Nefazodone Treatment of Major Depression in Alcohol-Dependent Patients: A Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington Seattle, Seattle, Washington, United States Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology
(Impact Factor: 3.24).
05/2000; 20(2):129-36. DOI: 10.1097/00004714-200004000-00003
Depression is the most common comorbid psychiatric illness in patients with alcohol dependence. This double-blind study tested the efficacy of nefazodone versus placebo for the treatment of depression in actively drinking alcohol-dependent patients who were also participating in weekly group treatment for alcoholism. Sixty-four subjects with major depression disorder and alcohol dependence with a history of at least one prior episode of depression when not drinking were randomly assigned to receive 12 weeks of either nefazodone or placebo and participated in a weekly psychoeducational group on alcoholism. Subjects were assessed every 2 weeks for depression, anxiety, side effects, and drinking frequency. Subjects taking nefazodone were significantly more likely to complete the study (62%) than those taking placebo (34%). Analyses of covariance using drinks per week as a time-dependent covariate showed lower Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression scores at week 8 for end-point analysis and at weeks 8 and 12 for completers. The endpoint analysis demonstrated a significantly greater response in the nefazodone group (48%) than in the placebo group (16%). Both groups showed a similarly significant decrease in the average number of alcoholic drinks consumed per day over the course of the study. Although the number of adverse effects was significantly greater for the nefazodone group, there were no severe adverse events, and nefazodone was well tolerated. Nefazodone is a safe and effective antidepressant to use in a population of alcohol-dependent patients with depression who have a high degree of comorbidity. Nefazodone treatment was superior to placebo in alleviating depression in these patients but did not add any advantage over the psychoeducational group in terms of drinking outcomes.
Available from: Vincent I.O Agyapong
- "The mean daily dose for this study was 460 mg/d. They found that depressive symptoms were reduced, but there were no reductions in drinking with nefazodone compared with placebo . Hernandez-Avila et al (2004) gave up to 600 mg/d of nefazodone to 41 primary depressed alcoholics for 10 weeks. "
[Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Among the numerous forms of comorbid mental health and substance use disorders, co-morbidity between
alcohol use disorders (AUD) and depression has received considerable attention. AUDs and depression co-occur at levels
greater than expected by chance in clinical and epidemiological samples. Studies suggest that about 80% of patients with
AUD experience depressive symptoms at some stage in their lives including 30% or more who describe significant
depression which lasts for weeks and which meets criteria for a major depressive episode. Several hypotheses have been
proposed to explain why the two disorders co-occur in individuals at higher than expected rates. There is also emerging
evidence to suggest that pharmacological treatment of depressive symptomatology as an adjunct to treatment for alcohol
dependence may be effective not only in treating depression but also in reducing alcohol consumption and alcohol related
harm. This review explores the literature on the epidemiology, etiology and management of depression and co-morbid
AUD. It also identifies the areas for further research.
Current Psychiatry Reviews 11/2013; 9(4):271-283. DOI:10.2174/15734005113096660005
Available from: Gul Kitapcioglu
- "A recent meta-analysis by Nunes and Levin (2004) found that antidepressants were effective for depressive symptoms among patients with alcohol dependence. Some authors reported a correlation between reduction in depressive symptoms and alcohol consumption during the antidepressant medication treatment (Cornelius et al., 1997; Mason et al., 1996; Moak et al., 2003), however some of them did not support this observation (Roy-Byrne et al., 2000). "
[Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Studies indicate that serotoninergic and noradrenergic pathophysiological mechanisms may underlie both alcohol abuse/dependence and depressive disorder. The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare the effectiveness and tolerability of two serotonergic and noradrenergic antidepressant drugs-mirtazapine and amitriptyline, for the treatment of patients with alcohol dependence co-morbid with depressive disorder in a randomized, double-blind treatment setting.
Forty-four patients were included in the study. Twenty-four patients were randomized to mirtazapine and twenty to amitriptyline groups. Thirty-six of them completed the study. The 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS), the Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) and alcohol craving questionnaire were used at baseline and, at days 7, 14, 28, 42, and 56 to estimate the effectiveness of the antidepressant treatment. Michigan Alcoholism Screening Test (MAST) was used in the assessment of alcohol dependence. The tolerability was assessed with the Udvalg for Kliniske Undersogelser Side Effect Rating Scale (UKU).
There was significant improvement in HDRS and alcohol craving scores with both the drugs. However there were no statistical differences between treatment groups. Mirtazapine was tolerated better than amitriptyline treatment.
The treatment with either mirtazapine or amitriptyline resulted with the reduction of HDRS and craving scores. The side-effect profile of mirtazapine was relatively favorable in our study.
Human Psychopharmacology Clinical and Experimental 06/2008; 23(4):313-9. DOI:10.1002/hup.935 · 2.19 Impact Factor
Available from: Ihsan Salloum
- "5-hydroxytryptamine-2 receptor, decreased depression but not drinking in outpatient subjects (Roy-Byrne et al., 2000). "
[Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: This article represents the proceedings of a symposium at the 2003 annual meeting RSA in Fort Lauderdale, FL. It was organized and cochaired by Charlene E. Le Fauve and Carrie L. Randall. The presentations were (1) Introduction, by Charlene E. Le Fauve and Raye Z. Litten; (2) Treatment of co-occurring alcohol use and anxiety disorders, by Carrie L. Randall and Sarah W. Book; (3) Pharmacological treatment of alcohol dependent patients with comorbid depression, by Darlene H. Moak; (4) Efficacy of valproate in bipolar alcoholics: a double blind, placebo-controlled study, by Ihsan M. Salloum, Jack R. Cornelius, Dennis C. Daley, Levent Kirisci, Johnathan Himmelhoch, and Michael E. Thase; (5) Alcoholism and schizophrenia: effects of antipsychotics, by Alan I. Green, Robert E. Drake, Suzannah V. Zimmet, Rael D. Strous, Melinda Salomon, and Mark Brenner; and (6) Conclusions, by Charlene E. Le Fauve; discussant, Raye Z. Litten. Alcohol-dependent individuals have exceptionally high rates of co-occurring psychiatric disorders. Although this population is more likely to seek alcoholism treatment than noncomorbid alcoholics, the prognosis for treatment is often poor, particularly among patients with more severe psychiatric illnesses. Development of effective interventions to treat this population is in the early stages of research. Although the interaction between the psychiatric condition and alcoholism is complex, progress has been made. The NIAAA has supported a number of state-of-the-art pharmacological and behavioral trials in a variety of comorbid psychiatric disorders. Some of these trials have been completed and are presented here. The symposium presented some new research findings from clinical studies with the aim of facilitating the development of treatments that improve alcohol and psychiatric outcomes among individuals with alcohol-use disorders and co-occurring psychiatric disorders. The panel focused on social anxiety disorder, depression, bipolar disorder, and schizophrenia.
Alcoholism Clinical and Experimental Research 03/2004; 28(2):302-12. DOI:10.1097/01.ALC.0000113413.37910.D7 · 3.21 Impact Factor
Data provided are for informational purposes only. Although carefully collected, accuracy cannot be guaranteed. The impact factor represents a rough estimation of the journal's impact factor and does not reflect the actual current impact factor. Publisher conditions are provided by RoMEO. Differing provisions from the publisher's actual policy or licence agreement may be applicable.