More about quantitative trait locus mapping with diallel designs.

INRA Centre de Toulouse, Unit of Biometry and Artificial Intelligence, Castanet-Tolosan, France.
Genetics Research (Impact Factor: 2.2). 05/2000; 75(2):243-7. DOI: 10.1017/S0016672399004358
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT We present a general regression-based method for mapping quantitative trait loci (QTL) by combining different populations derived from diallel designs. The model expresses, at any map position, the phenotypic value of each individual as a function of the specific-mean of the population to which the individual belongs, the additive and dominance effects of the alleles carried by the parents of that population and the probabilities of QTL genotypes conditional on those of neighbouring markers. Standard linear model procedures (ordinary or iteratively reweighted least-squares) are used for estimation and test of the parameters.

Download full-text


Available from: Ahmed Rebai, Jul 06, 2015
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Regression interval mapping and multiple interval mapping are compared with regard to mapping linked quantitative trait loci (QTL) in inbred-line cross experiments. For that purpose, a simulation study was performed using genetic models with two linked QTL. Data were simulated for F(2) populations of different sizes and with all QTL and marker alleles fixed for alternative alleles in the parental lines. The criteria for comparison are power of QTL identification and the accuracy of the QTL position and effect estimates. Further, the estimates of the relative QTL variance are assessed. There are distinct differences in the QTL position estimates between the two methods. Multiple interval mapping tends to be more powerful as compared to regression interval mapping. Multiple interval mapping further leads to more accurate QTL position and QTL effect estimates. The superiority increased with wider marker intervals and larger population sizes. If QTL are in repulsion, the differences between the two methods are very pronounced. For both methods, the reduction of the marker interval size from 10 to 5 cM increases power and greatly improves QTL parameter estimates. This contrasts with findings in the literature for single QTL scenarios, where a marker density of 10 cM is generally considered as sufficient. The use of standard (asymptotic) statistical theory for the computation of the standard errors of the QTL position and effect estimates proves to give much too optimistic standard errors for regression interval mapping as well as for multiple interval mapping.
    Heredity 07/2005; 94(6):599-605. DOI:10.1038/sj.hdy.6800667 · 3.80 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Many studies already investigated marker-assisted selection (MAS) efficiency but mainly in biparental populations. Connected multiparental populations address a broader diversity and confer a gain of power for QTL detection which must be beneficial for MAS. Our objective was to compare multiparental connected designs to biparental populations taken separately for MAS and phenotypic selection. We first detected QTL for flowering time and grain yield in an experimental maize design involving four parental inbred lines crossed to produce six different biparental populations and confirmed the advantage of multiparental connected designs over biparental populations for QTL detection. Based on these results we performed stochastic simulations to evaluate the expected efficiency of four generations of MAS and phenotypic selection. Different parameters were considered: trait heritability, genetic architecture and whether QTL were assumed to be known or have to be detected. Genetic gains were higher in the multiparental design than on average over the biparental populations considered separately, especially when favourable alleles were equally distributed among parental lines. When QTL detection was included in the simulation process, we found that type I error risk considered for declaring QTL as significant should be adapted to the design. Type I error risks leading to the best response were higher for the biparental populations than for the multiparental design. Besides addressing a broader diversity, multiparental designs increase the power of QTL detection, which reinforces their superiority over biparental designs for MAS. Application of MAS to multiparental designs therefore appears promising to accelerate genetic gain in plant breeding programs.
    Euphytica 05/2007; 161(1):71-84. DOI:10.1007/s10681-007-9607-z · 1.69 Impact Factor
  • Source