Effects of luminance and resolution on observer performance with chest radiographs.

Department of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15261-0001, USA.
Radiology (Impact Factor: 6.21). 04/2000; 215(1):169-74. DOI: 10.1148/radiology.215.1.r00ap34169
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT To examine the combined effects of image resolution and display luminance on observer performance for detection of abnormalities depicted on posteroanterior chest radiographs.
A total of 529 radiographs were displayed on a specially constructed view box at three luminance levels (770, 260, and 85 cd/m(2)) and three resolutions (100-microm, 200-microm, and 400-microm pixels). Each image was reviewed nine times by six radiologists who participated in this study. The abnormalities included nodule, pneumothorax, interstitial disease, alveolar infiltrates, and rib fracture. Negative (normal) radiographs were also included.
Receiver operating characteristic curves indicated that the effect of image luminance was greater than that of resolution. The detection of pneumothorax, interstitial disease, and rib fracture showed statistically significant differences (P <. 05) due to luminance. The detection of pneumothorax was the only abnormality with a statistically significant difference due to resolution. There was no evidence that luminance was related to image resolution for any of the abnormalities.
At a resolution of 400-microm pixels or higher across the field of view and a luminance of 260 cd/m(2) or more, primary diagnosis with posteroanterior chest radiographs is not likely to be affected by the quality of display.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Evaluation of diagnostic performance is typically based on the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and the area under the curve (AUC) as its summary index. The partial area under the curve (pAUC) is an alternative index focusing on the range of practical/clinical relevance. One of the problems preventing more frequent use of the pAUC is the perceived loss of efficiency in cases of noncrossing ROC curves. In this paper, we investigated statistical properties of comparisons of two correlated pAUCs. We demonstrated that outside of the classic model there are practically reasonable ROC types for which comparisons of noncrossing concave curves would be more powerful when based on a part of the curve rather than the entire curve. We argue that this phenomenon stems in part from the exclusion of noninformative parts of the ROC curves that resemble straight-lines. We conducted extensive simulation studies in families of binormal, straight-line, and bigamma ROC curves. We demonstrated that comparison of pAUCs is statistically more powerful than comparison of full AUCs when ROC curves are close to a “straight line”. For less flat binormal ROC curves an increase in the integration range often leads to a disproportional increase in pAUCs’ difference, thereby contributing to an increase in statistical power. Thus, efficiency of differences in pAUCs of noncrossing ROC curves depends on the shape of the curves, and for families of ROC curves that are nearly straight-line shaped, such as bigamma ROC curves, there are multiple practical scenarios in which comparisons of pAUCs are preferable.
    Biometrical Journal 12/2014; 57(2). DOI:10.1002/bimj.201400023 · 1.24 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To compare observer performance in the detection of anatomical structures and pathology in panoramic radiographs using a consumer grade display and tablet (3(rd) generation iPad; Cupertino, CA, USA) under suboptimal conditions compared to 6 MegaPixels (6 MP) display under dim lighting conditions.
    Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontology 07/2014; 118(1):135-141. DOI:10.1016/j.oooo.2014.04.005 · 1.46 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The area under the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) and related summary indices are widely used for assessment of accuracy of an individual and comparison of performances of several diagnostic systems in many areas including studies of human perception, decision making, and the regulatory approval process for new diagnostic technologies. Many investigators have suggested implementing the bootstrap approach to estimate variability of AUC-based indices. Corresponding bootstrap quantities are typically estimated by sampling a bootstrap distribution. Such a process, frequently termed Monte Carlo bootstrap, is often computationally burdensome and imposes an additional sampling error on the resulting estimates. In this article, we demonstrate that the exact or ideal (sampling error free) bootstrap variances of the nonparametric estimator of AUC can be computed directly, i.e., avoiding resampling of the original data, and we develop easy-to-use formulas to compute them. We derive the formulas for the variances of the AUC corresponding to a single given or random reader, and to the average over several given or randomly selected readers. The derived formulas provide an algorithm for computing the ideal bootstrap variances exactly and hence improve many bootstrap methods proposed earlier for analyzing AUCs by eliminating the sampling error and sometimes burdensome computations associated with a Monte Carlo (MC) approximation. In addition, the availability of closed-form solutions provides the potential for an analytical assessment of the properties of bootstrap variance estimators. Applications of the proposed method are shown on two experimentally ascertained datasets that illustrate settings commonly encountered in diagnostic imaging. In the context of the two examples we also demonstrate the magnitude of the effect of the sampling error of the MC estimators on the resulting inferences.
    Communication in Statistics- Theory and Methods 10/2007; 36(13):2443-2461. DOI:10.1080/03610920701215811 · 0.28 Impact Factor