Cheng KH, Leung SL, Hoekman HW, et al. Incidence of contact-lens-associated microbial keratitis and its related morbidity
Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam, Rotterdam, South Holland, Netherlands The Lancet
(Impact Factor: 45.22).
07/1999; 354(9174):181-5. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(98)09385-4
The incidence of contact-lens-associated microbial keratitis is uncertain and its related morbidity in the general population of contact-lens wearers is not known. We examined these issues in a prospective epidemiological study.
We surveyed all practising ophthalmologists in the Netherlands to identify all new cases of microbial keratitis reported during a 3-month period in 1996. Follow-up telephone calls were made to examine ocular morbidity. We undertook annual nationwide telephone surveys between 1994 and 1997 to estimate the prevalence of contact-lens wear.
Of 440 ophthalmologists contacted, 379 provided information. There were 92 cases of microbial keratitis; 17 used daily-wear rigid gas-permeable lenses, 63 daily-wear soft lenses, and 12 extended-wear soft lenses. The estimated annualised incidence of microbial keratitis was 1.1 per 10,000 (95% CI 0.6-1.7) users of daily-wear rigid gas-permeable lenses, 3.5 per 10,000 (2.7-4.5) users of daily-wear soft lenses, and 20.0 per 10,000 (10.3-35.0) users of extended-wear soft lenses (p<0.00001 for comparison between all groups), Five of the 92 patients achieved a final visual acuity of 20/70 or less. Pseudomonas and Serratia spp were the organisms most commonly isolated. Pseudomonas keratitis accounted for the largest mean diameter of corneal ulcers, the highest mean number of days in hospital, the greatest number of mean outpatients visits, and the poorest visual acuity outcome.
The incidence of microbial keratitis among users of extended-wear soft contact lenses in the Netherlands is similar to that reported in the USA during 1989. Awareness of risk factors and improvement in contact-lens materials have not led to a decrease in incidence. Overnight wear should be strongly discouraged.
Data provided are for informational purposes only. Although carefully collected, accuracy cannot be guaranteed. The impact factor represents a rough estimation of the journal's impact factor and does not reflect the actual current impact factor. Publisher conditions are provided by RoMEO. Differing provisions from the publisher's actual policy or licence agreement may be applicable.