Article

PCR and blood culture of Escherichia coli bacteremia in rats

Klinik für Anästhesiologie, Hygiene Institute, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Journal of Clinical Microbiology (Impact Factor: 4.23). 08/1999; 37(8):2479-82.
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Critically ill patients often develop symptoms of sepsis and therefore require microbiological tests for bacteremia that use conventional blood culture (BC) techniques. However, since these patients frequently receive early empirical antibiotic therapy before diagnostic procedures are completed, examination by BC can return false-negative results. We therefore hypothesized that PCR could improve the rate of detection of microbial pathogens over that of BC. To test this hypothesis, male Wistar rats were challenged intravenously with 10(6) CFU of Escherichia coli. Blood was then taken at several time points for detection of E. coli by BC and by PCR with E. coli-specific primers derived from the uidA gene, encoding beta-glucuronidase. In further experiments, cefotaxime (100 or 50 mg/kg of body weight) was administered intravenously to rats 10 min after E. coli challenge. Without this chemotherapy, the E. coli detection rate decreased at 15 min and at 210 min after challenge from 100% to 62% of the animals with PCR and from 100% to 54% of the animals with BC (P, >0.05). Chemotherapy decreased the E. coli detection rate at 25 min and at 55 min after challenge from 100% to 50% with PCR and from 100% to 0% with BC (P, <0.05). Thus, at clinically relevant serum antibiotic levels, PCR affords a significantly higher detection rate than BC in this rat model. The results suggest that PCR could be a useful adjunct tool supplementing conventional BC techniques in diagnosing bacteremia.

0 Followers
 · 
77 Views
  • Source
    • "Once diluted, one loop was cultured on MacConkey agar (direct plating) at 37 8C for 18–20 h. One compatible colony per plate was selected and confirmed by PCR (Heininger et al., 1999). This confirmed colony of indicator E. coli (i.e. one clon per animal) was tested for antimicrobial susceptibility. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Wildlife is increasingly abundant in urban environments, but little is known about the zoonotic pathogens carried by these populations. Urban wild boars are of particular concern because this species is well-known as a pathogen reservoir, and thus, we studied selected zoonotic pathogens in urban wild boars in Barcelona, Spain (n=41). Salmonella enterica was found in 5.00% (95% CI 0.61-16.91) and Campylobacter coli in 4.88% (95% CI 0.6-16.53) of the animals. E. coli O157:H7 and C. jejuni were not found. Other thermophilic Campylobacter were moderately prevalent (19.51%, 95% CI 8.82-34.87). Additionally, we screened for antimicrobial resistance in indicator bacteria: resistance was most frequent in Enterococcus faecium (95% of the isolates were resistant to at least one antimicrobial agent), followed by Enterococcus faecalis (50%) and Escherichia coli (10%). For the first time resistance to linezolid in bacteria carried by wildlife is reported. These findings pose a concern for public health, and thus, further research is needed on wildlife in urban environments.
    Veterinary Microbiology 08/2013; 167(3-4). DOI:10.1016/j.vetmic.2013.07.037 · 2.73 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "Hackett even showed a concentration peak in severe cases of septicaemia to a maximum of 1.8 × 10 9 bacteria per mL [24] [25] [26]. Heininger et al. (1999) demonstrated the advantage of PCR detection of preceding antibiotic treatment in a rat model. Whereas the detection rate of classical blood cultures falls to 10 % within 25 min after intravenous administration of cefotaxime, the PCR detection rate is still 100% at that time [27]. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Pathogen identification in clinical routine is based on the cultivation of microbes with subsequent morphological and physiological characterisation lasting at least 24 hours. However, early and accurate identification is a crucial requisite for fast and optimally targeted antimicrobial treatment. Molecular biology based techniques allow fast identification, however discrimination of very closely related species remains still difficult. A molecular approach is presented for the rapid identification of pathogens combining PCR amplification with microarray detection. The DNA chip comprises oligonucleotide capture probes for 25 different pathogens including Gram positive cocci, the most frequently encountered genera of Enterobacteriaceae, non-fermenter and clinical relevant Candida species. The observed detection limits varied from 10 cells (e.g. E. coli) to 10(5) cells (S. aureus) per mL artificially spiked blood. Thus the current low sensitivity for some species still represents a barrier for clinical application. Successful discrimination of closely related species was achieved by a signal pattern recognition approach based on the k-nearest-neighbour method. A prototype software providing this statistical evaluation was developed, allowing correct identification in 100 % of the cases at the genus and in 96.7 % at the species level (n = 241). The newly developed molecular assay can be carried out within 6 hours in a research laboratory from pathogen isolation to species identification. From our results we conclude that DNA microarrays can be a useful tool for rapid identification of closely related pathogens particularly when the protocols are adapted to the special clinical scenarios.
    BMC Microbiology 02/2007; 7:78. DOI:10.1186/1471-2180-7-78 · 2.98 Impact Factor
  • Source
Show more

Preview

Download
0 Downloads
Available from