HAART in HIV-infected patients: restoration of antigen-specific CD4 T-cell responses in vitro is correlated with CD4 memory T-cell reconstitution, whereas improvement in delayed type hypersensitivity is related to a decrease in viraemia

Kantonsspital St. Gallen, San Gallo, Saint Gallen, Switzerland
AIDS (Impact Factor: 6.56). 11/1999; 13(14):1857-62. DOI: 10.1097/00002030-199910010-00007
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT To analyse prospectively the effect of highly active antiretroviral treatment (HAART) on CD4 T-cell responses in vitro and in vivo in HIV-infected patients.
Prospective study with 49 protease inhibitor-naive adult patients. Data were collected at baseline and after 3 and 6 months of HAART.
In vitro CD4 T-cell reactivity was analysed by stimulation of peripheral blood mononuclear cells with several antigens. In vivo CD4 T-cell reactivity (delayed type hypersensitivity) was assessed by Multitest Merieux. Both measurements were correlated to CD4 (memory) T-cell count and HIV-1 viraemia.
Restoration of specific CD4 T-cell proliferation was observed in most patients. The in vitro T-cell response was restored more frequently against antigens to which the immune system is constantly exposed (Candida albicans, Mycobacterium tuberculosis, M. avium) as compared with a low-exposure antigen (tetanus toxoid). Overall, delayed type hypersensitivity detection rate increased under HAART. Multivariate analysis showed improvement of antigen-specific T-cell proliferation to be significantly associated with an increase in memory CD4 T-cells, whereas improvement of the delayed type hypersensitivity response was associated with a decrease in plasma HIV-1 RNA.
HAART for 6 months restored antigen-specific CD4 T-cell response to several antigens. In vitro immune reconstitution was closely correlated with an increase in memory CD4 cells. Restoration of delayed type hypersensitivity was associated with suppression of viraemia. It appears that in addition to expansion of memory CD4 cells, suppression of viraemia following HAART may allow an improved inflammatory reaction, thus providing even stronger immune reconstitution.

Download full-text


Available from: Werner J Pichler, Jul 01, 2015
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The use of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) has led to a substantial decrease in the frequency of opportunistic infections among HIV-infected individuals, along with a significant reduction in their mortality rate. However, a subgroup of HAART-treated patients will exhibit paradoxical deterioration in their clinical status, despite satisfactory control of viral replication and improvements in CD4 lymphocyte counts. This clinical deterioration, known as the immune restoration syndrome or immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome (IRIS), is a result of an exuberant inflammatory response towards previously diagnosed or incubating opportunistic pathogens, as well as responses towards other as yet undefined antigens. A variety of manifestations of IRIS have been described, most prominently including Mycobacterium avium complex lymphadenitis, paradoxical exacerbations of pulmonary and CNS Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection, paradoxical exacerbations of Cryptococcus neoformans meningitis and cytomegalovirus uveitis. Treatment for this disorder includes continuation of primary therapy against the offending pathogen in order to decrease the antigenic load, continuation of effective HAART, and judicious use of anti-inflammatory agents. Although the clinical manifestations of IRIS are sometimes dramatic, and result in substantial morbidity, the fact that these patients are capable of generating an inflammatory response allows many of them to ultimately discontinue secondary prophylaxis for the offending pathogen.
    AIDS reviews 5(2):67-79. · 4.02 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To assess the safety of discontinuing or withholding primary prophylaxis against disseminated Mycobacterium avium infection (MAC) in HIV infected patients on successful antiretroviral combination therapy. National prospective multicentre cohort study. HIV-infected patients were eligible for the analysis if: (i) they had a history of at least two CD4 cell counts < 50 x 10(6)/l; (ii) they had never had MAC; (iii) they had discontinued or never begun primary prophylaxis against MAC; (iv) they received antiretroviral therapy and demonstrated an increase in CD4 cell counts to > or = 100 x 10(6)/l that was sustained for at least 12 weeks. From this time point until last follow-up, incidence of disseminated MAC disease was measured, and 99% confidence intervals were calculated assuming a Poisson distribution of events. Two-hundred and fifty-three patients (22.5% female; median age, 37 years, 30% injecting drug users) were eligible for analysis. Sixty-six per cent were in Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) stage C, and 28% were in CDC stage B. Their median nadir CD4 cell count was 10 x 10(6)/l, the median duration of CD4 cell count < 50 x 10(6)/l was 12 months. During a total follow-up of 364.3 patient-years there was no case of disseminated MAC. The one-sided 99% confidence limit for incidence density of MAC was 1.3 per 100 person-years. Discontinuing or withholding primary prophylaxis against MAC is safe in patients who have a sustained increase in their CD4 cell count to > or = 100 x 10(6)/l.
    AIDS 07/2000; 14(10):1409-12. DOI:10.1097/00002030-200007070-00014 · 6.56 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Recent dramatic decreases in acquired immunodeficiency syndrome-related mortality are largely due to the introduction of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART). Although immune restoration due to suppression of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) replication is a critical determinant of these trends, the magnitude of immune restoration seen after treatment with HAART varies substantially among treated persons and is generally incomplete. Nonetheless, even partial immune restoration is sufficient to provide protection from most major opportunistic infections; these risks can be largely predicted by the number of circulating CD4 cells. Limited data suggest that treatment earlier during the course of HIV infection may result in greater preservation of immune function, though this has not been studied in great detail. Preliminary studies performed among persons with multidrug-resistant virus whose treatment regimens are failing suggest that there is likely a benefit to continuation of therapy that may be related to diminished pathogenicity of drug-resistant virus. As deaths related to opportunistic infections diminish, the spectrum of causes of mortality in HIV infection is changing. Except for Kaposi sarcoma, there is insufficient information to conclude that the risks of non-Hodgkin lymphoma and other malignancies are diminishing among persons with HIV infection. How much immune restoration will be enough to ensure long-term survival in persons with HIV infection remains an open question. JAMA. 2000;284:223-228
    JAMA The Journal of the American Medical Association 08/2000; 284(2):223-8. DOI:10.1001/jama.284.2.223 · 30.39 Impact Factor