Cross-cultural applicability in international classifications and research on alcohol dependence.
ABSTRACT Underlying cultural differences in the meaning of alcohol problems and dependence symptoms can lead people from different societies to systematically vary in their responses to a diagnostic interview, in ways that may be difficult for researchers to quantify or control. We identify four different ways that cultures can vary in their accounts of dependence symptoms, potentially leading to problems with the cross-cultural applicability of diagnostic criteria: (1) in terms of thresholds of symptom severity, or the point at which respondents from different societies recognize a symptom of dependence as something serious; (2) in the problematization of drinking-related states, or whether the symptoms described in official nomenclature on addiction even count as alcohol problems in all cultures; (3) in causal assumptions about how alcohol-related problems arise; and (4) in the extent to which there exist culture-specific manifestations of symptoms not adequately captured by official disease nomenclature.
Comparable data on the meaning of alcohol dependence criteria were collected from key informants in nine sites worldwide under the auspices of the WHO/NIH Cross-Cultural Applicability Research Project. Qualitative analysis compares and contrasts descriptions of ICD-10 dependence criteria across sites along the above four dimensions of cultural variation.
While descriptions of dependence symptoms were quite similar among key informants from sites that share norms around drinking and drunkenness, they varied significantly in comparisons between sites with markedly different drinking cultures. Contrary to expectation, descriptions of physical dependence criteria appeared to vary across sites as much as the more subjective symptoms of psychological dependence.
Problems with the cultural applicability of international nomenclature warrant careful consideration in future comparative research on addiction, although comparisons of dependence made across some cultural boundaries are likely to be much more problematic than comparisons made across others. Findings on dependence should be interpreted in light of what is known about the drinking cultures and norms of the societies involved. Future nosologies and diagnostic interview schedules should take into account a broad base of cultural experiences in conceptualizing alcohol dependence, in developing criteria and operationalizations and in determining the diagnostic significance of these.
SourceAvailable from: libdoc.who.int
[Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Observed differences in substance use are frequently attributed to cultural norms, which in turn are often interpreted as fixed properties of ethnically defined groups. During a community-based participatory research study (2009-2011), U.S. Cambodian women identified community-specific drinking behaviors and beliefs. To test how widely other U.S. Cambodians shared their views, we formulated them into a series of normative statements and surveyed local community members (N = 172). We identified few consensualized norms, which suggests that (A) norms may not be reducible to normative statements; and/or (B) norms may not be shared by all group members; and (C) if neither A nor B holds, then the attribution of observed drinking patterns to cultural norms lacks internal validity. Study's limitations were noted.Substance Use & Misuse 07/2014; 49(8):999-1006. DOI:10.3109/10826084.2013.855233 · 1.23 Impact Factor
[Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: The present study examined the relationship of schizophrenia-related cognitive deficits and comorbid alcohol use disorders (AUD) among inpatients with psychotic disorders. Relevant research has implicated the role of cognitive impairment in the development of AUD in general population and other psychiatric samples, and preliminary evidence lends credibility to associations between the positive (hallucinations, delusions) and negative (flat affect, lack of motivation) symptoms of schizophrenia and variations in cognitive deficits. Accordingly, it was hypothesized that any increased likelihood of AUD as a function of positive and negative symptomatology would be better accounted for by systematic variations in cognitive functions as they generally relate to the development of AUD. To test this association, a Principal Components Analysis was applied to the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS; Kay, Fiszbein, & Opler, 1987) using data collected from a large sample of inpatients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder. The resultant five component solution included the key Positive (POS), Negative (NEG) and Cognitive (COG) components needed to test the predicted mediation by COG on the relationship between AUD and POS/NEG. Next, interview and archival data pertaining to AUD were collected from 132 (23 female) randomly selected inpatient volunteers, with chart-ratings of AUD serving as the dependent measure in a planned logistic regression analysis. Although support for the primary prediction was not obtained, intriguing post-hoc analyses revealed a significant POS by COG interaction [Chi-Square(1) = 5.94, p