The diagnostic validity and therapeutic value of medial branch blocks with or without adjuvants

Pain Management Center, 2831 Lone Oak Road, Paducah, KY 42003, USA.
Current Review of Pain 02/2000; 4(5):337-44.
Source: PubMed


Facet joints have been described as an important source of low back pain. The value of medial branch blocks in the diagnosis of facet joint mediated pain is considered important. However, the therapeutic value of medial branch blocks has not been determined. This study was designed to evaluate the duration of relief obtained and therapeutic value following controlled medial branch blocks with or without adjuvant agents Sarapin (High Chemical Company, Levittown, PA) and Depo-medrol (Pharmacia and Upjohn Company, Kalamazoo, MI). The study population consisted of 180 consecutive patients seen in a single pain management practice, divided into three groups with 60 patients in each group. Group I was treated with local anesthetic only, Group II with the addition of Sarapin, and Group III with the addition of Depo-medrol along with Sarapin. The prevalence of facet joint pain in chronic low back pain was determined as 36%, with a false-positive rate of 25%. Comparison of duration of relief in days with each block in the three groups showed that the relief was significantly superior in Group III compared with Group I and Group II, whereas Group II was superior to Group I.

16 Reads
  • Source
    • "The patients were referred from primary care units from across the city or spontaneously reached us by telephone after being informed of the project by health professionals or acquaintances. In fact, as shown in other studies (6,25,26,42,43), we found no correlation of the results with demographic data, such as age, years of schooling or social security benefit. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: OBJECTIVES: To verify the incidence of facetary and low back pain after a controlled medial branch anesthetic block in a three-month follow-up and to verify the correlation between the positive results and the demographic variables. METHODS: Patients with chronic lumbar pain underwent a sham blockade (with a saline injection) and then a controlled medial branch block. Their symptoms were evaluated before and after the sham injection and after the real controlled medial branch block; the symptoms were reevaluated after one day and one week, as well as after one, two and three months using the visual analog scale. We searched for an association between the positive results and the demographic characteristics of the patients. RESULTS: A total of 104 controlled medial branch blocks were performed and 54 patients (52%) demonstrated >50% improvements in pain after the blockade. After three months, lumbar pain returned in only 18 individuals, with visual analogue scale scores >4. Therefore, these patients were diagnosed with chronic facet low back pain. The three-months of follow-up after the controlled medial branch block excluded 36 patients (67%) with false positive results. The results of the controlled medial branch block were not correlated to sex, age, pain duration or work disability but were correlated with patient age (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: Patient diagnosis with a controlled medial branch block proved to be effective but was not associated with any demographic variables. A three-month follow-up is required to avoid a high number of false positives.
    Clinics (São Paulo, Brazil) 08/2014; 69(8):529-34. DOI:10.6061/clinics/2014(08)05 · 1.19 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "Facet blocks, as with all diagnostic spinal injections, lack accuracy [32]. Reports of false-positive rates range between 20% and 40% [33–35]. These findings, and the observation that in studies where patients were selected by means of comparative blocks the number needed to treat is the lowest, led to the proposal for use of controlled or confirmative blocks [36–38]. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Pain originating from the lumbar facet joints is estimated to represent about 15% of all low back pain complaints. The diagnostic block is considered to be a valuable tool for confirming facetogenic pain. It was demonstrated that a block of the ramus medialis of the ramus dorsalis is preferred over an intra-articular injection. The outcome of the consequent radiofrequency treatment is not different in patients reporting over 80% pain relief after the diagnostic block than in those who have between 50% and 79% pain relief. There is one well-conducted comparative trial assessing the value of one or two controlled diagnostic blocks to none. The results of the seven randomized trials on the use of radiofrequency treatment of facet joint pain demonstrate that good patient selection is imperative for good clinical outcome. Therefore, we suggest one block of the ramus medialis of the ramus dorsalis before radiofrequency treatment.
    Current Pain and Headache Reports 11/2011; 16(1):19-25. DOI:10.1007/s11916-011-0237-8 · 2.26 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "Screening criteria [4] are not suitable for predicting treatment outcomes [15]. Controlled diagnostic blocks are the method of choice for diagnosing facet joint disease [2,4,16,17]. Single blocks are known to be low in reliability for diagnosis because of their high false-positive results. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Facet joint disease plays a major role in axial low-back pain. Few diagnostic tests and imaging methods for identifying this condition exist. Single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) is reported that it has a high sensitivity and specificity in diagnosing facet disease. We prospectively evaluated the use of bone scintigraphy with SPECT for the identification of patients with low back pain who would benefit from medial branch block. SPECT was performed on 33 patients clinically suspected of facet joint disease. After SPECT, an ultrasound guided medial branch block was performed on all patients. On 28 SPECT-positive patients, medial branch block was performed based on the SPECT findings. On 5 negative patients, medial branch block was performed based on clinical findings. For one month, we evaluated the patients using the visual analogue scale (VAS) and Oswestry disability index. SigmaStat and paired t-tests were used to analyze patient data and compare results. Of the 33 patients, the ones who showed more than 50% reduction in VAS score were assigned 'responders'. SPECT positive patients showed a better response to medial branch blocks than negative patients, but no changes in the Oswestry disability index were seen. SPECT is a sensitive tool for the identification of facet joint disease and predicting the response to medial branch block.
    The Korean journal of pain 06/2011; 24(2):81-6. DOI:10.3344/kjp.2011.24.2.81
Show more