Comparing cycling world hour records, 1967-1996: modeling with empirical data.

Exercise Science Unit, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, USA.
Medicine &amp Science in Sports &amp Exercise (Impact Factor: 4.48). 12/1999; 31(11):1665-76. DOI: 10.1097/00005768-199911000-00025
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The world hour record in cycling has increased dramatically in recent years. The present study was designed to compare the performances of former/current record holders, after adjusting for differences in aerodynamic equipment and altitude. Additionally, we sought to determine the ideal elevation for future hour record attempts.
The first step was constructing a mathematical model to predict power requirements of track cycling. The model was based on empirical data from wind-tunnel tests, the relationship of body size to frontal surface area, and field power measurements using a crank dynamometer (SRM). The model agreed reasonably well with actual measurements of power output on elite cyclists. Subsequently, the effects of altitude on maximal aerobic power were estimated from published research studies of elite athletes. This information was combined with the power requirement equation to predict what each cyclist's power output would have been at sea level. This allowed us to estimate the distance that each rider could have covered using state-of-the-art equipment at sea level. According to these calculations, when racing under equivalent conditions, Rominger would be first, Boardman second, Merckx third, and Indurain fourth. In addition, about 60% of the increase in hour record distances since Bracke's record (1967) have come from advances in technology and 40% from physiological improvements.
To break the current world hour record, field measurements and the model indicate that a cyclist would have to deliver over 440 W for 1 h at sea level, or correspondingly less at altitude. The optimal elevation for future hour record attempts is predicted to be about 2500 m for acclimatized riders and 2000 m for unacclimatized riders.

  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The application of the scientific method in sport demands that regular and standardised testing must be implemented by the coach or scientist to determine whether the intervention, for instance training, has had the desired effect on sporting performance. However, the test administered by the coach or scientist must have been rigorously evaluated for acceptable validity and reliability. Moreover, the judgment as to the validity of a test must not be influenced by the popularisation of a test. Despite scientific evidence to the contrary, a popular incremental field test for endurance athletes (Conconi Test) has been uncritically accepted as valid by some coaches and sport scientists. The Conconi Test is assumed a non-invasive measure of the anaerobic threshold through the identification of a coincident deflection in heart rate. This paper briefly considers the methodology and biological explanation for the Cononic Test. The paper also elaborates on the historical context within which the popular Conconi Test was developed and how factors other than scientific evidence have led to the popularisation of this test amongst sport scientists and coaches. Users of this test should consider the possibility that at least some part of the accepted validity of the Conconi Test was due to appeals to authority (eminent scientists, prominent athletes, magnitude of the feat, medal counts, records), popularity and coincidental correlation (performance and test result).
    South African Journal for Research in Sports, Physical Education and Recreation. 01/2011; 33:23-35.
  • Source
    07/2011; , ISBN: 978-953-307-623-2
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: PURPOSE: To determine the effects of heat-acclimatization on performance and pacing during outdoor cycling time-trials (TT, 43.4km) in the heat. METHODS: Nine cyclists performed 3 TTs in hot ambient conditions (TTH, ∼37ºC) on the first (TTH-1), sixth (TTH-2) and fourteenth (TTH-3) days of training in the heat. Data were compared to the average of two TTs in cool condition (∼8ºC) performed pre and post heat acclimatization (TTC). RESULTS: TTH-1 (77±6min) was slower (p=0.001) than TTH-2 (69±5min) and both were slower (p<0.01) than TTC and TTH-3 (66±3 and 66±4 min, respectively) without differences between TTC and TTH-3 (p>0.05). The cyclists initiated the first 20% of all TTs at a similar power output, irrespective of climate and acclimatization status; however, during TTH-1 they subsequently had a marked decrease in power output, which was partly attenuated following six days of acclimatization and further reduced after fourteen days. HR was higher during the first 20% of TTH-1 than in the other TTs (p<0.05), but there were no differences between conditions from 30% onward. Final rectal temperature was similar in all TTHs (40.2±0.4ºC, p=1.000) and higher than in TTC (38.5±0.6ºC, p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Following two weeks of acclimatization, trained cyclists are capable of completing a prolonged TT in a similar time in the heat compared to cool conditions, whereas in the unacclimatized state they experienced a marked decrease in power output during the TTHs.
    Medicine and science in sports and exercise. 06/2014;


Available from
Jun 4, 2014