Job stress and job performance controversy: an empirical assessment.

Concordia University Canada
Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 03/1984; 33(1):1-21. DOI: 10.1016/0030-5073(84)90009-6
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT This study examined the relationship between job stress and employees' performance and withdrawal behavior among nurses (N = 440) in two hospitals in a metropolitan Canadian city on the east coast. Job stressors assessed included role ambiguity, role overload, role conflict, and resource inadequacy. Employees' performance was operationalized in terms of job performance, motivation, and patient care skill. Withdrawal behaviors assessed were absenteeism, tardiness, and anticipated turnover. Multiple regressions, curvilinear correlation coefficients, and canonical correlations were computed to test the nature of the relationship between stressors and the criterion variables of the study. In general, data were more supportive of the negative linear relationship between stress and performance than for positive linear or curvilinear relationship. However, the stressor role ambiguity did exhibit a monotonic nonlinear relationship with a number of criterion variables. Employees' professional and organizational commitment were proposed to moderate the stress-performance relationship. However, the data only partially supported the role of the moderators.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To investigate the shape of the relationship between stress resulting from excessive demand and performance, 306 officer cadets in the Israel Defence Forces completed stress questionnaires during their training. Stress was consistently negatively related to various measures of performance. The prediction derived from the inverted-U hypothesis, that those whose ability exceeded demand and those who felt that demands taxed their ability would perform worse than those whose ability matched their demands, was not supported. Until all the requisite conditions for testing the inverted-U hypothesis are met, the authors propose relegating it to the laboratory.
    Work and Stress 04/1996; 10(2):165-173. DOI:10.1080/02678379608256795 · 3.00 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Subjects were 200 managerial and nonmanagerial American women and men (112 female, 88 male) who were tested for degree of sex role conflict (SRC) and various work-related attitudes and outcomes. Both gender and hierarchical differences were analyzed. Results showed that SRC was related to low job involvement for managerial women but not for nonmanagerial women or for men at any rank; it was negatively correlated with professional commitment for both female and male managers but not for nonmanagerial subjects of either sex. Overall, women scored higher than men in SRC but were not significantly different in levels of job involvement, job satisfaction, organizational commitment, professional commitment, or propensity to leave the organization. Managerial women scored higher in SRC than nonmanagerial women.
    The Journal of Social Psychology 12/1989; 129(6):779-791. DOI:10.1080/00224545.1989.9712086 · 0.64 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: We introduce social networks theory and methods as a way of understanding mentoring in the current career context. We first introduce a typology of "developmental networks" using core concepts from social networks theory-network diversity and tie strength-to view mentoring as a multiple relationship phenomenon. We then propose a framework illustrating factors that shape developmental network structures and offer propositions focusing on the developmental consequences for individuals having different types of developmental networks in their careers. We conclude with strategies both for testing our propositions and for researching multiple developmental relationships further.
    The Academy of Management Review 04/2001; 26(2):264. DOI:10.2307/259122 · 6.17 Impact Factor