Article

Feminized Management and Backlash toward Agentic Women: The Hidden Costs to Women of a Kinder, Gentler Image of Middle Managers

Department of Psychology, Rutgers University, Piscataway, New Jersey 08854-8040, USA.
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (Impact Factor: 5.08). 12/1999; 77(5):1004-10. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.77.5.1004
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Women who display masculine, agentic traits are viewed as violating prescriptions of feminine niceness (L. A. Rudman, 1998). By legitimizing niceness as an employment criterion, "feminization" of management (requiring both agentic and communal traits for managers) may unintentionally promote discrimination against competent women. Participants made hiring recommendations for a feminized or masculine managerial job. Agentic female job applicants were viewed as less socially skilled than agentic males, but this perception only resulted in hiring discrimination for the feminized, not the masculine, job. Communal applicants (regardless of sex) invariably received low hiring ratings. Thus, women must present themselves as agentic to be hireable, but may therefore be seen as interpersonally deficient. Ironically, the feminization of management may legitimize discrimination against competent, agentic women.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Peter Glick, Aug 28, 2015
2 Followers
 · 
117 Views
  • Source
    • "Women's persisting lack of fit with high-status leadership positions (Eagly & Karau, 2002; Heilman, 2012; Koenig, Eagly, Mitchell, & Ristikari, 2011) is not equally reflected in all dimensions or stages in personnel selection procedures for high-status leadership positions: Research has revealed that in hiring-simulation paradigms where female and male applicants are described as well qualified for the job and therefore perceived as similarly competent, female applicants are evaluated less favourably for the positions than their male counterparts. For instance, studies by Glick, Zion, and Nelson (1988) as well as by Rudman and Glick (1999, 2001) showed that female applicants were perceived as less hireable for typically male positions than male applicants, even though evaluations of female and male applicants' competence were similar. Biernat and Fuegen (2001) asked participants to evaluate applicants and draw up a shortlist (i.e., to pre-select a number of applicants for the final hiring decision) as well as to make a hiring decision. "
  • Source
    • "measuring task-related competence and communion on scales from 1-6 (Rudman & Glick, 1999; 2001). The number of items was increased by adding nine items previously used to measure taskoriented leadership competence (e.g., competing, responsible, power striving) among further fillers measuring person-oriented leadership competence (e.g., modest, creative, fair, taken from Sczesny, 2003). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The traditional stereotype of the typical woman has been described as “nice, but incompetent.” However, such general gender stereotypes are applied to individual targets only under certain conditions: They are used to “fill in the blanks” (Heilman, 2012) if little personal information is provided about a target. “Typical lesbians” are regarded to have more typically masculine (agentic) characteristics such as task competence than the typical woman does. We thus hypothesized that if a woman displays behavior coinciding with the stereotype of the typical woman, it is more readily interpreted as stereotypically female if performed by a heterosexual woman than by a lesbian. Participants (N = 296) read a hypothetical job interview in which we manipulated the target’s sexual orientation (between subjects). Findings demonstrated that a lesbian was judged as more competent than a heterosexual woman in the presence of behavior that may be interpreted as gender-stereotypical (Experiments 1 and 2). This difference in competence judgments was not found in the absence of gender-stereotypical behavior (Experiment 1). Judging the heterosexual woman as low in masculinity was related to a judgment of lower competence (Experiment 2). Our findings demonstrate that there are conditions under which lesbians, a group often stereotyped negatively, are less susceptible to invoking negative female stereotypes than heterosexual women are.
    Archives of Sexual Behavior 06/2015; 44:1439-1447. DOI:10.1007/s10508-014-0412-1 · 3.53 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "Participants judged the candidate ' s warmth using four items : sincere , good natured , warm , and tolerant , ( a = . 92 ; e.g., Fiske et al., 2002 ; Rudman & Glick , 1999 ). Participants judged the candi - date ' s competence using five - items : competent , intelligent , confi - dent , competitive , and independent , ( a = . "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The incidence of obesity in the United States has tripled over the past fifty years, posing significant challenges for organizations. We build on stereotype content research and offer an overarching framework to understand individuals’ affective, cognitive, and behavioral responses to obesity. Across five studies, we demonstrate that individuals associate obesity with perceptions of low competence. Perceptions of low competence predict affective (disgust, sympathy) and behavioral (low help, high harm) responses to obesity. Consistent with the BIAS Map (Cuddy, Fiske, & Glick, 2007), these discriminatory responses are moderated by perceptions of warmth. We demonstrate that, in some cases, shifting perceptions of warmth is just as effective as losing weight for curtailing discrimination towards the obese. Our findings demonstrate that social categorization is labile and we offer prescriptive advice for individuals seeking to change the way others perceive them.
    Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 03/2015; 127. DOI:10.1016/j.obhdp.2015.01.002 · 3.13 Impact Factor
Show more