Endoanal MR imaging of the anal sphincter in fecal incontinence.

Department of Radiology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Radiographics (Impact Factor: 2.79). 11/1999; 19 Spec No:S171-7. DOI: 10.1148/radiographics.19.suppl_1.g99oc02s171
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Fecal incontinence is a major medical and social problem. The most frequent cause is a pathologic condition of the anal sphincter. Endoanal magnetic resonance (MR) imaging allows detailed visualization of the normal anatomy and pathologic conditions of the anal sphincter. The hyperintense internal sphincter appears as a continuation of the smooth muscle of the rectum; the hypointense external sphincter surrounds the lower part of the internal sphincter. A sphincteric defect is seen as a discontinuity of the muscle ring. Scarring appears as a hypointense deformation of the normal pattern of the muscle layer. Two external sphincteric patterns may be misdiagnosed as defects: a posterior discontinuity (often seen in young male patients) and an anterior discontinuity (often seen in female patients). Atrophy of the external sphincter is easily detected on coronal MR images by comparing the thicknesses of all anal muscles. Endoanal MR imaging is superior to endoanal ultrasonography because of the multiplanar capability and higher inherent contrast resolution of the former. Use of endoanal MR imaging may lead to better selection of candidates for surgery and therefore better surgical results. Endoanal MR imaging is the most accurate technique for detection and characterization of sphincteric lesions and planning of optimal therapy.

1 Bookmark
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Preoperative evaluation was made of the diagnostic value of endoanal ultrasound (EAUS) and endovaginal magnetic resonance imaging (EVMRI) in diagnosing anal sphincter defects as the cause of anal incontinence. Nineteen female individuals with anal incontinence were examined clinically with EAUS and with EVMRI at 1.5 T using a prostatic coil. The findings were evaluated independently and compared with findings at surgery. In diagnosing external anal sphincter defects, EAUS and EVMRI showed almost similar agreement with surgical findings, 12 (63%) out of 19 vs 11 (58%), respectively. Internal anal sphincter defects were equally detected by EAUS and EVMRI as compared with surgical diagnosis. There was considerable variation between radiologists in diagnosing defects by EVMRI. EAUS and EVMRI are equal in diagnosing anal sphincter defects.
    European Radiology 09/2004; 14(8):1472-7. · 4.34 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This study aims to evaluate the diagnostic precision of endoanal magnetic resonance imaging in identifying anal sphincter injury and/or atrophy when compared with either endoanal ultrasound or surgical diagnosis. Quantitative meta-analysis was performed on nine studies, comparing endoanal MRI with endoanal ultrasound or surgical diagnosis in 157 patients. Sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic odds ratio were calculated for each study. Summary receiver operating characteristic curves (SROC) and subgroup analysis were undertaken. The overall sensitivity and specificity of endoanal MRI for external sphincter injury was 0.78 (95%CI: 0.66-0.84) and 0.66 (95%CI: 0.51-0.79), respectively. For internal sphincter injury detection, this was 0.63 (95%CI: 0.50-0.74) and 0.71 (95%CI: 0.60-0.81), respectively. For detection of atrophy, this was 0.86 (95%CI: 0.71-0.95) and 0.82 (95%CI: 0.65-0.93), respectively. The area under the SROC curve and diagnostic odds ratio were 0.84 (SE = 0.07) and 6.14 (95%CI: 2.17-17.4) for external sphincter injury, 0.79 (SE = 0.07) and 4.60 (95%CI: 1.75-12.15) for internal sphincter injury, and 0.92 (SE = 0.08) and 21.49 (95%CI: 2.87-160.64) for sphincter atrophy. Endoanal MRI was sensitive and specific for the detection of external sphincter injury and especially sphincter atrophy. It may be useful as an alternative to endoanal ultrasound in patients presenting with fecal incontinence, although further clinical studies are needed to identify its best application in clinical practice.
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease 07/2008; 23(6):641-51. · 2.24 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Faecal incontinence is a common multifactorial disorder. Major causes of faecal incontinence are related to vaginal delivery and prior anorectal surgery. In addition to medical history and physical examination, several anorectal functional tests and imaging techniques can be used to assess the underlying pathophysiology and to guide treatment planning in faecal incontinent patients. Anorectal functional tests provide functional information, but the potential strength comes from combining test results. Imaging techniques, including defecography, endoanal sonography, and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging, provide structural information about the anorectal region with a direct clinical impact. The major role of imaging techniques in faecal incontinence is visualising the structural and functional integrity of the anal sphincter complex. Both two-dimensional endoanal sonography and endoanal MR imaging are accurate tools to depict anal sphincter defects. The major advantage of endoanal MR imaging is the accurate demonstration of external anal sphincter atrophy. Recent studies have suggested that external phased array MR imaging and three-dimensional endoanal sonography are also valuable tools in the diagnostic work up of faecal incontinence. Decisions about the preferred technique will mainly be determined by availability and local expertise. This article demonstrates the current role of tests, predominantly imaging tests, in the diagnostic work up of faecal incontinence.
    European Radiology 09/2006; 16(8):1727-36. · 4.34 Impact Factor