Article

Development of delirium: A prospective cohort study in a community hospital

University of Waterloo, Ватерлоо, Ontario, Canada
International Psychogeriatrics (Impact Factor: 1.89). 04/2000; 12(1):117-27. DOI: 10.1017/S1041610200006244
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Previous research on risk of delirium in acute hospital settings identified mainly patient variables (e.g., age) that are not amenable to intervention. The purpose of this study was to develop a model for new delirium in hospitalized older patients that included process of care and social variables.
A prospective cohort study was undertaken in a community hospital in Ontario, Canada. Research participants included 156 hospitalized patients age 65+ years and without delirium on admission who were admitted to a medical or surgical unit. The measures included daily appraisal of delirium using a standardized and validated tool, and assessment of patient, process of care, and social variables.
Delirium developed in 28 of the 156 patients (17.9%). Older age and cognitive impairment were significant patient variables. Significant process of care variables included a high number of medications administered during hospitalization, surgery, a high number of procedures during early hospitalization (e.g., x-rays, blood tests), and intensive care treatment.
Approximately one older patient in five developed delirium after admission to a medical or surgical unit. Risks not easily amenable to intervention included age, cognitive dysfunction, surgery, and intensive care requirements. Risk factors that are potentially modifiable included number of medications and number of procedures. Future research might focus on the efficacy of such intervention to reduce new-onset delirium in acute hospital settings.

2 Followers
 · 
89 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Introduction: Polypharmacy, defined as the use of multiple drugs or more than are medically necessary, is a growing concern for older adults. MEDLINE and EMBASE databases were searched from January 1, 1986 to June 30, 2013) to identify relevant articles in people aged > 65 years. Areas covered: We present information about: i) prevalence of polypharmacy and unnecessary medication use; ii) negative consequences of polypharmacy; and iii) interventions to improve polypharmacy. Expert opinion: International research shows that polypharmacy is common in older adults with the highest number of drugs taken by those residing in nursing homes. Nearly 50% of older adults take one or more medications that are not medically necessary. Research has clearly established a strong relationship between polypharmacy and negative clinical consequences. Moreover, well-designed interprofessional (often including clinical pharmacist) intervention studies that focus on enrolling high-risk older patients with polypharmacy have shown that they can be effective in reducing aspects of unnecessary prescribing with mixed results on distal health outcomes.
    Expert Opinion on Drug Safety 09/2013; DOI:10.1517/14740338.2013.827660 · 2.74 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Geriatricians have embraced the term “geriatric syndrome,” using it extensively to highlight the unique features of common health conditions in older people. Geriatric syndromes, such as delirium, falls, incontinence, and frailty, are highly prevalent, multifactorial, and associated with substantial morbidity and poor outcomes. Nevertheless, this central geriatric concept has remained poorly defined. This article reviews criteria for defining geriatric syndromes and proposes a balanced approach of developing preliminary criteria based on peer-reviewed evidence. Based on a review of the literature, four shared risk factors—older age, baseline cognitive impairment, baseline functional impairment, and impaired mobility—were identified across five common geriatric syndromes (pressure ulcers, incontinence, falls, functional decline, and delirium). Understanding basic mechanisms involved in geriatric syndromes will be critical to advancing research and developing targeted therapeutic options, although given the complexity of these multifactorial conditions, attempts to define relevant mechanisms will need to incorporate more-complex models, including a focus on synergistic interactions between different risk factors. Finally, major barriers have been identified in translating research advances, such as preventive strategies of proven effectiveness for delirium and falls, into clinical practice and policy initiatives. National strategic initiatives are required to overcome barriers and to achieve clinical, research, and policy advances that will improve quality of life for older persons.
    Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 05/2007; 55(5). DOI:10.1111/j.1532-5415.2007.01156.x · 4.22 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background Systematically targeting modifiable risk factors for delirium may reduce its incidence. However, research interventions have not become part of routine clinical practice. Particular approaches to the education of clinical staff may improve their practice and patient outcomes. Objectives To evaluate the effectiveness of a multifaceted educational program in preventing delirium in hospitalised older patients and improving staff practice, knowledge and confidence. Design A before and after study. Setting A 22-bed general medical ward of a district hospital in Sydney, Australia. Participants Patients were aged 65 years and over and not delirious upon admission. Of 568 eligible patients, 129 were recruited pre-intervention (3 withdrew initial consent) and 129 patients post-intervention. Methods Prior to the intervention, in order to establish a baseline, patients were assessed early after admission and again at discharge. The intervention was a one-hour lecture on delirium focusing on prevention for medical and nursing staff followed by weekly interactive tutorials with delirium resource staff and ward modifications. Following the initial education session, data were gathered in a second group of medical ward patients at the same time-points to ascertain the effectiveness of the intervention. Pre and post-intervention data were analysed to determine change in staff objective knowledge and self-ratings of confidence and clinical practice in relation to delirium. The main outcome measures were incident delirium and change in staff practice, confidence and knowledge. Results The mean age of patients was 81. The pre and post-intervention groups were comparable, aside from greater comorbidity in the pre-intervention group (F(1,253) = 9.20, p = 0.003). Post-intervention there was a significant reduction in incident delirium (19% vs 10.1%, X2 = 4.14, p = 0.042), and improved function on discharge (mean improvement 5.3 points, p < 0.001, SD 13.31, 95% CI -7.61 to -2.97). Staff objective knowledge of delirium improved post-intervention and their confidence assessing and managing delirious patients. Staff addressed more risk factors for delirium post-intervention (8.1 vs 9.8, F(1,253) = 73.44, p < 0.001). Conclusions A low-cost educational intervention reduced the incidence of delirium and improved function in older medical patients and staff knowledge and practice addressing risk factors for delirium. The program is readily transferable to other settings, but requires replication due to limitations of the before and after design.
    International journal of nursing studies 01/2013; 51(7). DOI:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2013.11.005 · 2.25 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

Download
32 Downloads
Available from
Jul 22, 2014