Pain perception: is there a role for primary somatosensory cortex? Proc Natl Acad Sci USA

McGill University and Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada H3A 1A1.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (Impact Factor: 9.67). 08/1999; 96(14):7705-9. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.96.14.7705
Source: PubMed


Anatomical, physiological, and lesion data implicate multiple cortical regions in the complex experience of pain. These regions include primary and secondary somatosensory cortices, anterior cingulate cortex, insular cortex, and regions of the frontal cortex. Nevertheless, the role of different cortical areas in pain processing is controversial, particularly that of primary somatosensory cortex (S1). Human brain-imaging studies do not consistently reveal pain-related activation of S1, and older studies of cortical lesions and cortical stimulation in humans did not uncover a clear role of S1 in the pain experience. Whereas studies from a number of laboratories show that S1 is activated during the presentation of noxious stimuli as well as in association with some pathological pain states, others do not report such activation. Several factors may contribute to the different results among studies. First, we have evidence demonstrating that S1 activation is highly modulated by cognitive factors that alter pain perception, including attention and previous experience. Second, the precise somatotopic organization of S1 may lead to small focal activations, which are degraded by sulcal anatomical variability when averaging data across subjects. Third, the probable mixed excitatory and inhibitory effects of nociceptive input to S1 could be disparately represented in different experimental paradigms. Finally, statistical considerations are important in interpreting negative findings in S1. We conclude that, when these factors are taken into account, the bulk of the evidence now strongly supports a prominent and highly modulated role for S1 cortex in the sensory aspects of pain, including localization and discrimination of pain intensity.

Download full-text


Available from: Jen-I Chen, Oct 23, 2014
    • "The complex effects of cannabinoids on information processing, shared among various functional entities throughout the brain, suggest that cannabinoids may modulate pain perception by disturbing the connectivity within the human pain matrix (Apkarian et al, 2005; Bushnell et al, 1999; Price, 2000). As recently shown, THC reduces functional connectivity between the amygdala and the primary somatosensory cortex (S1) during pain processing , but it is not clear whether this effect results from reduced limbic output or reduced sensory input into the amygdala (Lee et al, 2013). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Cannabinoids receive increasing interest as analgesic treatments. However, the clinical use of Δ(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol (Δ(9)-THC) has progressed with justified caution which also owes to the incomplete mechanistic understanding of its analgesic effects, in particular its interference with the processing of sensory or affective components of pain. The present placebo-controlled cross-over study therefore focused on the effects of 20 mg oral THC on the connectivity between brain areas of the pain matrix following experimental stimulation of trigeminal nocisensors in 15 non-addicted healthy volunteers. A general linear model (GLM) analysis identified reduced activations in the hippocampus and the anterior insula following THC administration. However, assessment of psychophysiological interaction (PPI) revealed that the effects of THC firstly consisted in a weakening of the interaction between the thalamus and the secondary somatosensory cortex (S2). From there, dynamic causal modeling (DCM) was employed to infer that THC attenuated the connections to the hippocampus and to the anterior insula, suggesting that the reduced activations in these regions are secondary to a reduction of the connectivity from somatosensory regions by THC. These findings may have consequences for the way THC effects are currently interpreted: as cannabinoids are increasingly considered in pain treatment, present results provide relevant information about how THC interferes with the affective component of pain. Specifically, the present experiment suggests THC does not selectively affect limbic regions, but rather interferes with sensory processing which in turn reduces sensory-limbic connectivity, leading to deactivation of affective regions.Neuropsychopharmacology accepted article preview online, 30 October 2015. doi:10.1038/npp.2015.336.
    Neuropsychopharmacology: official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology 10/2015; DOI:10.1038/npp.2015.336 · 7.05 Impact Factor
    • "The reduction in activation of insular cortex was correlated with a significant reduction in subjects' perception of pain. The insular cortex and the anterior cingulate cortex are both engaged in pain processing and both participate in high-level control of autonomic function [40] [41]. Although these two areas are interconnected, they operate independently and analyse different components of pain sensation. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The autonomic nervous system and the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axis have been shown to be dysfunctional in a number of chronic pain disorders. Spinal manipulation is a therapeutic technique used by manual therapists, which may have widespread neuro-physiological effects. The autonomic nervous system has been implicated to modulate these effects. A theory is proposed that spinal manipulation has the potential to be used as a tool in restoring the autonomic nervous system balance. Further, it is also hypothesised that through its anatomical and physiological connections, the autonomic nervous system activity following a thoracic spinal manipulation may have an effect on the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axis and therefore pain and healing via modulation of endocrine and physiological processes. To substantiate our hypothesis we provide evidence from manual therapy studies, basic science and animal studies. According to the proposed theory, there will be measurable changes in the neuro-endocrinal mechanisms following a thoracic spinal manipulation. This has far-reaching implications for manual therapy practice and research and in the integration of spinal manipulation in the treatment of a wide array of disorders.
    Medical Hypotheses 10/2015; 85(6):819-824. DOI:10.1016/j.mehy.2015.10.003 · 1.07 Impact Factor
    • "It can be argued that these differences reflect a mirroring mechanism in the primary somatosensory cortex, since mu suppression is linked to the activity of the primary somatosensory cortex (Ritter, Moosmann, & Villringer, 2009) and the primary sensory cortex is thought to be part of the human mirror neuron system (Avikainen, Forss, & Hari, 2002; Pineda, 2008). This is in accordance with results of studies showing that the activity of the primary sensory cortex in response to pain and mu suppression in response to neutral actions can be altered by higher cognitive processes (Bushnell et al., 1999; Hoenen et al., 2013; Lamm, Nusbaum, Meltzoff, & Decety, 2007) and hypnosis (Hofbauer et al., 2001). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In accordance with simulation theories of empathy, the somatosensory cortex is involved in the perception of pain of others. Cognitive processes, like perspective taking, can alter empathy-related activity within the somatosensory cortex. The current study investigates whether this modulation is caused by the imagined sensation of pain or by the cognitive load of a perspective-taking task. Applying a within-subject design, participants (N = 30) watched pictures of painful and nonpainful actions, while imagining reduced, normal, or increased pain perception of the observed individual. Mu activity (8–13 Hz), which is inversely correlated with sensorimotor-cortex activity, was measured via EEG. To calculate mu activity (central electrodes) and alpha activity (occipital electrodes), which served as a control for effects of cognitive load, a fast Fourier transform was applied. Mu suppression linearly increased from reduced to normal to increased imagined pain (p < .05), while alpha activity was unaffected by the imagined pain (p > .80). Suppression of the 8–13 Hz band at central and occipital electrodes was stronger in response to painful actions compared to nonpainful actions (p < .01). These results indicate that modulation of mu activity through perspective taking reflects the imagined pain intensity and not the cognitive load induced by the task.
    Psychophysiology 09/2015; Advance online publication. DOI:10.1111/psyp.12522 · 2.99 Impact Factor
Show more