Development of an audit instrument for nursing care plan in the patient record

Karolinska Hospital, Department of Nursing, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Quality in Health Care 03/2000; 9(1):6-13. DOI: 10.1136/qhc.9.1.6
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT To develop, validate, and test the reliability of an audit instrument that measures the extent to which patient records describe important aspects of nursing care.
Twenty records from each of three hospital wards were collected and audited. The auditors were registered nurses with a knowledge of nursing documentation in accordance with the VIPS model--a model designed to structure nursing documentation. (VIPS is an acronym formed from the Swedish words for wellbeing, integrity, prevention, and security.)
An audit instrument was developed by determining specific criteria to be met. The audit questions were aimed at revealing the content of the patient for nursing assessment, nursing diagnosis, planned interventions, and outcome. Each of the 60 records was reviewed by the three auditors independently and the reliability of the instrument was tested by calculating the inter-rater reliability coefficient. Content validity was tested by using an expert panel and calculating the content validity ratio. The criterion related validity was estimated by the correlation between the score of the Cat-ch-Ing instrument and the score of an earlier developed and used audit instrument. The results were then tested by using Pearson's correlation coefficient.
The new audit instrument, named Cat-ch-Ing, consists of 17 questions designed to judge the nursing documentation. Both quantity and quality variables are judged on a rating scale from zero to three, with a maximum score of 80. The inter-rater reliability coefficients were 0.98, 0.98, and 0.92, respectively for each group of 20 records, the content validity ratio ranged between 0.20 and 1.0 and the criterion related validity showed a significant correlation of r = 0.68 (p < 0.0001, 95% CI 0.57 to 0.76) between the two audit instruments.
The Cat-ch-Ing instrument has proved to be a valid and reliable audit instrument for nursing records when the VIPS model is used as the basis of the documentation.

Download full-text


Available from: Catrin Björvell, Sep 02, 2015
315 Reads
    • "One option for ensuring management continuity of care is to rely on patient information in the medical record; especially in the written discharge summary forms or letters which are the most common information source at discharge [7]. Such documentation influences the understanding and action at the next level of care [8]. In such one-direction information meta-communication – i.e. communication about the communication such as clarifying questions – is often lacking. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background: Handovers between hospital and primary healthcare possess a risk for patient care. It has been suggested that the exchange of a comprehensive medical record containing both medical and patient-centered aspects of information can support high quality handovers. Objective: The objective of this study was to explore patient handovers between primary and secondary care by assessing the levels of patient-centeredness of medical records used for communication between care settings and by assessing continuity of patient care. Methods: Quantitative content analysis was used to analyze the 76 medical records of 22Swedish patients with chronic diseases and/or polypharmacy. Results: The levels of patient-centeredness documented in handover records were assessed as poor, especially in regards to informing patients and achieving a shared understanding/agreement about their treatment plans. The follow up of patients’ medical and care needs were remotely related to the discharge information sent from the hospital to the primary care providers, or to the hospital provider’s request for patient follow-up in primary healthcare. Link to full-text paper, available until April 28 2015:
    International Journal of Medical Informatics 01/2015; 84(5). DOI:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2015.01.009 · 2.00 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "The nursing process is a structured problem-solving approach to nursing practice and education and was first explained by Yura and Walsh in 1967. It originally comprised of four stages: assessment, planning, implementation and evaluation of care and lately included nursing problem or diagnosis (Bjö rvell et al. 2000). The nursing process model has been widely used as a theoretical basis for nursing practice and documentation. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This paper reports a review that identified and synthesized nursing documentation audit studies, with a focus on exploring audit approaches, identifying audit instruments and describing the quality status of nursing documentation. Quality nursing documentation promotes effective communication between caregivers, which facilitates continuity and individuality of care. The quality of nursing documentation has been measured by using various audit instruments, which reflected variations in the perception of documentation quality among researchers across countries and settings. Searches were made of seven electronic databases. The keywords 'nursing documentation', 'audit', 'evaluation', 'quality', both singly and in combination, were used to identify articles published in English between 2000 and 2010. A mixed-method systematic review of quantitative and qualitative studies concerning nursing documentation audit and reports of audit instrument development was undertaken. Relevant data were extracted and a narrative synthesis was conducted. Seventy-seven publications were included. Audit approaches focused on three natural dimensions of nursing documentation: structure or format, process and content. Numerous audit instruments were identified and their psychometric properties were described. Flaws of nursing documentation were identified and the effects of study interventions on its quality. Research should pay more attention to the accuracy of nursing documentation, factors leading to variation in practice and flaws in documentation quality and the effects of these on nursing practice and patient outcomes, and the evaluation of quality measurement.
    Journal of Advanced Nursing 04/2011; 67(9):1858-75. DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2011.05634.x · 1.74 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "[4,10,13,47–51]. In this study, the evaluation of nursing care plans was carried out using quantitative criteria based on the quantitative part of the Catch-Ing©audit instrument [48], since this part of the instrument measures how the different phases in the nursing process are documented. The instrument was modified for this purpose because the Cat-ch-Ing©audit instrument measures only the presence or absence of the phase of nursing process and does not measure the use of nursing classifications and the relationships between classifications. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Purpose: The purpose of this study was to describe and evaluate whether nurses have documented patient care in compliance with the national nursing documentation model in electronic health records, which means the use of the nursing process and the use of standardized terminology in different phases of the nursing process. Methods: The data were collected from a central hospital in 2003-2006. The data consist of the electronic nursing care plans of 67 neurological patients and 422 surgical patients. The data were analyzed using statistical methods and content analysis. Results: Standardized electronic nursing documentation is based on the nursing process, although the use of the nursing process varies across patients. There is a lack of progress notes relating to needs assessment, the identification of nursing diagnoses and care aims, and the nursing interventions planned in the documentation. The standardized terminology is used in the documentation but inconsistencies emerge in the use of the different classifications. Conclusion: The national model for electronic nursing documentation is suitable for the documentation of patient care in nursing care plans. However, health care professionals need further training in documenting patient care according to the nursing process, and in using the terminology in order to increase patient safety and improve documentation.
    International Journal of Medical Informatics 05/2010; 79(8). DOI:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2010.05.002 · 2.00 Impact Factor
Show more