Hysteroscopic endometrial ablation is an effective alternative to hysterectomy in women with menorrhagia and large uteri.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, St. Joseph's Health Center, 268 Grosvenor Street, London, Ontario, Canada.
The Journal of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists (Impact Factor: 1.61). 08/2000; 7(3):339-45. DOI: 10.1016/S1074-3804(05)60476-8
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT To examine the feasibility, safety, and outcome of hysteroscopic endometrial ablation, and to determine the volume of fluid absorbed during resection versus rollerball coagulation in women with menorrhagia and large uteri.
Retrospective review (Canadian Task Force classification II-2).
University-affiliated teaching hospital.
Forty-two consecutive patients (mean +/- SD age 45.6 +/- 6 yrs) with uterine size greater than 12 weeks (cavity >12 cm). Intervention. Endometrial ablation; 26 (62%) women were pretreated to thin the endometrium.
Resection was performed in 27 patients (65%) and rollerball coagulation in 15 (35%). Ablation was successfully performed in all patients in a day surgery setting. Multiple regression analysis examined the relationship of uterine size, pretreatment, procedure, and duration of surgery to amount of glycine absorbed. Glycine absorption was higher with resection than with coagulation (p = 0.04). Fluid absorption correlated with type of procedure (r = 0.32, p = 0.04) but not with duration of the procedure, uterine size, or pretreatment. One patient with uterine fibroids and one with endometrial adenocarcinoma had hysterectomy. With follow-up of 39 (95%) of 41 women (excluding the one with adenocarcinoma) for 14 +/- 2 months, 38 (93%) were very satisfied. Thirty (73%) had amenorrhea, six (15%) had hypomenorrhea (<3 pads/day), and three (7%) had eumenorrhea (<10 pads/day).
Hysteroscopic endometrial ablation may be a feasible, safe, and effective alternative to hysterectomy in women with menorrhagia and large uteri.

  • The Journal of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists 03/2001; 8(1):18-44, test 45-7. · 1.61 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Both hysterectomy for heavy menstrual bleeding and radical mastectomy for breast cancer are steeped in the history of surgery and have recently been challenged as being too radical for the disorder at hand. Radical mastectomy has largely been replaced with local removal of the tumor with subsequent radiation and/or chemotherapy. Alternatives to hysterectomy include a number of medical interventions, most notably intrauterine progestin-releasing systems, and endometrial ablation, a procedure that has a relatively high success rate and one that is now feasible for many women in an office or procedure room setting. However, although radical mastectomy rates have dropped precipitously, hysterectomy rates, at least in the United States remain relatively stable. Determining the proportion of hysterectomies that are done for heavy menstrual bleeding is difficult, largely because of coding issues, so it is difficult to measure the impact of new medical and minimally invasive surgical procedures. Nevertheless, it seems clear that many women are not exposed to the plethora of options to hysterectomy, a fact that may reflect a number of issues that may include training, skill, and financial incentives or disincentives. Clearly, options to hysterectomy are not a panacea, but if women are empowered to select from all of the options available, the rate of hysterectomy for bleeding should decrease while maintaining, or even enhancing the patient's satisfaction with care.
    Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology 07/2007; 50(2):324-53. · 1.84 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To assess the efficacy of a newly suggested ablative curettage technique in managing premenopausal dysfunctional uterine bleeding. A prospective controlled operative study and clinical trial was carried out at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kasr El-Aini Hospital, Cairo University, Egypt. One hundred cases of premenopausal bleeding were divided into 50 controls and 50 studied cases. Routine diagnostic and follow-up techniques for managing premenopausal bleeding were carried out. Two operative techniques were compared: overcurettage, using Sims sharp curette, and the newly suggested dilatation and ablative curettage, using a Thabet double-bladed sharp curette. Histopathology of curetted material and the endomyometrium after ablation in the failed cases that needed hysterectomy was also included. Successful endometrial ablation and control of the premenopausal bleeding were recorded in 66% of overcurettage cases and in 90% of cases treated with ablative curettage. The latter had significantly fewer operative and postoperative complications. These advantages were also significantly reduced in both techniques compared with other ablative techniques and hysterectomy. Complete ablation could be confirmed histopathologically in the ablated endometrium and in the endomyometrium of the hysterectomy specimens. Ablative curettage is an efficient technique in managing premenopausal dysfunctional uterine bleeding, especially in developing countries where there are limited financial resources.
    Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research 08/2010; 36(4):803-9. · 0.84 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

Available from
May 19, 2014