Integrating Healthy Communities concepts into health professions training.

University of Massachusetts Medical School, Shrewsbury 01545, USA.
Public Health Reports (Impact Factor: 1.64). 115(2-3):266-70.
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT To meet the demands of the evolving health care system, health professionals need skills that will allow them to anticipate and respond to the broader social determinants of health. To ensure that these skills are learned during their professional education and training, health professions institutions must look beyond the medical model of caring for communities. Models in Seattle and Roanoke demonstrate the curricular changes necessary to ensure that students in the health professions are adequately prepared to contribute to building Healthy Communities in the 21st century. In addition to these models, a number of resources are available to help promote the needed institutional changes.


Available from: Amy Hagopian, Jun 12, 2015
  • Source
    American Journal of Public Health 09/2003; DOI:10.2105/AJPH.93.9.1380 · 4.23 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Community-based education (CBE) along with competency approach is increasingly becoming popular. However, there appears to be lack of evidence on CBE competencies for undergraduate curriculum, therefore this systematic review attempted to identify and categorize CBE competencies to determine the ones used frequently. The systematic review aimed at identifying and categorizing CBE competencies implemented in nursing and medical schools to inform all stakeholders of health professional's education. A systematic review of electronic databases including MEDLINE, CINAHL, and ERIC and manual search of four medical education journals was carried out. Search was restricted to original research, published in English language between January 2000 and December 2009. Nineteen studies fulfilled the search criteria. The competencies identified were categorized under six themes: Public Health; Cultural Competence; Leadership and Management; Community Development; Research; and Generic Competencies. Moreover, a number of clinical competencies were also found to be overlapping with CBE. The literature on CBE competencies is limited in number and in its geographical span as most of the studies found was from developed countries; to expand the efforts to other institutions and countries, core competencies for CBE must be recognized and disseminated widely for its integration in health professionals' curriculum.
    Medical Teacher 09/2012; 34(9):733-43. DOI:10.3109/0142159X.2012.700742 · 2.05 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Since the 1970s, The New England College of Optometry (NECO) has been a leader in community-based educational programming. This was accomplished through the development of affiliation agreements with health care facilities that care for the underserved, notably community health centers (CHCs). The college's clinical system, the New England Eye Institute (NEEI), develops CHC programs, manages professional services agreements, initiates teaching affiliation agreements, and leads staff recruitment and retention efforts. CHC collaborations, which effectively address disparities in access to health care and visual health status, represent a significant component of the college's primary care clinical training venues. Since their inception in 1972, these CHC academic-community partnerships have provided more than 650,000 eye examinations to the underserved and have trained more than 3,200 graduates in community-based eye care, interdisciplinary care management environment, clinical prevention strategies, and population health. This report describes NECO's longstanding success with CHCs, explains the scope of practice at CHCs, explains how students are involved in the CHCs' eye care services, and discusses the various management and business arrangements. The benefits and challenges of CHC affiliations with optometry schools and colleges are also discussed.
    Optometry (St. Louis, Mo.) 11/2008; 79(10):594-602. DOI:10.1016/j.optm.2008.06.004 · 1.34 Impact Factor