Apoptosis and its clinical significance for bladder cancer therapy.
Department of Urology, Belfast City Hospital, Belfast.BJU International (Impact Factor: 3.13). 02/1999; 83(1):1-10.
- The Journal of Urology 04/2001; 165(3):946-54. DOI:10.1016/S0022-5347(05)66582-2 · 3.75 Impact Factor
- [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: To investigate Ki-67 and p21Waf1/Cip1 expression and apoptosis, before and after treatment, in tumour biopsies obtained from patients with superficial bladder cancer who underwent vinorelbine intravesical therapy. Twenty patients with high-risk superficial bladder cancer (including one or more of the following parameters: tumour diameter > 3 cm, histological grade 3, or multicentric tumours) were treated 1-6 times (weekly) with intravesical vinorelbine (50 mg/mL) instillations. Transurethral tumour marker biopsies were obtained one week before the first instillation of the drug and one week after the last. The biopsies were immunostained for Ki-67 and p21Waf1/Cip1 with monoclonal antibodies, on tissue sections derived from paraffin-embedded samples obtained before and after vinorelbine treatments. In addition, apoptosis was determined using a terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated dUTP biotin nick-end labelling (TUNEL) technique. There were no significant differences in the cell proliferation marker Ki-67 in biopsies taken before or after treatment. However, p21Waf1/Cip1 showed significantly higher expression in biopsies obtained after vinorelbine treatment, with median (range) values of 40 (20-90)% before and 70 (50-80)% after (P < 0.001, paired nonparametric Wilcoxon test). The apoptotic index was significantly higher after vinorelbine therapy, with median (range) values of 0.89 (0.06-3.8)% before and 2.25 (0.17-18.7)% after treatment (P < 0.001, paired nonparametric Wilcoxon test). Despite the brief treatment and few patients there was a clinical response in nine patients, together with low toxicity in all. The intravesical treatment of tumours with vinorelbine affects p21Waf1/Cip1 expression without blocking cell proliferation, although increasing apoptosis. The preliminary results suggest that vinorelbine may be useful for treating superficial bladder tumours, and thus a phase II study is warranted.BJU International 09/2001; 88(4):425-31. DOI:10.1046/j.1464-410X.2001.02340.x · 3.13 Impact Factor
- [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Bcl-2 is an important determinant of transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder recurrence and progression as well as a factor in patient response to chemotherapy or radiotherapy. We determined Bcl-2 down-regulation after antisense oligonucleotide therapy and synergism with mitomycin C in transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder. Bcl-2 protein was quantified using flow cytometry and immunohistochemistry in 4 bladder cancer cell lines, in bladder washings from 6 patients with carcinoma in situ and in 16 patient tumor samples. The synergistic effects of antisense oligonucleotides G3139 and 2009, and mitomycin C were investigated in 4 cell lines, while 2009 down-regulation was examined in 20 tumor explants in an ex vivo model. Bcl-2 protein expression was found in all 4 cell lines and in 5 of the 6 cell populations derived from patients with carcinoma in situ. Of the 16 tumors 7 were classified positive by frozen section immunohistochemistry and quantitative flow cytometry. G3139 and 2009 down-regulated Bcl-2 protein expression in all 4 cell lines and 2009 down-regulated Bcl-2 protein expression in half of the Bcl-2 positive tumor specimens. There was only evidence in 1 cell line, T24/83, that Bcl-2 protein expression down-regulation enhanced mitomycin C induced apoptotic cell death. Bcl-2 was expressed in a significant proportion of bladder tumors and in carcinoma in situ. Therefore, antisense oligonucleotides represent a viable strategy for Bcl-2 protein down-regulation. However, it may not always translate into an increased level of mitomycin C induced apoptosis in transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder.The Journal of Urology 10/2001; 166(3):1098-105. DOI:10.1016/S0022-5347(05)65929-0 · 3.75 Impact Factor
Data provided are for informational purposes only. Although carefully collected, accuracy cannot be guaranteed. The impact factor represents a rough estimation of the journal's impact factor and does not reflect the actual current impact factor. Publisher conditions are provided by RoMEO. Differing provisions from the publisher's actual policy or licence agreement may be applicable.