Cortical activity related to accuracy of letter recognition.

University of California at Davis, Davis, California 95616, USA.
NeuroImage (Impact Factor: 6.13). 03/2000; 11(2):111-23. DOI: 10.1006/nimg.1999.0528
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Previous imaging and neurophysiological studies have suggested that the posterior inferior temporal region participates in tasks requiring the recognition of objects, including faces, words, and letters; however, the relationship between accuracy of recognition and activity in that region has not been systematically investigated. In this study, positron emission tomography was used to estimate glucose metabolism in 60 normal adults performing a computer-generated letter-recognition task. Both a region of interest and a voxel-based method of analysis, with subject state and trait variables statistically controlled, found task accuracy to be: (1) negatively related to metabolism in the left ventrolateral inferior temporal occipital cortex (Brodmann's area 37, or ventrolateral BA 37) and (2) positively related to metabolism in a region of the right ventrolateral frontal cortex (Brodmann's areas 47 and 11, or right BA 47/11). Left ventrolateral BA 37 was significantly related both to hits and to false alarms, whereas the right BA 47/11 finding was related only to false alarms. The results were taken as supporting an automaticity mechanism for left ventrolateral BA 37, whereby task accuracy was associated with automatic letter recognition and in turn to reduced metabolism in this extrastriate area. The right BA 47/11 finding was interpreted as reflecting a separate component of task accuracy, associated with selectivity of attention broadly and with inhibition of erroneous responding in particular. The findings are interpreted as supporting the need for control of variance due to subject and task variables, not only in correlational but also in subtraction designs.

Download full-text


Available from: Amy S Garrett, Jul 07, 2015
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In an age of increasing technology, the possibility that typing on a keyboard will replace handwriting raises questions about the future usefulness of handwriting skills. Here we present evidence that brain activation during letter perception is influenced in different, important ways by previous handwriting of letters versus previous typing or tracing of those same letters. Preliterate, five-year old children printed, typed, or traced letters and shapes, then were shown images of these stimuli while undergoing functional MRI scanning. A previously documented ‘‘reading circuit’’ was recruited during letter perception only after handwriting—not after typing or tracing experience. These findings demonstrate that handwriting is important for the early recruitment in letter processing of brain regions known to underlie successful reading. Handwriting therefore may facilitate reading acquisition in young children.
    08/2012; 1(1):32-42. DOI:10.1016/j.tine.2012.08.001
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In models of letter recognition, handwritten letters are considered as a particular font exemplar, not qualitatively different in their processing from printed letters. Yet, some data suggest that recognizing handwritten letters might rely on distinct processes, possibly related to motor knowledge. We applied functional magnetic resonance imaging to compare the neural correlates of perceiving handwritten letters vs. standard printed letters. Statistical analysis circumscribed to frontal brain regions involved in hand-movement triggering and execution showed that processing of handwritten letters is supported by a stronger activation of the left primary motor cortex and the supplementary motor area. At the whole-brain level, additional differences between handwritten and printed letters were observed in the right superior frontal, middle occipital, and parahippocampal gyri, and in the left inferior precentral and the fusiform gyri. The results are suggested to indicate embodiment of the visual perception of handwritten letters.
    Human Brain Mapping 08/2011; 32(8):1250-9. DOI:10.1002/hbm.21105 · 6.92 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Two fMRI task contrasts identified BOLD activation differences between good and poor 11-year-old spellers. On the first contrast comparing judgments about letters in unfamiliar orthographic representations (pseudowords) no longer displayed versus displayed (at the time of judgement), good and poor spellers differed in left posterior cingulate and calcarine and bilateral precuneus; fMRI activation correlated with real-word reading rate in good spellers and with composition in poor spellers. On the second contrast comparing judgments about whether both items in a pair pronounced the same were both correctly spelled real words and whether both letter strings matched exactly, good spellers activated more than poor writers in the left precentral gyrus, postcentral gyrus, and inferior frontral gyrus, and right superior frontal gyrus, but poor writers activated more than good writers in left primary motor and superior and middle frontal, and word form, and right cuneus and middle frontal regions; fMRI activation in 7 regions correlated with spelling achievement. Results have implications for how both temporary orthographic representations of unfamiliar written words and long-term, precise representations of familiar, learned words contribute to middle-childhood spelling acquisition.
    Journal of Neurolinguistics 07/2009; DOI:10.1016/j.jneuroling.2008.11.002 · 1.60 Impact Factor