1186/1471-2288-14-133 · 2.17 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Using lifetime data from two waves of the National Epidemiologic Surveys on Alcohol and Related Conditions, this study sought to examine sex- and race-specific risks in the temporal relationship between adult onset severe physical intimate partner violence (IPV) victimization and alcohol misuse (binge drinking) and alcohol use disorders (abuse and dependence) and whether or not childhood trauma moderated these relationships among U.S. non-Hispanic White and Black women and men. IPV predicted most alcohol outcomes among White and Black women and White men. Conversely, binge drinking among White and Black women and alcohol abuse among Black women and men predicted IPV. Childhood trauma moderated the relationship between IPV and alcohol misuse mainly among Black respondents, with an increased risk of either outcome among those without childhood trauma. These findings suggest a reciprocal relationship between IPV victimization and alcohol misuse, with implications for sex- and race-specific prevention and intervention efforts.
    Journal of Family Violence 11/2014; 29(8):815-828. DOI:10.1007/s10896-014-9635-0 · 1.17 Impact Factor