Article

Anal sphincter tears: prospective study of obstetric risk factors.

Perinatal Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital/Ostra, Göteborg, Sweden.
BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology (Impact Factor: 3.86). 08/2000; 107(7):926-31. DOI: 10.1097/00006254-200101000-00007
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT To evaluate intrapartum risk factors for anal sphincter tear.
A prospective observational study.
Delivery unit at the University Hospital in Göteborg, Sweden.
2883 consecutive women delivered vaginally during the period between 1995 and 1997. Information was obtained, from patient records and from especially designed protocols which were completed during and after childbirth.
Anal sphincter (third and fourth degree) tear.
Anal sphincter tear occurred in 95 of 2883 women (3.3%). Univariate analysis demonstrated that the risk of anal sphincter tear was increased by nulliparity, high infant weight, lack of manual perineal protection, deficient visualisation of perineum, severe perineal oedema, long duration of delivery and especially protracted second phase and bear down, use of oxytocin, episiotomy, vacuum extraction and epidural anaesthesia. After analysis with stepwise logistic regression, reported as odds ratio, 95% confidence interval, the following factors remained independently associated with anal sphincter tear: slight perineal oedema (0.40, 0.26-0.64); manual perineal protection (0.49, 0.28-0.86); short duration of bear down (0.47, 0.24-0.91); no visualisation of perineum (2.77, 1.36-5.63); parity (0.59, 0.40-0.89); and high infant weight (2.02, 1.30-3.16). Analysis of variance showed that manual perineal protection had a stronger influence on lowering the frequency, and lack of visualisation of perineum and infant weight had a stronger influence on raising the frequency, of anal sphincter tears in nulliparous compared with parous women.
Perineal oedema, poor ocular surveillance of perineum, deficient perineal protection during delivery, protracted final phase of the second stage, parity and high infant weight all constitute independent risk factors for anal sphincter tear. Such information is essential in order to reduce perineal trauma during childbirth.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Lars Ladfors, Jun 18, 2015
0 Followers
 · 
90 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To summarize available data concerning vacuumextraction and it's use in the Czech Republic. Review article. Compilation of published data from scientific literature. The rate of vacuumextraction use in the Czech Republic is one of the lowest in the world. Forceps is usually the preferred technique. The use of vacuumextraction is on the rise, the limiting factor is the fact that in Czech Republic it is not recommended in cases with presumed fetal distress. According to world literature, the preferred technique in cases where operative vaginal delivery is indicated should be vacuumextraction due to significantly lower risk of maternal trauma. An obstetrician should be familiar with both techniques--vacuumextraction and forceps. It up to him/her which instrument is used based on his/her own competency, experience and circumstances of the labour.
    Ceska gynekologie / Ceska lekarska spolecnost J. Ev. Purkyne 10/2010; 75(5):417-22.
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To assess the risk and safety of screening for chromosomal abnormalities during pregnancy through the assessment of exposure to ultrasound and the fetal loss rate after trans-abdominal amniocentesis (AMNIO) or chorionic villus sampling (CVS). It is a retrospective analysis of the fetal loss rate following AMNIO and CVS as a diagnostic tests for chromosomal abnormalities during pregnancy in 1391 singleton pregnancies who attended our clinic from January 2005 to December 2009 (1038 AMNIO and 353 CVS). Pregnancies were followed up to ascertain the fetal loss rate after the procedure which was defined as intrauterine demise or miscarriage before the 24th week of gestation. Review of literature was the method used for assessing the safety of ultrasound during pregnancy. In the group of CVS about 86% of the cases were referred because of a positive screening (screening of chromosomal abnormalities on the bases nuchal translucency and biochemical serum markers (pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A and beta-human chorionic gonadotropin)), test with mean maternal age of 31.7 years and a miscarriage rate of 0.6%. In the group of AMNIO, 40% of the cases were referred because of a positive triple test in the second trimester (screening of chromosomal abnormalities on the bases of biochemical serum markers, alpha-fetoprotein, estriol and total human chorionic gonadotropin in the second trimester of pregnancy). Mean maternal age of 33.2 years and a miscarriage rate of 0.8%. The review of the literature indicates that due to limited amount of information available on some factors (gestational age, duration and number of exposure) during the pregnancy the patient should be exposed to the least ultrasound energy necessary to obtain desired information. The fetal loss rate in our study had confirmed that the risk of both procedures is comparable and is 0.8% for AMNIO and 0.6% for CVS. The lower miscarriage rate after CVS could be explained by the theory that placenta is a spongy organ that will expand easily after the procedure allowing better healing than if the needle had been passed through the amnion which is even more stretched by the amniotic fluid, but we are a wear of that the sample size is too small for such a conclusion. According to the available evidence, exposure to diagnostic ultrasonography during pregnancy appears to be safe.
    Ceska gynekologie / Ceska lekarska spolecnost J. Ev. Purkyne 01/2012; 77(3):236-41.
  • Source