DIX domains of Dvl and axin are necessary for protein interactions and their ability to regulate beta-catenin stability.

Department of Biochemistry, Hiroshima University School of Medicine, Minami-ku, Hiroshima 734-8551, Japan.
Molecular and Cellular Biology (Impact Factor: 5.04). 07/1999; 19(6):4414-22.
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The N-terminal region of Dvl-1 (a mammalian Dishevelled homolog) shares 37% identity with the C-terminal region of Axin, and this related region is named the DIX domain. The functions of the DIX domains of Dvl-1 and Axin were investigated. By yeast two-hybrid screening, the DIX domain of Dvl-1 was found to interact with Dvl-3, a second mammalian Dishevelled relative. The DIX domains of Dvl-1 and Dvl-3 directly bound one another. Furthermore, Dvl-1 formed a homo-oligomer. Axin also formed a homo-oligomer, and its DIX domain was necessary. The N-terminal region of Dvl-1, including its DIX domain, bound to Axin directly. Dvl-1 inhibited Axin-promoted glycogen synthase kinase 3beta-dependent phosphorylation of beta-catenin, and the DIX domain of Dvl-1 was required for this inhibitory activity. Expression of Dvl-1 in L cells induced the nuclear accumulation of beta-catenin, and deletion of the DIX domain abolished this activity. Although expression of Axin in SW480 cells caused the degradation of beta-catenin and reduced the cell growth rate, expression of an Axin mutant that lacks the DIX domain did not affect the level of beta-catenin or the growth rate. These results indicate that the DIX domains of Dvl-1 and Axin are important for protein-protein interactions and that they are necessary for the ability of Dvl-1 and Axin to regulate the stability of beta-catenin.

  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Wnt signaling generates pattern in all embryos, from flies and worms to humans, and promotes the undifferentiated, proliferative state critical for stem cells in adult tissues. Inappropriate Wnt pathway activation is the major cause of colorectal cancers, a leading cause of cancer death in humans. Although this pathway has been studied extensively for years, large gaps remain in our understanding of how it switches on and off, and how its activation changes cellular behaviors. Much of what is known about the pathway comes from genetic studies in Drosophila, where a single Wnt molecule, encoded by wingless (wg), directs an array of cell-fate decisions similar to those made by the combined activities of all 19 Wnt family members in vertebrates. Although Wg specifies fate in many tissues, including the brain, limbs and major organs, the fly embryonic epidermis has proven to be a very powerful system for dissecting pathway activity. It is a simple, accessible tissue, with a pattern that is highly sensitive to small changes in Wg pathway activity. This review discusses what we have learned about Wnt signaling from studying mutations that disrupt epidermal pattern in the fly embryo, highlights recent advances and controversies in the field, and sets these issues in the context of questions that remain about how this essential signaling pathway functions. Mol. Reprod. Dev. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
    Molecular Reproduction and Development 11/2013; 80(11). DOI:10.1002/mrd.22228 · 2.68 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Wnts activate at least two signaling pathways, the β-catenin-dependent and -independent pathways. Although the β-catenin-dependent pathway is known to contribute to G1/S transition, involvement of the β-catenin-independent pathway in cell cycle regulation remains unclear. Here, we show that Wnt5a signaling, which activates the β-catenin-independent pathway, is required for cytokinesis. Dishevelled 2 (Dvl2), a mediator of Wnt signaling pathways, was localized to the midbody during cytokinesis. Beside the localization of Dvl2, Fz2, a Wnt receptor, was detected in the midbody with an endosomal sorting complex required for transport III (ESCRT-III) subunit, CHMP4B. Depletion of Wnt5a, its receptors, and Dvl increased multinucleated cells. The phenotype observed in Wnt5a-depleted cells was rescued by the addition of purified Wnt5a but not that of Wnt3a, which is a ligand for the β-catenin-dependent pathway. Moreover, depletion of Wnt5a signaling caused loss of stabilized microtubules and mislocalization of CHMP4B in the midbody, which affected abscission. Inhibition of the stabilization of microtubules at the midbody lead to the mislocalization of CHMP4B, while depletion of CHMP4B did not affect the stabilization of microtubules, suggesting that the correct localization of CHMP4B depends on microtubules. Fz2 was localized to the midbody in a Rab11-dependent manner probably along stabilized microtubules. Fz2 formed a complex with CHMP4B upon Wnt5a stimulation and was required for proper localization of CHMP4B at the midbody, while CHMP4B was not necessary for the localization of Fz2. These results suggest that Wnt5a signaling positions ESCRT-III in the midbody properly for abscission by stabilizing midbody microtubules.
    Journal of Cell Science 07/2012; 125(20). DOI:10.1242/jcs.108142 · 5.33 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Aberrant regulation of the Wnt signaling pathway is a prevalent theme in cancer biology. From the earliest observation that Wnt overexpression could lead to malignant transformation of mouse mammary tissue to the most recent genetic discoveries gleaned from tumor genome sequencing, the Wnt pathway continues to evolve as a central mechanism in cancer biology. This article summarizes the evidence supporting a role for Wnt signaling in human cancer. This includes a review of the genetic mutations affecting Wnt pathway components, as well as some of epigenetic mechanisms that alter expression of genes relevant to Wnt. I also highlight some research on the cooperativity of Wnt with other signaling pathways in cancer. Finally, some emphasis is placed on laboratory research that provides a proof of concept for the therapeutic inhibition of Wnt signaling in cancer.
    Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology 03/2012; 4(5). DOI:10.1101/cshperspect.a008052 · 8.23 Impact Factor


Available from