Quality of life: Expanding the scope of clinical significance

Department of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia 19104, USA.
Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology (Impact Factor: 4.85). 07/1999; 67(3):320-31. DOI: 10.1037/0022-006X.67.3.320
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Clinical researchers have turned their attention to quality of life assessment as a means of broadening the evaluation of treatment outcomes. This article examines conceptual and methodological issues related to the use of quality of life measures in mental health. These include the lack of a good operational definition of the construct, the use of subjective versus objective quality of life indicators, and the nature of the relationship between symptoms and quality of life judgments. Of special concern is the ability of quality of life measures to detect treatment-related changes. The authors review the application of quality of life assessment across diverse patient groups and therapies and provide recommendations for developing comprehensive, psychometrically sophisticated quality of life measures.


Available from: Paul Crits-Christoph, Jun 15, 2015
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The present investigation evaluated the relations among anxiety and depressive disorder comorbidity and quality of life (QOL) by utilizing self-report measures of life satisfaction and functional disability. Participants were 94 individuals who were presented for treatment at an outpatient anxiety disorders clinic and 26 nonclinical participants. Results indicated that participants diagnosed with anxiety disorders reported lower QOL than did nonclinical participants. Anxiety disorder comorbidity did not additionally impact QOL; however, presence of a depressive disorder comorbid with an anxiety disorder did negatively impact QOL as these individuals reported significantly more functional disability and less life satisfaction than did individuals with anxiety disorders alone or those without a psychiatric diagnosis. These results highlight the negative nature of anxiety disorders and improve clarification on the role of diagnostic comorbidity on QOL among those with an anxiety disorder.
    Journal of Anxiety Disorders 04/2008; 22(8):1516-22. DOI:10.1016/j.janxdis.2008.03.005 · 2.96 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Four million adults in the U.S. have co-occurring serious mental illness and a substance use disorder. Mutual aid can usefully complement treatment, but people with co-occurring disorders often encounter a lack of empathy and acceptance in traditional mutual aid groups. Double Trouble in Recovery (DTR) is a dual focus fellowship whose mission is to bring the benefits of mutual aid to persons with dual diagnoses. Three hundred and ten persons attending 24 DTR groups in New York City during 1998 were interviewed and followed-up for two years. A mediational model was specified and results across time were summarized with generalized estimating equations (GEE). Degree of DTR Affiliation (attendance and involvement) was significantly associated with Self-efficacy for Recovery and three quality of life measures: Leisure Time Activities, Feelings of Well-Being and Social Relationships. Self-efficacy fully mediated the effects of DTR Affiliation on Leisure Time and Feelings and partially mediated DTR's effect on Social Relationships. The association of DTR involvement with self-efficacy is consistent with the processes inherent in mutual aid, although the observational nature of these data preclude causal inference. To improve outcomes, clinicians should facilitate affiliation with dual focus groups among persons with dual diagnoses as part of a comprehensive treatment approach.
    Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research 02/2007; 34(1):1-12. DOI:10.1007/s10488-006-0091-x · 3.44 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This study examines the relationship between personality and quality of life (QOL) in psychiatric outpatients (N=495). Personality was conceptualized using two-dimensional models, respectively, the five-factor model (FFM) and Cloninger's seven-factor model. The WHOQOL-100 was used for assessing QOL. Neuroticism and Harm Avoidance had negative correlations with QOL, whereas Extraversion, Conscientiousness and Self-Directedness correlated positively with QOL. A considerable part of the QOL variance was explained by personality; Cloninger's character factors were superior to the FFM domains. Although not fully comparable, in general our findings are in accordance with earlier studies. Therefore, paying attention to personality and temperament is recommended in future diagnostic procedures, treatment policies, and program evaluations.
    Psychiatry Research 02/2007; 149(1-3):81-8. DOI:10.1016/j.psychres.2006.01.004 · 2.68 Impact Factor