Insulin, androgens, and obesity in women with and without polycystic ovary syndrome: a heterogeneous group of disorders.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Miguel Hernández University, Alicante, Spain.
Fertility and Sterility (Impact Factor: 4.17). 08/1999; 72(1):32-40. DOI:10.1016/S0015-0282(99)00184-3
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT To analyze the correlations among insulin, androgens, body mass index (BMI), and other related metabolic anomalies in women with and without polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS).
Retrospective study of normal and obese women with and without PCOS.
Gynecologic endocrinology units of Elche, San Juan, and Alicante Hospitals and Hormone Laboratory at Alicante University Hospital ("Miguel Hernández" University).
A total of 212 women were studied: 137 with PCOS and 75 without PCOS.
BMI, gonadotropins, insulin, androgens (T, androstenedione, DHEAS), 17alpha-hydroxyprogesterone, sex hormone-binding globulin, and triglycerides were studied. Glycemia and insulin response to the tolerance test (GTT) with a 100-g oral glucose load were also assessed in 103 women.
A good correlation between insulin and BMI was found in normal and obese women without hormonal dysfunction and in patients with or without PCOS. Good correlations, although lower, between insulin and T, and BMI, insulin, and T with triglycerides were also found in patients with PCOS. These patients fell into clearly distinct categories: with or without insulin resistance and with or without obesity, but slim women with PCOS had insulin and metabolic variables similar to those without PCOS, and most obese women with PCOS were insulin-resistant and more hyperandrogenic and hypertriglyceridemic.
Insulin, androgens, and BMI are related in women both with PCOS and without PCOS, especially in obese ones. Insulin and metabolic indices are similar in lean women with PCOS and those without PCOS, but obese women with PCOS are more insulin-resistant, hyperandrogenic, and hypertriglyceridemic. Three types of disorders can be distinguished: simple nonhyperandrogenic obesity, typical nonhyperinsulinemic PCOS, and insulin-resistant PCOS.

0 0
  • [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The purpose of this study was to assess the predictive values of central obesity and hyperandrogenemia in development of insulin resistance and dyslipidemia in the polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) patients in our region. Differences of fasting blood glucose level, insulin resistance index HOMA-IR, lipid parameters, waist hip ratio (WHR), body mass index, LH/FSH ratio and testosterone levels between 45 PCOS cases and 35 age matched controls were obtained. Strength of association between different parameters in the case group was assayed by Pearson’s correlation analysis. Dependence of insulin resistance and WHR on different predictors was assessed by multiple linear regression assay. Total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, LH, FSH, LH/FSH ratio, WHR and insulin resistance were significantly higher in the case group (p < 0.05). Serum testosterone showed strong correlation with insulin resistance and LH/FSH ratio (r = 0.432 and 0.747, p = 0.01 and 0.001 respectively) in the PCOS patients while WHR and serum testosterone level stood out to be most significant predictors for the insulin resistance (β = 0.361 and 0.498; p = 0.048 and 0.049 respectively). Hyperandrogenemia and central obesity were the major factors predicting development of insulin resistance and its related metabolic and cardiovascular complications in our PCOS patients. We suggest early monitoring for androgen level and WHR in these patients for predicting an ensuing insulin resistance and modulating the treatment procedure accordingly to minimise future cardiovascular risks.
    Indian Journal of Clinical Biochemistry 04/2013; 28(2).
  • Source
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Aim. To compare the retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness between women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) and healthy women. Materials and Methods. The study included 88 eyes of 44 women (group 1) with PCOS and 84 eyes of 42 healthy women (group 2). In all subjects, the RNFL and ganglion cell complex (GCC) thicknesses were measured by optical coherence tomography (OCT). In addition, visual acuity (VA), intraocular pressure (IOP), refractive errors, central macular thickness (CMT), central corneal thickness (CCT), and excavation of optic disc were evaluated in all subjects. Results. Mean values of GCC, IOP, VA, CMT, CCT, and refractive errors were similar between the 2 groups. The average RNFL, superior average RNFL, and inferior average RNFL thicknesses were higher in subjects with PCOS than in healthy subjects (P = 0.003, P = 0.012, and P = 0.009), respectively. Conclusion. The average RNFL, superior average RNFL, and inferior average RNFL thicknesses in women with PCOS were significantly higher than in healthy women.
    Journal of Ophthalmology 01/2013; 2013:752186. · 1.37 Impact Factor
  • [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: According to some studies, polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) patients have an increased risk for diabetes mellitus and often show an adverse cardiovascular risk profile. NT-proBNP was shown to have a high predictive value regarding cardiovascular events, especially in those without overt cardiovascular disease. The aim of this study was to investigate the levels of NT-proBNP in 70 women with PCOS and/or obesity in relation to other classical cardiovascular risk factors. There was no statistical difference between NT-proBNP levels between obese, lean PCOS and obese PCOS patients; between patients with or without metabolic syndrome; or between patients with different cardiovascular risk, according to The Androgen Excess and PCOS Society consensus. NT-proBNP does not show significant correlation to age, weight, BMI, WHR, WSR, systolic or diastolic blood pressure and results from oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT), except for immunoreactive insulin (IRI) at 120 min. NT-proBNP correlates weakly with HDL, but not with other indices of lipid metabolism.
    Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology: the journal of the Institute of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 11/2013; 33(8):868-72. · 0.43 Impact Factor