Outcomes After Initial Receipt of Social Security Benefits Among Homeless Veterans With Mental Illness

University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut, United States
Psychiatric Services (Impact Factor: 2.41). 01/2001; 51(12):1549-54. DOI: 10.1176/appi.ps.51.12.1549
Source: PubMed


This study examined the relationship between receiving disability payments and changes in health status, community adjustment, and subjective quality of life.
The study evaluated outcomes among homeless mentally ill veterans who applied for Social Security Disability Insurance or Supplemental Security Income through a special outreach program. Veterans who were awarded benefits were compared with those who were denied benefits; their sociodemographic characteristics, clinical status, and social adjustment were evaluated just before receiving the initial award decision and again three months later.
Beneficiaries (N=50) did not differ from those were denied benefits (N=123) on any baseline sociodemographic or clinical characteristics. However, beneficiaries were more willing to delay gratification, as reflected in scores on a time preference measure. Three months after the initial decision, beneficiaries had significantly higher total incomes and reported a higher quality of life. They spent more on housing, food, clothing, transportation, and tobacco products but not on alcohol or illegal drugs. No differences were found between groups on standardized measures of psychiatric status or substance abuse.
Receipt of disability payments is associated with improved subjective quality of life and is not associated with increased alcohol or drug use.

Download full-text


Available from: David J Dausey, Mar 12, 2014
  • Source
    • "The link between the transfer program payments and substance abuse – a phenomenon sometimes referred to as the 'full wallets' hypothesis – has been documented by Verhuel et al. (1997), Rosenheck et al. (2000), Maynard and Cox (2000), Halpern and Mechem (2001), Swartz et al. (2003), Riddell and Riddell (2006), and Li et al. (2007). In the most detailed study to date, Dobkin and Puller (2007) use administrative records from California to show a within-month "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: We document a within-month mortality cycle where deaths decline before the 1st day of the month and then spike after the 1st. This cycle is present across a wide variety of causes and demographic groups. A similar cycle exists for a range of activities, suggesting the mortality cycle may be due to short-term variation in levels of activity. We provide evidence that the within-month activity cycle is generated by liquidity. Our results suggest a causal pathway whereby liquidity problems reduce activity, which in turn reduces mortality. These relationships help explain the pro-cyclic nature of mortality.
  • Source
    • "The largest and most direct literature is that surrounding what is called the 'full wallets' hypothesis, which suggests that the receipt of income encourages drug and alcohol abuse in some populations. Papers by Verhuel et al. (1997), Rosenheck et al. 2000, Maynard and Cox (2000), Halpern and Mechem (2001), Riddell and Riddell (2006), and Li et al. (2007) have found such a relationship. In the most detailed study to date, Dobkin and Puller (2007) use administrative records from California to show that hospital admissions and within-hospital mortality increases among Supplemental Security Income and Social Security Disability Income recipients immediately after they are paid. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Many studies find that households increase their consumption after the receipt of expected income payments, a result inconsistent with the life-cycle/permanent income hypothesis. Consumption can increase adverse health events, such as traffic accidents, heart attacks and strokes. In this paper, we examine the short-term mortality consequences of income receipt. We find that mortality increases following the arrival of monthly Social Security payments, regular wage payments for military personnel, the 2001 tax rebates, and Alaska Permanent Fund dividend payments. The increase in short-run mortality is large, potentially eliminating some of the protective benefits of additional income.
    Journal of Public Economics 01/2009; 95(15311). DOI:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2011.05.010 · 1.46 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "Other studies have specifically focused on the increased prevalence of substance abuse and related harm around the beginning of the month, the so-called ''check effect'' (Grossman et al. 1997; Phillips, Christenfeld, and Ryan 1999; Catalano et al. 2000; Halpern and Mechem 2001). However, no differences in drug use were observed in a comparison of homeless persons who received public support payments over a 3-month period and those who did not (Rosenheck, Lam, and Randolph 1997) and no increased substance use was found among homeless veterans awarded supplemental security income (SSI) or Social Security Disability Insurance (SSDI) compared with veterans whose applications were denied (Rosenheck et al. 2000). A cross-sectional analysis of 2,474 veterans enrolled in an outreach program also found no greater substance use among those receiving disability payments than among those not receiving them (Frisman and Rosenheck 1997). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To determine whether receipt of social supplemental security income (SSI) or Social Security disability income (SSDI) disability payments is associated with increased drug and alcohol use. Secondary analysis of data from 6,199 participants in the Access to Community Care and Effective Social Supports and Services demonstration for the homeless mentally ill. Observational, 12-month, cohort study completed over 4 years. Substance abuse and other outcomes were compared between the participants who did not receive SSI or SSDI during the 12-month study, those newly awarded benefits, and those without benefits throughout the 12 months. Social Security administrative records were used to corroborate Social Security benefit status. Drug and alcohol use were measured by self-report and clinician ratings. Participants who did not receive benefits significantly reduced their substance use over time. In generalized estimating equations models that adjusted for potentially confounding covariates, participants who newly received Social Security benefits showed no greater drug use than those without benefits but had significantly more days housed and fewer days employed. Participants whose benefits antedated the demonstration and continued during the 12 months had more clinician-rated drug use over time than those without benefits. In this vulnerable population, participants with newly awarded benefits did not have any different drug use changes than those without benefits, and had relatively more days housed. The hypothesis that Social Security benefits facilitate drug use was not supported by longitudinal data in this high-risk population.
    Health Services Research 03/2006; 41(1):173-91. DOI:10.1111/j.1475-6773.2005.00481.x · 2.78 Impact Factor
Show more