Article

Prospective study of fruit and vegetable consumption and incidence of colon and rectal cancers.

Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute (Impact Factor: 15.16). 12/2000; 92(21):1740-52.
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Frequent consumption of fruit and vegetables has been associated with a reduced risk of colorectal cancer in many observational studies.
We prospectively investigated the association between fruit and vegetable consumption and the incidence of colon and rectal cancers in two large cohorts: the Nurses' Health Study (88 764 women) and the Health Professionals' Follow-up Study (47 325 men). Diet was assessed and cumulatively updated in 1980, 1984, 1986, and 1990 among women and in 1986 and 1990 among men. The incidence of cancer of the colon and rectum was ascertained up to June or January of 1996, respectively. Relative risk (RR) estimates were calculated with the use of pooled logistic regression models accounting for various potential confounders. All statistical tests were two-sided.
With a follow-up including 1 743 645 person-years and 937 cases of colon cancer, we found little association of colon cancer incidence with fruit and vegetable consumption. For women and men combined, a difference in fruit and vegetable consumption of one additional serving per day was associated with a covariate-adjusted RR of 1.02 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.98-1.05). A difference in vegetable consumption of one additional serving per day was associated with an RR of 1.03 (95% CI = 0.97-1.09). Similar results were obtained for women and men considered separately. A difference in fruit consumption of one additional serving per day was associated with a covariate-adjusted RR for colon cancer of 0.96 (95% CI = 0.89-1.03) among women and 1. 08 (95% CI = 1.00-1.16) among men. For rectal cancer (total, 244 cases), a difference in fruit and vegetable consumption of one additional serving per day was associated with an RR of 1.02 (95% CI = 0.95-1.09) in men and women combined. None of these associations was modified by vitamin supplement use or smoking habits.
Although fruits and vegetables may confer protection against some chronic diseases, their frequent consumption does not appear to confer protection from colon or rectal cancer.

Full-text

Available from: Graham A Colditz, Jun 02, 2015
1 Follower
 · 
79 Views
  • The American Journal of Cardiology 12/2006; 98(11):1550-1555. DOI:10.1016/j.amjcard.2006.10.005 · 3.43 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Previous epidemiological studies on the relation between dietary legume consumption and risk of colorectal cancer (CRC) remain controversial. We conducted a meta-analysis based on prospective cohort studies to investigate the association between dietary legume consumption and risk of CRC. Fourteen cohort studies were finally included, containing a total of 1903459 participants and 12261 cases who contributed 11628960 person-years. We found that higher legume consumption was associated with a decreased risk of CRC (RR, relative risk = 0.91; 95% CI, confidence interval = 0.84-0.98). Subgroup analyses suggested that higher legume consumption was inversely associated with CRC risk in Asian (RR = 0.82; 95% CI = 0.74-0.91) and soybean intake was associated with a decreased risk of CRC (RR = 0.85; 95% CI = 0.73-0.99). Findings from our meta-analysis supported an association between higher intake of legume and a reduced risk of CRC. Further studies controlled for appropriate confounders are warranted to validate the associations.
    Scientific Reports 03/2015; 5:8797. DOI:10.1038/srep08797 · 5.08 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background: The CpG Island Methylator Phenotype (CIMP) represents a subset of colorectal cancers (CRCs) characterized by widespread aberrant DNA hypermethylation at select CpG islands. The risk factors and environmental exposures contributing to etiologic heterogeneity between CIMP and non-CIMP tumors are not known. Methods: We measured the CIMP status of 3,119 primary population-based CRC tumors from the multinational Colon Cancer Family Registry. Etiologic heterogeneity was assessed by a case-case study comparing risk factor frequency of CRC cases with CIMP and non-CIMP tumors using logistic regression to estimate the case-case odds ratio (ccOR). Results: We found associations between tumor CIMP status and MSI-H (ccOR=7.6), BRAF V600E mutation (ccOR=59.8), proximal tumor site (ccOR=9) (all p<0.0001), female sex (ccOR=1.8; 95% CI=1.5-2.1), older age (ccOR=4.0 comparing over 70 years vs under 50; 95% CI=3.0-5.5) and family history of CRC (ccOR=0.6, 95% CI=0.5-0.7). While use of NSAIDs varied by tumor CIMP status for both males and females (p=0.0001 and p=0.02, respectively), use of multi-vitamin or calcium supplements did not. Only for female CRCs was CIMP status associated with increased pack-years of smoking (trend p < 0.001) and body mass index (BMI) (trend p = 0.03). Conclusions: The frequency of several CRC risk factors varied by CIMP status, and the associations of smoking and obesity with tumor subtype were evident only for females. Impact: Differences in the associations of a unique DNA methylation-based subgroup of CRC with important lifestyle and environmental exposures increase understanding of the molecular pathologic epidemiology of this heavily methylated subset of CRCs. Copyright © 2015, American Association for Cancer Research.
    Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention 01/2015; 24(3). DOI:10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-14-1161 · 4.32 Impact Factor