Guidelines for recording/analyzing quantitative EEG and evoked potentials: Part II. Clinical aspects

Departamento de Mapeamento Topográfico, Sociedade Brasileira de Neurofisiologia Clínica, São Paulo, Brasil.
Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria (Impact Factor: 0.84). 04/1999; 57(1):132-46.
Source: PubMed


Digital EEG (DEEG) and quantitative EEG (QEEG) are recently developed tools present in many clinical situations. Besides showing didactic and research utility, they may also have a clinical role. Although a considerable amount of scientific literature has been published related to QEEG, many controversies still subsist regarding its clinical utilization. Clinical applications are: 1. DEEG is already an established substitute for conventional EEG, representing a clear technical advance. 2. Certain QEEG techniques are an established addition to DEEG for: 2a) screening for epileptic spikes or seizures in long-term recordings; 2b) Operation room and intensive care unit EEG monitoring. 3. Certain QEEG techniques are considered possible useful additions to DEEG: 3a) topographic voltage and dipole analysis in epilepsy evaluations; 3b) frequency analysis in cerebrovascular disease and dementia, mostly when other tests have been inconclusive. 4. QEEG remains investigational for clinical use in postconcussion syndrome, learning disability, attention disorders, schizophrenia, depression, alcoholism and drug abuse. EEG brain mapping and other QEEG techniques should be clinically used only by physicians highly skilled in clinical EEG interpretation and as an adjunct to traditional EEG work.

Download full-text


Available from: Renato Anghinah, Feb 28, 2015
  • Source
    • "A Braintech 3.0 (EMSA " Equipamentos Médicos " ) was the recording hardware. Impedance was maintained below 10 K, and the electrodes were placed according to the International 10–20 System [5] [20]. The interconnected ear lobe electrodes reference (without resistor ) is standard in our laboratory, despite the fact that there are controversies regarding which reference is the best [21] [22]. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: There is not a specific Alzheimer's disease (AD) diagnostic test. AD diagnosis relies on clinical history, neuropsychological, and laboratory tests, neuroimaging and electroencephalography. Therefore, new approaches are necessary to enable earlier and more accurate diagnosis and to measure treatment results. Quantitative EEG (qEEG) can be used as a diagnostic tool in selected cases. The aim of this study was to answer if distinct electrode montages have different sensitivity when differentiating controls from AD patients. We analyzed EEG spectral peaks (delta, theta, alpha, beta, and gamma bands), and we compared references (Biauricular, Longitudinal bipolar, Crossed bipolar, Counterpart bipolar, and Cz reference). Support Vector Machines and Logistic Regression classifiers showed Counterpart bipolar montage as the most sensitive electrode combination. Our results suggest that Counterpart bipolar montage is the best choice to study EEG spectral peaks of controls versus AD.
    International Journal of Alzheimer's Disease 05/2011; 2011(3):761891. DOI:10.4061/2011/761891
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The most common electroencephalography (EEG) findings in moderate and advanced stages of dementia disease are the background frequency increase in δ- and Ѳ-activities and the decrease or dropout of α-activity. It was found, while studying patients with Alzheimer disease (AD) and vascular dementia (VD), that a decrease in α-activity is present in both the groups that agree with several other works done in the past decade. Spectral analyses have been considered very sensitive to EEG background changes and agree strongly with clinical AD suspects. The sensitivity of this method is 71%-81%. When spectral analyses are compared with neuropsychological tests, again, there is a strong correlation between both. Another tool for EEG activity analysis is the coherence analysis used to evaluate the level of covariance of spectral components between the pairs of electrodes sites. High coherence has been considered a structural and functional evidence of the connections between the pairs of brain cortical areas. In a study, using the same methodology, comparing a α1-band coherence between young healthy adult subjects under 50 and healthy group over 50, researchers did not find any significant difference between them. Future studies of quantitative analysis of EEG (qEEG) need to be accomplished to assess whether this method is clinically useful in predicting an AD diagnosis.
    Supplements to Clinical neurophysiology 12/2002; 54. DOI:10.1016/S1567-424X(09)70460-X
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: We studied the occipital inter-hemispheric coherence of Electroencephalogram (electrodes O1-O2) for alpha band (alpha1--8.0 to 10.0 Hz and alpha2--10.1 to 12.5 Hz) in two groups of healthy individuals (young adults and subjects older than 50 years-old), to assess if there is significant difference between this two age groups. No significant difference in alpha band coherences was found between these two age groups.
    Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria 04/2005; 63(1):83-6. · 0.84 Impact Factor
Show more