Article

Anal sphincter tears: prospective study of obstetric risk factors.

Perinatal Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital/Ostra, Göteborg, Sweden.
BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology (Impact Factor: 3.76). 08/2000; 107(7):926-31. DOI: 10.1097/00006254-200101000-00007
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT To evaluate intrapartum risk factors for anal sphincter tear.
A prospective observational study.
Delivery unit at the University Hospital in Göteborg, Sweden.
2883 consecutive women delivered vaginally during the period between 1995 and 1997. Information was obtained, from patient records and from especially designed protocols which were completed during and after childbirth.
Anal sphincter (third and fourth degree) tear.
Anal sphincter tear occurred in 95 of 2883 women (3.3%). Univariate analysis demonstrated that the risk of anal sphincter tear was increased by nulliparity, high infant weight, lack of manual perineal protection, deficient visualisation of perineum, severe perineal oedema, long duration of delivery and especially protracted second phase and bear down, use of oxytocin, episiotomy, vacuum extraction and epidural anaesthesia. After analysis with stepwise logistic regression, reported as odds ratio, 95% confidence interval, the following factors remained independently associated with anal sphincter tear: slight perineal oedema (0.40, 0.26-0.64); manual perineal protection (0.49, 0.28-0.86); short duration of bear down (0.47, 0.24-0.91); no visualisation of perineum (2.77, 1.36-5.63); parity (0.59, 0.40-0.89); and high infant weight (2.02, 1.30-3.16). Analysis of variance showed that manual perineal protection had a stronger influence on lowering the frequency, and lack of visualisation of perineum and infant weight had a stronger influence on raising the frequency, of anal sphincter tears in nulliparous compared with parous women.
Perineal oedema, poor ocular surveillance of perineum, deficient perineal protection during delivery, protracted final phase of the second stage, parity and high infant weight all constitute independent risk factors for anal sphincter tear. Such information is essential in order to reduce perineal trauma during childbirth.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
64 Views
  • Source
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Abstract Objective: Our objectives were to study the association between epidural analgesia and risk of severe perineal tears (SPT), and identify additional risk factors for SPT. Methods: We conducted a historical cohort study of women with term delivery between 2006 and 2011. Inclusion criteria were an uncomplicated singleton pregnancy, cephalic presentation, and vaginal delivery. Multivariate logistic regression models were constructed to study the association between epidural analgesia and SPT, controlling for potential confounders. Additional models studied the association between prolonged second stage and instrumental labor and SPT. Results: During the study period, 61,308 eligible women gave birth, 31,631 (51.6%) of whom received epidural analgesia. SPT occurred in 0.3% of births. Deliveries with epidural had significantly higher rates of primiparity, induction and augmentation of labor, prolonged second stage of labor, instrumental births, and midline episiotomies. The univariate analysis showed a significant association between the use of epidural and SPT (OR: 1.78, 95% CI: 1.34 - 2.36), however this association disappeared when parity was introduced (OR: 0.95, 95% CI: 0.69 - 1.29). Instrumental deliveries and prolonged second stage of labor were both strongly associated with SPT (ORs of 1.82 and 1.77.) Conclusions: Epidural analgesia was not associated with SPT once confounding factors were controlled for.
    The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine: the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians 01/2014; · 1.36 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The occurrence of obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS) has increased in most high-income countries during the past twenty years. The consequences of these injuries can be devastating for women and have an impact on their daily life and quality of health. The aim of this study was to obtain a deeper understanding of midwives' lived experiences of attending a birth in which the woman gets an obstetric anal sphincter injury.
    BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 08/2014; 14(1):258. · 2.52 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

View
72 Downloads
Available from
Jun 6, 2014