Article

Characteristics of bone ingrowth and interface mechanics of a new porous tantalum biomaterial

Montreal General Hospital and McGill University, Québec, Canada.
The Bone & Joint Journal (Impact Factor: 2.8). 10/1999; 81(5):907-14. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.81B5.9283
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT We have studied the characteristics of bone ingrowth of a new porous tantalum biomaterial in a simple transcortical canine model using cylindrical implants 5 x 10 mm in size. The material was 75% to 80% porous by volume and had a repeating arrangement of slender interconnecting struts which formed a regular array of dodecahedron-shaped pores. We performed histological studies on two types of material, one with a smaller pore size averaging 430 microm at 4, 16 and 52 weeks and the other with a larger pore size averaging 650 microm at 2, 3, 4, 16 and 52 weeks. Mechanical push-out tests at 4 and 16 weeks were used to assess the shear strength of the bone-implant interface on implants of the smaller pore size. The extent of filling of the pores of the tantalum material with new bone increased from 13% at two weeks to between 42% and 53% at four weeks. By 16 and 52 weeks the average extent of bone ingrowth ranged from 63% to 80%. The tissue response to the small and large pore sizes was similar, with regions of contact between bone and implant increasing with time and with evidence of Haversian remodelling within the pores at later periods. Mechanical tests at four weeks indicated a minimum shear fixation strength of 18.5 MPa, substantially higher than has been obtained with other porous materials with less volumetric porosity. This porous tantalum biomaterial has desirable characteristics for bone ingrowth; further studies are warranted to ascertain its potential for clinical reconstructive orthopaedics.

0 Followers
 · 
170 Views
  • Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research 12/2015; 10(1). DOI:10.1186/s13018-015-0166-z · 1.58 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Severe metaphyseal and meta-diaphyseal bone loss poses important challenges in revision total knee arthroplasty. The best strategy for addressing massive tibial bone loss has not been determined. The purpose of this study was to assess the intermediate-term clinical and radiographic results of porous tibial cone implantation. Sixty-six porous tantalum tibial cones (sixty-three patients) were reviewed at a mean follow-up time of seventy months (range, sixty to 106 months). According to the Anderson Orthopaedic Research Institute bone defect classification, twenty-four knees had a Type-3 defect, twenty-five knees had a Type-2B defect, and seventeen knees had a Type-2A defect. The mean age at the time of the index revision was sixty-seven years (range, forty-one to eighty-three years), and 57% of patients were female. The mean American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status was 2.4 (range, 2 to 3), and the mean body mass index was 33 kg/m(2) (range, 25 to 53 kg/m(2)). Fifteen patients (24%) were on immunosuppressant medications, and eight patients (13%) were current smokers. The patients underwent a mean number of 3.4 prior knee surgical procedures (range, one to twenty procedures), and 49% of patients (thirty-one patients) had a history of periprosthetic infection. The mean Knee Society Scores improved significantly from 55 points preoperatively (range, 4 to 97 points) to 80 points (range, 28 to 100 points) at the time of the latest follow-up (p < 0.0001). One patient had progressive radiolucencies about the tibial stem and cone on radiographs. One patient had complete radiolucencies about the tibial cone, concerning for fibrous ingrowth. Three other cones were revised: one for infection, one for aseptic loosening, and one for periprosthetic fracture. Revision-free survival of the tibial cone component was >95% at the time of the latest follow-up. Porous tantalum tibial cones offer a promising management option for severe tibial bone loss. At the intermediate-term follow-up (five to nine years), porous tantalum tibial cones had durable clinical results and radiographic fixation. The biologic ingrowth of these implants offers the potential for successful long-term structural support in complex knee reconstruction. Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence. Copyright © 2015 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated.
    The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery 02/2015; 97(3):216-223. DOI:10.2106/JBJS.N.00540 · 4.31 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Porous tantalum has been reported to be a promising material for use in bone tissue engineering. In the present study, the biocompatibility and osteogenic properties of porous tantalum were studied in vitro and in vivo. The morphology of porous tantalum was observed using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Osteoblasts were cultured with porous tantalum, and cell morphology, adhesion and proliferation were investigated using optical microscopy and SEM. In addition, porous tantalum rods were implanted in rabbits, and osteogenesis was observed using laser scanning confocal microscopy and hard tissue slice examination. The osteoblasts were observed to proliferate over time and adhere to the tantalum surface and pore walls, exhibiting a variety of shapes and intercellular connections. The porous tantalum rod connected tightly with the host bone. At weeks 2 and 4 following implantation, new bone and small blood vessels were observed at the tantalum-host bone interface and pores. At week 10 after the porous tantalum implantation, new bone tissue was observed at the tantalum-host bone interface and pores. By week 12, the tantalum-host bone interface and pores were covered with new bone tissue and the bone trabeculae had matured and connected directly with the materials. Therefore, the results of the present study indicate that porous tantalum is non-toxic, biocompatible and a promising material for use in bone tissue engineering applications.
    Experimental and therapeutic medicine 03/2015; 9(3):780-786. DOI:10.3892/etm.2015.2208 · 0.94 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

Download
115 Downloads
Available from
May 22, 2014