Creating a clinical nutrition registry: prospects, problems, and preliminary results.

Department of Human Nutrition and Dietetics, University of Illinois at Chicago 60612, USA.
Journal of the American Dietetic Association (Impact Factor: 3.8). 05/1999; 99(4):467-70. DOI: 10.1016/S0002-8223(99)00115-7
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT There is a tremendous gap in the information available to support the practice of hospital-based dietitians and to address the issue of how the risk of developing protein-energy malnutrition can be avoided in the majority of patients. This article describes the rationale and benefits of creating a nutrition registry of within-hospital clinical nutrition care. A nutrition registry is made up of observational data, collected on an ongoing basis, of nutritional interventions provided to hospitalized patients. It is the first step in data gathering to demonstrate the effectiveness of clinical nutrition interventions. The methods and preliminary results of a nutrition registry that was established at The University of Illinois Medical Center, Chicago, III, are presented. Using subjective global assessment, 55% (257 of 467) of patients at admission and 60% (280 of 467) of patients at discharge were moderately or severely malnourished. Patients that were normal nourished at admission and became moderately or severely malnourished had higher hospital charges ($40,329 for moderately malnourished patients, $76,598 for severely malnourished patients) than those that remained normal nourished ($28,368). This pattern held independent of admission nutritional status. Major challenges in implementation of a registry into the responsibilities of the staff dietitian are reviewed. The conclusion of this study is that nutrition registries can be established and will provide the much needed baseline data to document the impact of nutrition interventions on outcomes of medical care.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Introduction: The nutritional registries are data bases through which we obtain the information to understand the nutrition of populations. Several main nutrition societies of the world have these types of registries, outstanding the NADYA (Home artificial and Ambulatory nutrition) group in Spain. The object of this study is to determine by means of a systematic review, the existent scientific production in the international data bases referred to nutritional support registries. Methods: Descriptive transversal study of the results of a critical bibliographic research done in the bioscience data bases: MEDLINE, EMBASE, The Cochrane Library, ISI (Web of Sciences), LILACS, CINHAL. Results: A total of 20 original articles related to nutritional registries were found and recovered. Eleven registries of eight countries were identified: Australia, Germany, Italy, Japan, Spain, Sweden, United Status and United Kingdom. The Price Index was of 65% and all the articles were published in the last 20 years. Conclusions: The Price Index highlights the innovativeness of this practice. The articles related to nutritional support are heterogeneous with respect to data and population, which exposes this as a limitation for a combined analysis.
    Nutricion hospitalaria: organo oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Nutricion Parenteral y Enteral 12/2009; 24(6):711-716. · 1.31 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Objetivo: Comparar medidas de evaluación del estado nutricional en el momento de la internación y en la alta hospitalaria, en pacientes de clínica quirúrgica, recibiendo atendimiento nutricional convencional (ANC). Casuística y método: Han sido estudiados 183 pacientes, siendo 54,6% del sexo femenino y 45,4% del sexo masculino con edad entre 30 y 60 años, internados en clínica quirúrgica del HMCP, Puc-Campinas. Para la coleta de los datos ha sido utilizado un protocolo de atendimiento nutricional con dados de identificación y diagnóstico, los cuales han sido colectados de los prontuarios médicos, antecedentes personales, antropometría, historia alimentar en la internación, consumo energético total de la dieta habitual (CE), necesidad energética (NE) y estado nutricional. Para el análisis estadístico ha sido aplicado el teste de Wilcoxon, y para verificar la concordancia del estado nutricional en la internación con el estado nutricional en la alta hospitalaria, ha sido aplicado el Coeficiente Kappa (k). El nivel de significancia adoptado ha sido 5% (0,05). Resultados: El análisis de los valores de la internación y de la alta hospitalaria ha mostrado que el estado nutricional se ha mantenido en los 2 momentos, cuando analizados por grupos de enfermedades. La relación entre el estado nutricional en la internación y en la alta hospitalaria, en pacientes con enfermedades benignas de vías biliares y enfermedades vasculares, ha presentado excelente concordancia entre los dos momentos (k = 1,000). Se ha verificado que, descontando el efecto del acaso, el estado nutricional en la internación y en la alta concordaron en 71,43% y 50,0%, respectivamente, en estas dos situaciones clínicas, cuanto al diagnóstico nutricional de eutrofia. En las enfermedades benignas del aparato digestivo y en las neoplasias, también ha sido observada buena concordancia (k = 0,887 e k = 0,820, respectivamente). En la muestra total, este análisis de concordancia ha sido alto (k = 0,918), indicando que el estado nutricional se ha mantenido durante el período de internación. Conclusión: Tales hallados pueden atribuirse al monitoreo del estado nutricional de rutina, que permite un aporte adecuado durante el período de internación, aún habiendo diferencia entre necesidad y consumo energético.
    Nutricion hospitalaria: organo oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Nutricion Parenteral y Enteral 08/2007; 22(4):447-454. · 1.31 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: INTRODUCTION: To assess the nutritional status of hospitalized patients is important for the prevention of hospital malnutrition and planning of nutritional intervention. OBJECTIVE: To comparatively analyze the nutritional status of patients admitted to two hospitals, one public and another private, caring for populations with different socioeconomic profiles. CASE STUDY AND METHODS: This was a prospective study and samples were collected from patients of two hospitals, one public (PUH) and another private (PRH), which respectively represent the underprivileged and the more affluent populations. The analysis considered 51 patients from the PUH, aged between 53.9 ± 15.6 years and 51 from the PRH, aged between 55.0 ± 13.9 years, paired and grouped according to the following diseases: neoplasia (n+25), digestive tract disorders (n+11) and others (n+15). The statistical analysis was made by means of the T-Student test to compare PUH and PRH variables with p < 0.05, as well as to compare different variables in the same hospital, with p < 0.05; p < 0.01; p < 0.005 and p < 0.001. RESULTS: There were no statistical differences when the variables evaluated in both hospitals were compared, except for the length of hospitalization of patients with digestive tract disorders, which was longer for HPR. Upon hospitalization, 21.0% and 17.6% presented a body mass index (BMI) indicative of malnutrition. The patients with neoplasias presented current weight (CW) lower than habitual weight (HW). Both the patients with neoplasias and those with digestive tract disorders presented insufficient energy consumption in the period before hospitalization (p < 0.05). A negative correlation was found between the length of hospitalization and the current weight/habitual weight ratio (r = 0.194, 0 < 0.05, n = 102) and BMI (r=-0.186, p < 0.05, n = 102), according to Pearson's coefficient. CONCLUSION: The similarity of nutritional conditions found points to similarity of nutritional status for patients of both institutions and reflects the changes in the nutritional status of the population. The nutritional intervention should consider the nutritional needs of the population assisted.
    Nutricion hospitalaria: organo oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Nutricion Parenteral y Enteral 02/2006; 21(1):32-37. · 1.31 Impact Factor