Laparoscopic placement of the Tenckhoff catheter for peritoneal dialysis.

Department of Surgery, G Hatzikosta General Hospital, Ioannina, Greece.
Surgical laparoscopy, endoscopy & percutaneous techniques (Impact Factor: 0.88). 08/2000; 10(4):218-21. DOI: 10.1097/00129689-200008000-00007
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis catheters can be inserted by open laparotomy as well as by laparoscopy. A prospective randomized study was scheduled to investigate the results of the laparoscopic versus open laparotomy technique for placement of continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis catheters. Fifty patients were enrolled and randomly allocated into two groups of 25 patients each. Group A underwent continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis catheter placement via the open laparotomy technique. In 22 patients, catheters were inserted via midline incision, and in 3 patients with histories of previous catheterization, a paramedian incision was used. Continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis was started 24 to 48 hours later. Group B underwent laparoscopic placement of the catheter with fixation into the pelvis and suture closure of the port wounds. In 21 patients, this catheter placement was the first such placement, and in 4 patients, a previous catheter had been inserted by the open technique and removed for dysfunction. Continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis was started at the end of the procedure. The mean operative time was 22 minutes in group A and 29 minutes in group B (P < 0.001). Fluid leakage was observed in eight patients in group A, but in no patients in group B (P < 0.005). Peritonitis occurred in five patients in group A and in three patients in group B (P > 0.1). Tip migration occurred in five patients in group A and no patients in group B (P < 0.005). In group B, two patients underwent a simultaneous cholecystectomy and one underwent incisional hernia repair. Laparoscopic placement of a Tenckhoff catheter leads to better function than does the open procedure; it allows immediate start of dialysis without fluid leakage and permits simultaneous performance of other laparoscopic procedures.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Permanent peritoneal dialysis (PD) access was first described and introduced in clinical practice more than 40 years ago. It is still undergoing modification and adaptation to various insertion techniques. PD Catheter insertion is commonly performed via one of the three techniques: (a) open surgical, (b) fluoroscopic-guided placement or blind percutaneous placements using a modified Seldinger technique and (c) minimally invasive. Catheter placement is thought to be the key to a successful PD programme and the economic advantages are lost if a patient switches to HD during the 1st year due to failure of PD. The objective of this document was to conduct an evidence-based assessment of a minimally invasive approach to PD catheter insertion, with particular regard to failure rates secondary to catheter dysfunction. Case series and randomised controlled trials suggest that laparoscopic placement of peritoneal dialysis catheters is safe, and useful for insertion of PD catheters in patients who have undergone previous abdominal surgery. An overall success rate of 90% with a less than 5% associated leak rate has been quoted, although a cost benefit analysis has not been performed. However, good grade I evidence is lacking and open surgery may be quicker, though results from on-going trial are awaited with interest.
    Journal of nephrology 01/2014; · 2.02 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Abstract Background: Peritoneal dialysis (PD) is an alternative modality to hemodialysis and is usually used to treat patients with end-stage renal disease. Dual-incision laparoscopic surgery (DILS) had been reported in several surgical fields; however, no report was proposed about DILS in PD catheter implantation (DILS-PD). In this study, we present DILS with a novel, simple, and safe procedure for PD catheter implantation with fixation and describe the long-term outcome. Subjects and Methods: We conducted a prospective data collection and retrospective review of all PD patients from April 2010 until June 2012. During this study period, we performed open surgery for PD catheter implantation (OS-PD) and DILS-PD concurrently. Demographic data, medical, operative, and postoperative findings, and information regarding complications were compared between these two groups. Results: Forty-eight patients had DILS-PD, and 70 patients had OS-PD. There was no difference between the two groups in age, gender, American Society of Anesthesiologists grade, creatinine level, body mass index, and previous abdominal surgery. There was no surgical mortality in either group. The follow-up period ranged from 6 to 24 months, with a mean of 22.4±16.5 months. There was no tube migration in the DILS-PD group, but 25.7% of the patients in the OS-PD group had tube migration (P<.001). A significantly decreased exit-site/tunnel infection rate was found in the DILS-PD group (4.2%) compared with the OS-PD group (17.1%) (P=.032). However, there was no obvious difference in peritonitis occurrence between groups. A significantly decreased catheter failure rate was found in the DILS-PD group (4.2%) compared with the OS-PD group (22.9%) (P=.006). DILS-PD group patients had a favorable survival rate for catheter implantation compared with OS-PD group patients. Conclusions: Our DILS-PD with fixation technique is a simple and safe procedure. This procedure minimized or even eliminated the possibility of migration without additional cost. Our DILS-PD fixatation technique should be recommended for use routinely.
    Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques 07/2013; · 1.07 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background: Laparoscopic placement of peritoneal dialysis catheters is associated with a lower rate of complications. Aim: To report the experience in laparoscopic placement of peritoneal dialysis catheters. Material and Methods: Review of medical records of 81 patients aged 15 to 90 years (42 males) subjected to the procedure between 2010 and 2013. Results: A three port plus omentopexy technique was used. Surgical time was 51 minutes. Other simultaneous surgical procedures were performed in four patients. No patient died, had a bowel perforation or required conversion to open surgery. Ninety eight percent of patients were discharged less than 24 hours after the procedure, using standard analgesics. Four patients required a new surgical procedure due to minor complications. All installed catheters were functional until the moment of his review. Conclusions: Laparoscopic placement of peritoneal dialysis catheters is a safe and effective procedure.
    Revista chilena de cirugía. 12/2013; 65(6):530-533.


Available from
May 16, 2014