SPIKES-A six-step protocol for delivering bad news: application to the patient with cancer.

The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
The Oncologist (Impact Factor: 4.54). 02/2000; 5(4):302-11.
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT We describe a protocol for disclosing unfavorable information-"breaking bad news"-to cancer patients about their illness. Straightforward and practical, the protocol meets the requirements defined by published research on this topic. The protocol (SPIKES) consists of six steps. The goal is to enable the clinician to fulfill the four most important objectives of the interview disclosing bad news: gathering information from the patient, transmitting the medical information, providing support to the patient, and eliciting the patient's collaboration in developing a strategy or treatment plan for the future. Oncologists, oncology trainees, and medical students who have been taught the protocol have reported increased confidence in their ability to disclose unfavorable medical information to patients. Directions for continuing assessment of the protocol are suggested.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: EinleitungZur ärztlichen Aufgabe gehört unter anderem das Überbringen von schlechten Nachrichten an Patienten und ihre Angehörigen. Schlechte Nachrichten werden definiert als „[Nachricht], welche in einem kognitiven, emotionalen oder sich auf das Verhalten auswirkenden Defizit in der Person, welche die Nachricht erhält, resultiert“. Dieses Defizit hält für einige Zeit an, nachdem die Nachricht überbracht wurde ([13], S. 496). Die Bewertung, ob eine Mitteilung in die Kategorie „schlechte Nachrichten“ gehört, ist für den Patienten subjektiv. Der Arzt kann versuchen, sich in den Patienten hineinzuversetzen, aber die abschließende Beurteilung der Nachricht liegt beim Patienten. Es gibt diverse Studien über die Ansichten von Ärzten über das Überbringen schlechter Nachrichten [2,4,9]. Viele Ärzte haben das Überbringen schlechter Nachrichten im Rahmen ihres Studiums oder ihrer Weiterbildung nicht gelernt [7] und empfänden eine Ausbildung in diesem Gebiet als hilfreich [2]. Die Patienten wünsc ...
    Ethik in der Medizin 09/2012; 24(3):241-244. · 0.54 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Abstract: Medical providers are trained to investigate, diagnose, and treat cancer. Their primary goal is to maximize the chances of curing the patient, with less training provided on palliative care concepts and the unique developmental needs inherent in this population. Early, systematic integration of palliative care into standard oncology practice represents a valuable, imperative approach to improving the overall cancer experience for adolescents and young adults (AYAs). The importance of competent, confident, and compassionate providers for AYAs warrants the development of effective educational strategies for teaching AYA palliative care. Just as palliative care should be integrated early in the disease trajectory of AYA patients, palliative care training should be integrated early in professional development of trainees. As the AYA age spectrum represents sequential transitions through developmental stages, trainees experience changes in their learning needs during their progression through sequential phases of training. This article reviews unique epidemiologic, developmental, and psychosocial factors that make the provision of palliative care especially challenging in AYAs. A conceptual framework is provided for AYA palliative care education. Critical instructional strategies including experiential learning, group didactic opportunity, shared learning among care disciplines, bereaved family members as educators, and online learning are reviewed. Educational issues for provider training are addressed from the perspective of the trainer, trainee, and AYA. Goals and objectives for an AYA palliative care cancer rotation are presented. Guidance is also provided on ways to support an AYA’s quality of life as end of life nears.
    Clinical Oncology in Adolescents and Young Adults. 01/2015; 5:1-18.
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Introduction: We investigated whether a communication skill training (CST) for physicians leads to improved satisfaction of patients with the disclosure procedure about lung cancer and whether the patient´s recall can be improved.Methods: In an observation study 101 patients, who were disclosed about their lung cancer diagnosis, were questioned about the recall and satisfaction regarding diagnosis, therapy and therapy goal. The contents of the physicians' structured questionnaire were then matched with the questions posed to patients in interviews regarding recall. A total of 37 physicians from the lung cancer center attended to a structured CST with simulated patients on basis of the SPIKES model. After this intervention, 100 diagnosed patients were interviewed accordingly. Results: Patients recall of diagnosis and therapy was very high in the observational study (correct recall of diagnosis 86%, correct recall of therapy 81%). The recall results of the physicians trained in communication were comparably high (80% and 82%). The recall of the therapeutic goal respectively, were initially low (42%) and could be raised significantly using the CST (61%; p=0.009). The level of satisfaction with the conversation about diagnosisand therapy was high in both studies. Patients` satisfaction with communication about the treatment goal improved significantly when disclosed by trained physicians (81% versus 53%; p<0.001). Conclusion: Lung cancer patients do understand the therapeutic goal and their prognosis better, if the disclosing physician took part in a CST. Moreover, patients are more satisfied with the conversation about their prognosis, when trained physicians explain the disease.
    J Palliat Care Med. 01/2015; 4:182-186.

Full-text (2 Sources)

Available from
May 19, 2014