Authors' reply

Erasmus University, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Neurourology and Urodynamics (Impact Factor: 2.87). 02/1999; 18(5):472-5.
Source: PubMed
1 Read
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In a previous study an external condom catheter was used to measure noninvasively bladder pressure during interruption of the flow rate. The pressure increase in the condom sometimes caused a sphincter contraction that made bladder pressure measurement unreliable. Therefore, we developed a new variable outflow resistance catheter to measure noninvasively bladder pressure without interrupting the flow rate. The new catheter consists of an incontinence condom connected to a set of various outflow tubes and a pressure transducer. A remotely controlled pneumatic valve was fitted over each tube to interrupt flow through it. We measured isovolumetric pressure, maximum flow rate, and pressure and flow rates at various outflow resistances in 9 healthy male volunteers. We derived a mathematical equation to estimate isovolumetric pressure from the pressure and flow rate values measured at various outflow resistances. The difference in the estimated and truly measured mean isovolumetric pressures plus or minus standard deviation was 0 +/- 6 cm. water. The new variable outflow resistance catheter may be used to measure isovolumetric bladder pressure noninvasively without interrupting the flow rate. It has been previously shown that a combination of this pressure and a separately measured maximum flow rate may be used to diagnose bladder outlet obstruction noninvasively.
    The Journal of Urology 03/2001; 165(2):647-52. DOI:10.1097/00005392-200102000-00088 · 4.47 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To diagnose bladder outlet obstruction in male patients with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS), it is necessary to measure the bladder pressure via a transurethral (or suprapubic) catheter. This procedure incurs some risk of urinary tract infection and urethral trauma and is sometimes painful to the patient. We developed an external condom catheter to measure non-invasively the bladder pressure and developed a strategy to classify bladder outlet obstruction (BOO) based on this measurement. Seventy-five patients with a wide range of urological diagnoses underwent a pressure-flow study followed by a non-invasive study. We tested five different strategies to classify the patients using the provisional International Continence Society (ICS) method for definition of obstruction as the gold standard. Leakage of the external catheter occurred in eight (40%) of the first 20 tested patients. In the remaining 55 patients, only five (9%) of the measurements failed because of leakage. Of the 75 patients, 56 were successfully tested non-invasively. According to the ICS nomogram, the PFS showed that 22 of these patients were non-obstructed, 12 patients were equivocal, and 22 patients were obstructed. Ten of these 56 patients strained, and we found that the relatively high abdominal pressures in these patients were not reflected in the externally measured bladder pressure. Of the remaining 46 patients, 12 of 13 non-obstructed patients and 30 of 33 combined equivocal and obstructed patients could be correctly classified. We developed a simple, non-invasive classification strategy to identify BOO in those male patients who did not strain during voiding.
    Neurourology and Urodynamics 02/2002; 21(2):117-25. DOI:10.1002/nau.10046 · 2.87 Impact Factor