A modelling approach to vaccination and contraception programmes for rabies control in fox populations.

IRBI-UMR CNRS 6035, Université de Tours, France.
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences (Impact Factor: 5.29). 09/2000; 267(1452):1575-82. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2000.1180
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT In a previous study, three of the authors designed a one-dimensional model to simulate the propagation of rabies within a growing fox population; the influence of various parameters on the epidemic model was studied, including oral-vaccination programmes. In this work, a two-dimensional model of a fox population having either an exponential or a logistic growth pattern was considered. Using numerical simulations, the efficiencies of two prophylactic methods (fox contraception and vaccination against rabies) were assessed, used either separately or jointly. It was concluded that far lower rates of administration are necessary to eradicate rabies, and that the undesirable side-effects of each programme disappear, when both are used together.

  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In this paper, we have proposed and analyzed a simple model of Influenza spread with an asymptotic transmission rate. Existence and uniqueness of solutions are established and shown to be uniformly bounded for all non-negative initial values. We have also found a sufficient condition which ensures the persistence of the model system. This implies that both susceptible and infected will always coexist at any location of the inhabited domain. This coexistence is independent of values of the diffusivity constants for two subpopulations. The global stability of the endemic equilibrium is established by constructing a Lyapunov function. By linearizing the system at the positive constant steady-state solution and analyzing the associated characteristic equation, conditions for Hopf and Turing bifurcations are obtained. We have also studied the criteria for diffusion-driven instability caused by local random movements of both susceptible and infective subpopulations. Turing patterns selected by the reaction–diffusion system under zero flux boundary conditions have been explored.
    International Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos 05/2014; 24(5). DOI:10.1142/S0218127414500643 · 1.02 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Emerging diseases of human or veterinary importance are a major challenge to human society. As previously discussed, infectious diseases of wild mammal populations can have significant economic impact, may threaten human and livestock health (Artois et al. 2001), and can affect the welfare and conservation of game (Gortazar et al. 2006) and species of high conservation value (Cleaveland et al. 2002). Wild mammals are also implicated as sources of emerging diseases (Daszak et al. 2000a; Cleaveland 2003; Cunningham 2005). Comprehensive epidemiological investigations and disease surveillance of wild mammal populations will enhance our capaCity to detect and control infectious diseases that may emerge in the future in human and domestic animal populations. Given that the majority of diseases that have emerged in the last couple of decades had a wildlife origin (see Chapter 1), surveillance for wildlife diseases may be seen as an essential tool for the protection of human health. For these reasons, the development of effective programmes for the surveillance of disease in wildlife populations is becoming increasingly important. Epidemiological investigations in wildlife are similar in many respects in terms of their objectives, concepts and methodology to those undertaken for domestic animal health surveillance and monitoring. However, there are also substantial differences, owing to the zoological, behavioural and ecological characteristics of wildlife populations. Consequently, definitions, methods and procedures must often be adapted to suit the unique conditions of wildlife disease surveillance.
    01/2009: pages 187-213; Springer.
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: 1. Control measures for canine rabies include vaccination and reducing population density through culling or sterilization. 2. Despite the evidence that culling fails to control canine rabies, efforts to reduce canine population density continue in many parts of the world. 3. The rationale for reducing population density is that rabies transmission is density-dependent, with disease incidence increasing directly with host density. This may be based, in part, on an incomplete interpretation of historical field data for wildlife, with important implications for disease control in dog populations. Here, we examine historical and more recent field data, in the context of host ecology and epidemic theory, to understand better the role of density in rabies transmission and the reasons why culling fails to control rabies. 4. We conclude that the relationship between host density, disease incidence and other factors is complex and may differ between species. This highlights the difficulties of interpreting field data and the constraints of extrapolations between species, particularly in terms of control policies. 5. We also propose that the complex interactions between dogs and people may render culling of free-roaming dogs ineffective irrespective of the relationship between host density and disease incidence. 6. We conclude that vaccination is the most effective means to control rabies in all species.
    Journal of Animal Ecology 01/2013; 82(1):6-14. DOI:10.2307/23353166 · 4.73 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

Available from
May 21, 2014