Fear of people by cows and effects on milk yield, behavior, and heart rate at milking.

Dairy and Swine Research and Development Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Lennoxville, QC, Canada.
Journal of Dairy Science (Impact Factor: 2.55). 05/1999; 82(4):720-7. DOI: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(99)75289-6
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT To examine the ability of cows to recognize people and the effects of the fear of people by cows at milking, cows (n = 14) were handled by two people; one handled the cows gently, and the other handled them aversively. The handlers wore clothes of different color. After handling, the cows stood further from the aversive handler than from the gentle handler. When the handlers changed the color of their clothing, the cows did not discriminate between them. The gentle handler stood close to the cows for one milking, and the aversive handler stood close to the cows for another milking. For two control milkings, neither handler was present. Measurements included milking duration, milk yield, residual milk, heart rates, incidence of movement, and kicking behavior of the cows. Compared with control milkings, the presence of the gentle handler did not change milk yield or residual milk. The presence of the aversive handler increased residual milk by 70%. Kicking behavior of cows during milking was reduced with either handler present, and kicking during udder preparation was reduced with the aversive handler present. For cows that best discriminated between the handlers, the presence of the aversive handler increased movement and heart rate during milking. For cows that did not discriminate well between the handlers, the presence of either handler increased heart rate and decreased movement during milking. Cows recognized individual people, and the fear of people who are present during milking may reduce milk yield.

Download full-text


Available from: Jeffrey Rushen, Jun 20, 2015
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The effect of pre-partum habituation on buffalo heifers’ behaviour in the milking parlour.•The effect of pre-partum habituation on lactation performance of buffalo heifers.•Pre-partum habituated buffaloes performed fewer steps and kicks during milking.•Pre-partum habituation did not significantly affect milk flow variables or milk quality.•Pre-partum habituation can reduce restlessness in buffalo heifers during milking.
    Applied Animal Behaviour Science 10/2014; 161. DOI:10.1016/j.applanim.2014.10.003 · 1.63 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Between-farm variation in animal reactions to humans can reflect different management styles and behavioral tendencies among farmers. Animals are well-known to discriminate among humans, but less clear is the key issue of whether they more or less easily generalize their experience from specific humans to others depending on management style. Here, we chose two contrasted management styles by known handlers: "gentle" management, i.e. long-lasting exposure to positive human interactions (with limited negative interactions), and "aversive" management including long-lasting exposure to various negative human interactions (with only food delivery considered a positive interaction) and aversive events. Over a period of 19 wk, 15 female lambs were exposed to the gentle management treatment ("gently-treated" group) while another 15 lambs ("aversively-treated" group) were exposed to the aversive management treatment. To facilitate discrimination by animals, experimenters wore white clothes for aversive events and green clothes for farming handling (positive handling and feeding for the gently-treated group and only feeding for the aversively-treated group). Sheep perception of the human was assessed after the management period by submitting lambs from each group to two standardized tests: i) the presence of a stationary human (familiar human in white vs. familiar human in green vs. unknown human) and ii) the presence of a moving human (familiar human in white vs. familiar human in green vs. unknown human). As expected, during the stationary human test, aversively-treated lambs spent less time in the human zone (P < 0.0001), showed greater latency to approach the human (P = 0.05) and had fewer contacts with the human (P = 0.05) than gently-treated lambs. During the moving human test, aversively-treated lambs also showed a greater escape distance from humans than gently-treated lambs (P < 0.0001). Aversively-treated lambs showed the same fear responses towards familiar and unknown humans and tended to generalize their aversive experiences with one handler to all humans. In contrast, gently-treated lambs seemed to discriminate familiar humans from unfamiliar humans. Different management styles could modulate farm generalization to humans in farm animals.
    Journal of Animal Science 09/2013; 91(11). DOI:10.2527/jas.2012-5654 · 1.92 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In 2012, the World Organisation for Animal Health adopted 10 'General Principles for the Welfare of Animals in Livestock Production Systems' to guide the development of animal welfare standards. The General Principles draw on half a century of scientific research relevant to animal welfare: (1) how genetic selection affects animal health, behaviour and temperament; (2) how the environment influences injuries and the transmission of diseases and parasites; (3) how the environment affects resting, movement and the performance of natural behaviour; (4) the management of groups to minimize conflict and allow positive social contact; (5) the effects of air quality, temperature and humidity on animal health and comfort; (6) ensuring access to feed and water suited to the animals' needs and adaptations; (7) prevention and control of diseases and parasites, with humane euthanasia if treatment is not feasible or recovery is unlikely; (8) prevention and management of pain; (9) creation of positive human-animal relationships; and (10) ensuring adequate skill and knowledge among animal handlers. Research directed at animal welfare, drawing on animal behaviour, stress physiology, veterinary epidemiology and other fields, complements more established fields of animal and veterinary science and helps to create a more comprehensive scientific basis for animal care and management.
    The Veterinary Journal 07/2013; 198(1). DOI:10.1016/j.tvjl.2013.06.028 · 2.17 Impact Factor