Depression and diabetes - Impact of depression symptoms on adherence, function, costs

Box 356560, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.
Archives of Internal Medicine (Impact Factor: 13.25). 12/2000; 160(21):3278-85. DOI: 10.1001/archinte.160.21.3278
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Depression is common among patients with chronic medical illness. We explored the impact of depressive symptoms in primary care patients with diabetes on diabetes self-care, adherence to medication regimens, functioning, and health care costs.
We administered a questionnaire to 367 patients with types 1 and 2 diabetes from 2 health maintenance organization primary care clinics to obtain data on demographics, depressive symptoms, diabetes knowledge, functioning, and diabetes self-care. On the basis of automated data, we measured medical comorbidity, health care costs, glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA(1c)) levels, and oral hypoglycemic prescription refills. Using depressive symptom severity tertiles (low, medium, or high), we performed regression analyses to determine the impact of depressive symptoms on adherence to diabetes self-care and oral hypoglycemic regimens, HbA(1c) levels, functional impairment, and health care costs.
Compared with patients in the low-severity depression symptom tertile, those in the medium- and high-severity tertiles were significantly less adherent to dietary recommendations. Patients in the high-severity tertile were significantly distinct from those in the low-severity tertile by having a higher percentage of days in nonadherence to oral hypoglycemic regimens (15% vs 7%); poorer physical and mental functioning; greater probability of having any emergency department, primary care, specialty care, medical inpatient, and mental health costs; and among users of health care within categories, higher primary (51% higher), ambulatory (75% higher), and total health care costs (86% higher).
Depressive symptom severity is associated with poorer diet and medication regimen adherence, functional impairment, and higher health care costs in primary care diabetic patients. Further studies testing the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of enhanced models of care of diabetic patients with depression are needed. Arch Intern Med. 2000;160:3278-3285.

  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Food insecurity- lack of dependable access to adequate food-may play a role in poor diabetes control. We aimed to determine the relationship between food security status and depression, diabetes distress, medication adherence and glycemic control. Secondary analysis of baseline data from Peer Support for Achieving Independence in Diabetes, a randomized controlled trial that enrolled patients from November 2011 to October 2013. Participants had poorly controlled type 2 diabetes (A1c ≥ 8.0 % on eligibility screen), household income < 250 % of the federal poverty level, were 30-70 years old, and were recruited from a large public hospital, a VA medical center and a community-health center in King County, Washington. We measured food insecurity determined by the Department of Agriculture's 6-Item Food Security Module. Depression, diabetes distress and medication adherence measured by PHQ-8, Diabetes Distress Scale and Morisky Medication Adherence Scale, respectively. Diet was assessed through Summary of Diabetes Self-Care Activities and Starting the Conversation tool. Incidence of hypoglycemic episodes was by patient report. Glycemic control was assessed with glycosylated hemoglobin (A1c) values from fingerstick blood sample. The prevalence of food insecurity was 47.4 %. Chi-square tests revealed participants with food insecurity were more likely to be depressed (40.7 % vs. 15.4 %, p < 0.001), report diabetes distress (55.2 % vs. 33.8 %, p < 0.001) and have low medication adherence (52.9 % vs. 37.2 %, p = 0.02). Based on linear regression modeling, those with food insecurity had significantly higher mean A1c levels (β = 0.51; p = 0.02) after adjusting for sex, age, race/ethnicity, language, education, marital status, BMI, insulin use, depression, diabetes distress and low medication adherence. Almost half of participants had food insecurity. Food insecurity was associated with depression, diabetes distress, low medication adherence and worse glycemic control. Even with adjustment, people with food insecurity had higher mean A1c levels than their food-secure counterparts, suggesting there may be other mediating factors, such as diet, that explain the relationship between food security status and diabetes control.
    Journal of General Internal Medicine 04/2015; DOI:10.1007/s11606-015-3351-1 · 3.42 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This cross-sectional study aimed to assess the levels of diabetes knowledge among adult Arab diabetic patients living in Qatar and to determine how the knowledge influences on attitude and practices toward their illness. A validated, reliable, and modified questionnaire (Baradaran et al., BMC Public 6:134, 2006) was distributed to participants in a face-to-face interview. Of the 130 eligible participants, 105 subjects responded; among them, 63 were females and 42 males while age range was 20-65 years. The knowledge score was 14.6+/−8.4 out of a maximum of 48 mean total and the attitude score was 0.5+/−3.4 out of 24 mean total, while the practice score was 15.1+/−9 out of 48 mean total. This study demonstrates that the levels of knowledge, attitude, and practice among adult Arab type 2 diabetic patients are rather poor. As a result of this study, a nationwide group-based structured diabetes educational program has been developed. Arabian Gulf countries have witnessed the emergence of the obesity epidemic and diabetes mellitus as a major public health problem in the region (Musaiger, Fam Pract 7:9-13, 1990). The state of Qatar, over the last three decades of economic transition, has witnessed a rapid rise in cardiovascular morbidity and mortality mainly due to diabetes. According to the International Diabetes Federation, Qatar has a national diabetes prevalence of 16 % (Diabetes Atlas, International Diabetes Federation, 2003), making the disease an epidemic and a national health and economic burden. Arabian Gulf countries including Qatar have abandoned their traditional complex carbohydrate- and fiber-rich diets and replaced it with energy-dense, high-fat, empty calories westernized diet lacking essential nutrients and fiber (Al Mahroos, Ann Saudi Med 20:111-112, 2000; Lawati et al., Diabet Med 19:954-7, 2002).
    International Journal of Diabetes in Developing Countries 01/2015; DOI:10.1007/s13410-014-0263-2 · 0.37 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Achieving glycaemic control in diabetes reduces complications and improves outcomes. Glycaemic control requires both good quality clinical care and effective self-management support. However, the relationship between these factors in routine clinical practice is unclear. To evaluate baseline levels of self-management and clinical quality of care in patients with type 2 diabetes in primary care in Mexico and to explore relationships between measures of self-management and clinical quality of care. The sample consisted of adults (N=205) diagnosed with type 2 diabetes for over a year and registered at one of five practices in the Mexican Institute of Social Security in Aguascalientes. Self-management and quality of care were measured using medical record review and interviews, including validated measures of diabetes knowledge, self-care behaviours, self-efficacy, treatment intensification, continuity of care, doctor-patient communication, and patient satisfaction with diabetes care. HbA1c and cholesterol tests were taken. There were few associations between measures of self-management, and between measures of the quality of clinical care. 'Strong' knowledge about medical prescription was associated with higher diabetes knowledge (OR = 1.2, 95% CI 1.08 to 1.32). Diabetes self-efficacy was associated with self-care behaviours (OR = 1.51, 95% CI 1.26 to 1.81). Patient-doctor communication was associated with continuity of care (Chi-squared = 11.03, P <0.05), with patient satisfaction (β = 6.17, 95% CI 4.47 to 7.93) and with diabetes self-efficacy (β = 0.70, 95% CI 0.19 to 1.20, P <0.01). Patient satisfaction was associated with continuity of care (F = 7.82, P <0.001). The associations between measures of self-management and quality of care were modest. Patients who were achieving high levels of one aspect of care were not necessarily receiving high levels of the other. This indicates that different factors are likely to be driving each aspect of care and highlights the importance of measuring their relative importance.
    Quality in primary care 12/2014; 22(6):262-269.