Cross sectional survey of patients' satisfaction with information about cancer

Department of Public Health, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8RZ.
BMJ Clinical Research (Impact Factor: 14.09). 12/1999; 319(7219):1247-8. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.319.7219.1247
Source: PubMed
Download full-text


Available from: Ray B Jones, Jul 05, 2015
1 Follower
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: OBJECTIVE: This study aims to assess unfulfilled information needs of native-Dutch and Turkish-Dutch general practitioner (GP) patients in the Netherlands. In addition, the relation between perceived and recorded information provision by GPs is studied. METHODS: Unfulfilled information needs of native-Dutch (N=117) and Turkish-Dutch patients (N=74) were assessed through pre- and post-consultation questionnaires. Audiotapes of GP consultations were made to code GPs' information provision. RESULTS: Turkish-Dutch patients experience more unfulfilled information needs than native-Dutch patients, in particular those who identify equally with Dutch and Turkish culture. Overall, perceived information provision is hardly related to recorded information provision. CONCLUSION: GPs insufficiently provide Turkish-Dutch patients and, to a lesser extent, native-Dutch patients as well, the information they need. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: GPs should be trained in giving adequate, tailored information to patients with various ethnic and cultural backgrounds.
    Patient Education and Counseling 12/2012; 90(2). DOI:10.1016/j.pec.2012.11.013 · 2.60 Impact Factor
  • Source
    01/2009; 14(1):13-24. DOI:10.1177/1744987108099237
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The purpose of this study was to understand health information sources of individuals and families impacted by a cancer diagnosis. Overall, the findings support the Freimuth, Stein, and Kean (1989) model of health information acquisition. The cancer patients and family members who participated reported having significantly more health information along the continuum of cancer care, from causes to prevention, after a cancer diagnosis. Although a wide variety of interpersonal and mediated information sources are available, participants reported that the only consistently (88.1%) used source of information was doctors. The most important information sources were, in descending order, doctors, family members, nurses, friends, the Internet, other medical personnel, and other patients. Individuals, however, were most satisfied with family and friends as sources of information, followed by nurses, other patients, and doctors. Patients and family members rated the importance of and their satisfaction with various information sources differently. Patients rated nurses, other medical personnel, and support groups as more important than did family members, and patients were significantly more satisfied with doctors and nurses, whereas family members were significantly more satisfied with the Internet.
    Health Communication 02/2007; 21(2):143-51. DOI:10.1080/10410230701307162 · 0.97 Impact Factor