Article

Activation of anterior paralimbic structures during guilt-related script-driven imagery.

Department of Psychology, Tufts University, Medford, Massachusetts 02155, USA.
Biological Psychiatry (Impact Factor: 9.47). 08/2000; 48(1):43-50. DOI: 10.1016/S0006-3223(00)00251-1
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Several recent neuroimaging studies have examined the neuroanatomical correlates of normal emotional states, such as happiness, sadness, fear, anger, anxiety, and disgust; however, no previous study has examined the emotional state of guilt.
In the current study, we used positron emission tomography and the script-driven imagery paradigm to study regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) during the transient emotional experience of guilt in eight healthy male participants. In the Guilt condition, participants recalled and imagined participating in a personal event involving the most guilt they had ever experienced. In the Neutral condition, participants recalled and imagined participating in an emotionally neutral personal event.
In the Guilt versus Neutral comparison, rCBF increases occurred in anterior paralimbic regions of the brain: bilateral anterior temporal poles, anterior cingulate gyrus, and left anterior insular cortex/inferior frontal gyrus.
These results, along with those of previous studies, are consistent with the notion that anterior paralimbic regions of the brain mediate negative emotional states in healthy individuals.

1 Follower
 · 
76 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Social neuroscience studies have shown that the ventral striatum (VS), a highly reward-sensitive brain area, is activated when participants win competitive tasks. However, in these settings winning often entails both avoiding punishment and punishing the opponent. It is thus unclear whether the rewarding properties of winning are mainly associated to punishment avoidance, or if punishing the opponent can be additionally gratifying. In the present paper we explored the neurophysiological correlates of each outcome, aiming to better understand the development of aggression episodes. We previously introduced a competitive reaction time task that separates both effects: in half of the won trials, participants can physically punish their opponent (active trials), whereas in the other half they can only avoid a punishment (passive trials). We performed functional connectivity analysis seeded in the VS to test for differential network interactions in active compared to passive trials. The VS showed greater connectivity with areas involved in reward valuation (orbitofrontal cortex), arousal (dorsal thalamus and posterior insula), attention (inferior occipital gyrus), and motor control (supplementary motor area) in active compared to passive trials, whereas connectivity between the VS and the inferior frontal gyrus decreased. Interindividual variability in connectivity strength between VS and posterior insula was related to aggressive behavior, whereas connectivity between VS and supplementary motor area was related to faster reaction times in active trials. Our results suggest that punishing a provoking opponent when winning might adaptively favor a "competitive state" in the course of an aggressive interaction.
    Brain Imaging and Behavior 03/2015; DOI:10.1007/s11682-015-9370-z · 3.39 Impact Factor
  • Source
    Psychological Inquiry 08/2014; 25(3-4):394-413. DOI:10.1080/1047840X.2014.925339 · 4.73 Impact Factor
  • Psychological Inquiry 08/2014; 25(3-4):376-384. DOI:10.1080/1047840X.2014.916194 · 4.73 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

Download
45 Downloads
Available from
Jun 5, 2014