Ex vivo activity of XR5000 against solid tumors.

Department of Pathology, Institute of Ophthalmology, University College London, UK.
Anti-Cancer Drugs (Impact Factor: 1.89). 08/2000; 11(6):471-8. DOI: 10.1097/00001813-200007000-00008
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Topoisomerases I and II unravel DNA during transcription, DNA replication and DNA repair. Inhibitors of both enzymes are important anticancer drugs, but only now are combined inhibitors becoming available for clinical use. In this study we have used an ATP-based chemosensitivity assay to determine the activity of XR5000 and possible combinations against ovarian cancer, a tumor sensitive to current topoisomerase inhibitors, and melanoma, an insensitive tumor. A further six tumors of other types were also tested. The results from 20 ovarian cancer and 18 melanoma biopsies show remarkably little difference between the tumor types in terms of IC50, IC90 or two summary indices of chemosensitivity based on all of the concentrations tested. XR5000 on its own shows a steep concentration-response curve in most tumors, only achieving high reduction (above 95%) of ATP levels at 2440 ng/ml (6 microM). The results were often similar to the combination of etoposide and topotecan, particularly at the higher concentrations tested. The combinations with greatest activity in ovarian cancer were with paclitaxel or cisplatin, while melanoma showed greatest improvement with paclitaxel or treosulfan. The results are encouraging for the clinical introduction of this agent, and suggest that it will be effective in combination with currently available drugs for both ovarian cancer and melanoma.

  • Source
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The concept of personalized medicine for cancer is not new. It arguably began with the attempts by Salmon and Hamburger to produce a viable cellular chemosensitivity assay in the 1970s, and continues to this day. While clonogenic assays soon fell out of favour due to their high failure rate, other cellular assays fared better and although they have not entered widespread clinical practice, they have proved to be very useful research tools. For instance, the ATP-based chemosensitivity assay was developed in the early 1990s and is highly standardised. It has proved useful for evaluating new drugs and combinations, and in recent years has been used to understand the molecular basis of drug resistance and sensitivity to anti-cancer drugs. Recent developments allow unparalleled genotyping and phenotyping of tumours, providing a plethora of targets for the development of new cancer treatments. However, validation of such targets and new agents to permit translation to the clinic remains difficult. There has been one major disappointment in that cell lines, though useful, do not often reflect the behaviour of their parent cancers with sufficient fidelity to be useful. Low passage cell lines - either in culture or xenografts are being used to overcome some of these issues, but have several problems of their own. Primary cell culture remains useful, but large tumours are likely to receive neo-adjuvant treatment before removal and that limits the tumour types that can be studied. The development of new treatments remains difficult and prediction of the clinical efficacy of new treatments from pre-clinical data is as hard as ever. One lesson has certainly been that one cannot buck the biology - and that understanding the genome alone is not sufficient to guarantee success. Nowhere has this been more evident than in the development of EGFR inhibitors. Despite overexpression of EGFR by many tumour types, only those with activating EGFR mutations and an inability to circumvent EGFR blockade have proved susceptible to treatment. The challenge is how to use advanced molecular understanding with limited cellular assay information to improve both drug development and the design of companion diagnostics to guide their use. This has the capacity to remove much of the guesswork from the process and should improve success rates.
    Journal of Controlled Release 07/2013; · 7.63 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The tricyclic antidepressants have previously been shown to exert activity against glioma cells in vitro. Initial studies in cell lines suggested that this might extend to melanoma cells. We have therefore conducted a study in primary cell cultures from metastatic cutaneous melanoma deposits using a well established ATP-based tumour chemosensitivity assay to confirm and extend these findings. Two cell lines and eight primary cell cultures from metastatic melanoma deposits were exposed to three tricyclic drugs, amitriptyline, nortriptyline and clomipramine, at concentrations ranging from 200 to 6.25 ┬Ámol/l in the ATP-based tumour chemosensitivity assay. All three drugs showed activity, although nortriptyline was more active than clomipramine or amitriptyline in both cell lines and primary cell cultures, with an IC50 of 9, 27 and 33 ┬Ámol/l, respectively. Tricyclic agents show activity against melanoma in vitro. This could be related to the lysosomal effects based on their cationic amphiphilic properties, or effects at the mitochondrial membrane.
    Anti-cancer drugs 09/2011; 23(1):65-9. · 2.23 Impact Factor