Article

Variability of valve configuration in the lumen of the coronary sinus in the adult human hearts.

Department of Anatomy and Anthropology, Jedrzej Sniadecki University School of Physical Education, Gdańsk, Poland.
Folia morphologica (Impact Factor: 0.47). 02/2000; 59(3):207-9.
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Described by many authors, valves refer to the coronary sinus. The best known among them are Thebesius and Vieussen valves. Information about valves in the lumen of the coronary sinus, though, is rarely found in anatomic literature. Frequency of occurrence of valves in the lumen of the coronary sinus and the degree of their formation was chartered in this paper. 150 adult human hearts of both sexes from 18 to 85 years of age were tested, fixed in a formalin/ethanol solution. Classical macroscopic anatomical methods were used. The valves in the sinus lumen were observed in 10% of the tested hearts, usually presented as incomplete single ones (7.3%).

0 Bookmarks
 · 
70 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Abstract Objectives: To determine whether a steerable catheter with electrogram guidance could facilitate access to the coronary sinus (CS) during cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) implantation. Design: Consecutive patients who underwent CRT implantation were recruited prospectively to use the steerable catheter technique with real-time electrogram guidance (CS-assist group, n=81) and compared with those using conventional techniques without electrogram guidance (conventional group, n=101). Results: The CS cannulation success rate was clearly greater in the CS-assist group (100%) than in the conventional group (95%, p<0.05), with significantly shorter mean procedure time (52.6±20.6 min vs. 73.2±40.9 min, p<0.01) and fluoroscopy time (3.6±3.2 min vs. 14.2±20.4 min, p<0.01). In the 5 CS cannulation failure cases, mean procedure time (144.0±37.0 min) and fluoroscopic time (57.8±24.8 min) were significantly longer than in the other patients (61.2±32.3 and 8.2±13.6 min respectively, n=177, both p<0.01). Conclusions: Using the steerable catheter with real-time electrogram guidance, location of and access to the CS is more rapid and successful, which may improve the success of CRT implantation and give significant time savings.
    Scandinavian cardiovascular journal: SCJ 01/2014; · 1.07 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Anatomy of the Coronary Venous System. Introduction: Cannulation of the coronary sinus (CS) is a prerequisite for left ventricular (LV) pacing and certain ablation procedures. The detailed regional anatomy for the coronary veins and potential anatomic causes for difficulty with these procedures has not been established. Methods and Results: Therefore, we performed macroscopic measurements in 620 autopsied hearts (mean age 60 ± 23 years, 44% female). The CS was preserved for analysis in 96%. Sixty-three percent had a Thebesian valve that covered the posterior aspect of the CS ostium with extension to the superior (50%) and inferior aspects (18%) and was obstructive with fenestrations in 3 specimens. Partial or near occlusive valves were present occasionally at the ostium of the great cardiac vein (Vieussens; 8%) and middle cardiac vein (5%). Ninety-three percent had left atrial branches, and 41% had at least one branch with lumen > 3 French. For CRT lead placement, the mid-lateral LV was accessible from the middle cardiac vein (20%), the left posterior vein (92%) or the anterior interventricular vein (86%). Among specimens where the left phrenic nerve was preserved it crossed the LV mid-lateral wall in 45%. Conclusions: Epicardial coronary vein anatomy is variable, and the mid-lateral LV wall can potentially be accessed through various tributaries of the epicardial veins. The orientation of the Thebesian valve favors cannulation of the CS from an anterior (ventricular) and inferior approach. Anterobasal, mid-lateral, and inferior apical LV coronary veins lie in proximity to the course of the phrenic nerve. (J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, Vol. pp. 1-6).
    Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology 08/2012; · 3.48 Impact Factor

Full-text

View
1 Download
Available from